Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Improved genetic manipulation of human embryonic stem cells

Abstract

Low efficiency of transfection limits the ability to genetically manipulate human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), and differences in cell derivation and culture methods require optimization of transfection protocols. We transiently transferred multiple independent hESC lines with different growth requirements to standardized feeder-free culture, and optimized conditions for clonal growth and efficient gene transfer without loss of pluripotency. Stably transfected lines retained differentiation potential, and most lines displayed normal karyotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Procedure and characterization of cells adapted to trypsin-based Matrigel culture.
Figure 2: Low-density Matrigel culture results in greatly enhanced transfection efficiencies of hESCs.
Figure 3: Functional validation of transfection methods.

Similar content being viewed by others

Zixuan Zhao, Xinyi Chen, … Hanry Yu

References

  1. He, J., Yang, Q. & Chang, L.J. J. Virol. 79, 13497–13508 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith-Arica, J.R. et al. Cloning Stem Cells 5, 51–62 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liew, C.-G., Draper, J.S., Walsh, J., Moore, H. & Andrews, P.W. Stem Cells 25, 1521–1528 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thyagarajan, B. et al. Stem Cells 26, 119–126 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lombardo, A. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1298–1306 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vieyra, D.S. & Goodell, M.A. Stem Cells 25, 2559–2566 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilber, A. et al. Stem Cells 25, 2919–2927 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vallier, L., Alexander, M. & Pedersen, R. Stem Cells 25, 1490–1497 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Denning, C. et al. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 50, 27–37 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zwaka, T.P. & Thomson, J.A. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 319–321 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Costa, M. et al. Nat. Protoc. 2, 792–796 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eiges, R. et al. Curr. Biol. 11, 514–518 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Draper, J.S. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 53–54 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker, D.E.C. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 207–215 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Passier, R. et al. Stem Cells 23, 772–780 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to J. Braam for assistance creating Figure 1a, D. Ward-van Oostwaard and J. Monshouwer-Kloots for expert technical assistance. We thank J. Thomson and T. Zwaka (University of Wisconsin Medical School and the National Primate Research Center, Madison) for providing the POU5F1 targeting vector and C. Cowan and D. Melton (Harvard Stem Cell Institute) for the gift of HUES-1,5,7 and -15. This work was supported by the Dutch Program for Tissue Engineering and European Commission Sixth Framework Programme contract ('Heart Repair') LSHM-CT-2005-018630. C. Denning is supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.R.B., C.D., R.P. and C.L.M. designed and planned the study. S.R.B. performed the majority of the laboratory experiments. S.v.d.B. maintained hESC lines on feeders and C.D. contributed to experiments with NOTT1, 2 and HUES7. P.K. and R.H. performed karyotype analyses. S.B., R.P. and C.M. prepared the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine L Mummery.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–5, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Methods. (PDF 6984 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braam, S., Denning, C., van den Brink, S. et al. Improved genetic manipulation of human embryonic stem cells. Nat Methods 5, 389–392 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1200

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1200

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing