Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Methagora
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
naturejobs
For Advertisers
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
Application notes
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Protocols
Nature Genetics
Nature Chemical Biology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Neuroscience
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Article
Nature Methods - 5, 425 - 429 (2008)
Published online: 30 March 2008; | doi:10.1038/nmeth.1197

A metric for odorant comparison

Rafi Haddad1, 2, Rehan Khan1, Yuji K Takahashi3, Kensaku Mori3, David Harel2 & Noam Sobel1

1  Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Hertzel, Rehovot 76100 Israel.

2  Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Hertzel, Rehovot 76100 Israel.

3  Department of Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

Correspondence should be addressed to Rafi Haddad rhaddad@weizmann.ac.il

In studies of vision and audition, stimuli can be systematically varied by wavelength and frequency, respectively, but there is no equivalent metric for olfaction. Restricted odorant-feature metrics such as number of carbons and functional group do not account for response patterns to odorants varying along other structural dimensions. We generated a multidimensional odor metric, in which each odorant molecule was represented as a vector of 1,664 molecular descriptor values. Revisiting many studies, we found that this metric and a second optimized metric were always better at accounting for neural responses than the specific metric used in each study. These metrics were applicable across studies that differed in the animals studied, the type of olfactory neurons tested, the odorants applied and the recording methods used. We use this new metric to recommend sets of odorants that span the physicochemical space for use in olfaction experiments.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Making scents out of how olfactory neurons are ordered in space

Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Feb 2009)

AMPA autoreceptors fill the gap in olfactory temporal coding

Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Nov 2002)

See all 15 matches for News And Views
 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
CrossRef lists 3 articles citing this articleCrossRef lists 3 articles citing this article
Save this linkSave this link
Supplementary info
Export citation

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Nature Methods
ISSN: 1548-7091
EISSN: 1548-7105
Journal home | Current issue | Archive | Press releases |
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2008 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy