Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Methagora
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
naturejobs
For Advertisers
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
Application notes
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Protocols
Nature Genetics
Nature Chemical Biology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Neuroscience
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Methods to Watch
Method of the Year
Contents Editorial News Feature Primer
Commentary Methods to Watch Feedback  


Nature Methods - 5, 22 (2008)
doi:10.1038/nmeth1159

Experimental micro-matchmaking

Nicole Rusk

Needed: large scale experimental validation of predicted microRNA targets.
The importance of microRNAs—short noncoding RNAs that inhibit mRNA expression—is as big as their size is small. They are thought to regulate at least 30% of all human genes and have a crucial role in normal and disease development. The relatively easy part in studying microRNAs is to find new ones and to establish their profiles in a cell or tissue using techniques such as microarrays, reverse-transcriptase PCR and sequencing. The challenging part is to match a microRNA to its mRNA target, as the interaction is not only based on the complementarity of the sequence but on many other factors.

MicroRNA finds its targets.

Given the much larger number of mRNAs compared to microRNAs, the most efficient way to find a match is by computational means. Several researchers have developed algorithms relying not only on sequence but on other factors such as evolutionary conservation, sequences surrounding the binding site and, most recently, mRNA structure and accessibility as well as expression levels of both mRNA and micro RNA. The real crux of the matter, though, is the experimental validation of these predicted targets. Currently the wet-lab validation of an in silico target is still cumbersome. What is needed is a large-scale assay that allows rapid and definitive identification of an mRNA targeted by a microRNA. Various efforts toward that goal are under way, some making use of the microRNA-mRNA pair in vivo by using the microRNA as a primer and extending the sequence further (J. Mol. Biol. 358, 983–986; 2006), others trying to isolate and characterize the microRNA-mRNA-ribonucleoprotein complex (RNA 13, 1198–1204; 2007). Although these assays allow validation of specific targets, they are not at a scale yet that will allow rapid and comprehensive validation of all microRNA targets—and to go from large scale in silico predictions to large-scale in vitro validation will be a welcome breakthrough in the field of microRNA biology.

 Top
FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
Save this linkSave this link
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Nature Methods
ISSN: 1548-7091
EISSN: 1548-7105
Journal home | Current issue | Archive | Press releases |
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2008 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy