Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

The invertor knock-in conditional chromosomal translocation mimic

Abstract

Knock-in models of tumor-specific chromosomal translocations can generate lethal mutations. To circumvent this, a new conditional gene fusion model has been developed (invertor mice) and exemplified with the Ews-ERG fusion oncogene. An ERG segment, flanked by loxP sites, was knocked in to an intron of the Ews gene but in an inverted transcription orientation and lineage-specific Ews-ERG fusion created by Cre-mediated inversion. This invertor method is a completely conditional approach, applicable to any gene fusion, to emulate effects of translocations found in human cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Strategy for generating Ews-ERG invertor gene by homologous recombination.
Figure 2: Leukemia characteristics of Ews-ERG invertor mice.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rabbitts, T.H. Nature 372, 143–149 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Look, A.T. Science 278, 1059–1065 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennicelli, J.L. & Barr, F.G. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 14, 412–419 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crozat, A., Aman, P., Mandahl, N. & Ron, D. Nature 363, 640–644 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rabbitts, T.H., Forster, A., Larson, R. & Nathan, P. Nat. Genet. 4, 175–180 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Corral, J. et al. Cell 85, 853–861 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Higuchi, M. et al. Cancer Cell 1, 63–74 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, A.J.H. et al. Nat. Genet. 9, 376–384 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Deursen, J., Fornerod, M., van Rees, B. & Grosveld, G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 7376–7380 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Buchholz, F., Refaeli, Y., Trumpp, A. & Bishop, J.M. EMBO Rep. 1, 133–139 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins, E.C., Pannell, R., Simpson, E.M., Forster, A. & Rabbitts, T.H. EMBO Rep. 1, 127–132 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Forster, A. et al. Cancer Cell 3, 449–458 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dale, E.C. & Ow, D.W. Gene 91, 79–85 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts, C.W., Leroux, M.M., Fleming, M.D. & Orkin, S.H. Cancer Cell 2, 415–425 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McCormack, M.P., Forster, A., Drynan, L.F., Pannell, R. & Rabbitts, T.H. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 9003–9013 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council. R.C. was the recipient of a Leukemia Research Fund Gordon Pillar Studentship, M.M. is the recipient of a fellowship from the German Research Foundation, and M.N.L. was the recipient of a Kay Kendall fellowship. We are very grateful to A. McKenzie for the frt-flanked PGK-neo clone. We would also like to thank G. King, A. Middleton and C. Pearce for animal husbandry and A. Lenton for the illustration work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence H Rabbitts.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Targeting cassettes for invertor or knock-in cDNA cloning. (PDF 184 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Strategy for construction of the invertor cDNA cassette. (PDF 212 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Cassettes for knock-in of the Cre recombinase gene into targeting vectors for gene specific expression. (PDF 190 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

ERG cDNA sequence for invertor knock-in targeting clones (PDF 68 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 89 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forster, A., Pannell, R., Drynan, L. et al. The invertor knock-in conditional chromosomal translocation mimic. Nat Methods 2, 27–30 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth727

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth727

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing