Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

3D spectral imaging with synchrotron Fourier transform infrared spectro-microtomography

Abstract

We report Fourier transform infrared spectro-microtomography, a nondestructive three-dimensional imaging approach that reveals the distribution of distinctive chemical compositions throughout an intact biological or materials sample. The method combines mid-infrared absorption contrast with computed tomographic data acquisition and reconstruction to enhance chemical and morphological localization by determining a complete infrared spectrum for every voxel (millions of spectra determined per sample).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: FTIR spectro-microtomographic imaging of Zinnia.
Figure 2: Lignocellulose, hemicellulose and CH functional group distributions in a Populus wood fiber.
Figure 3: 2D and 3D chemical images of hair.
Figure 4: Top and side views of 3D protein and lipid distributions for an embryoid body colony of stem cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holman, H.-Y.N., Bechtel, H.A., Hao, Z. & Martin, M.C. Anal. Chem. 82, 8757–8765 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, L.M. & Dumas, P. Biomembranes 1758, 846–857 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kastyak-Ibrahim, M.Z. et al. Neuroimage 60, 376–383 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hazen, T.C. et al. Science 330, 204–208 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nasse, M.J. et al. Nat. Methods 8, 413–416 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pampaloni, F., Reynaud, E.G. & Stelzer, E.H.K. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 839–845 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guilhaumou, N., Dumas, P., Carr, G.L. & Williams, G.P. Appl. Spectrosc. 52, 1029–1034 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jamme, F., Lagarde, B., Giuliani, A., Garcia, G. & Mercury, L. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 425, 142002 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McNaughton, D., Wood, B.R., Cox, T.C., Drenckhahn, J.-D. & Bambery, K.R. in Infrared and Raman Spectroscopic Imaging (eds. Salzer, R. & Siesler, H.W.) 203–223 (Wiley, 2009).

  10. Stone, N. et al. Chem. Sci. 2, 776–780 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Holman, H.-Y.N., Martin, M.C. & McKinney, W.R. J. Biol. Phys. 29, 275–286 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Herman, G.T Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography: Image Reconstruction from Projection 2nd edn. (Springer, 2010).

  13. Mizutani, R. et al. in Microscopy: Science, Technology, Applications and Education. Vol. 1 (eds. Mendez-Vilas, A. & Diaz, J.) 379–386 (Formatex Research Centre, 2010).

  14. de Jonge, M.D. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 15676–15680 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Illman, B.L. & Dowd, B.A. in Developments in X-Ray Tomography II Vol. 3772 (ed. Bonse, U.), 198–204 (SPIE, 1999).

  16. Lacayo, C.I. et al. Plant Physiol. 154, 121–133 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fukuda, H. & Komamine, A. Plant Physiol. 65, 57–60 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Buschke, D.G., Eliceiri, K.W. & Ogle, B.M. in Stem Cell-Based Tissue Repair (ed. Goradetsky, R.S.) 55–140 (RSC, 2010).

  19. Pijanka, J.K. et al. Analyst (Lond.) 135, 3126–3132 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cao, J. et al. J. Biophotonics published online, 10.1002/jbio.201200217 (25 April 2013).

  21. Ye, D. et al. Analyst (Lond.) 137, 4774–4784 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dottori, M., Leung, J., Turnley, A.M. & Pebay, A. Stem Cells 26, 1146–1154 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sánchez-Sánchez, R. et al. Dev. Dyn. 241, 953–964 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Krishnaswami, K., Qiao, H., Bernacki, B.E. & Anheier, N.C. Jr. in Laser Technology for Defense and Security V Vol. 7325 (eds. Dubinskii, M. & Post, S.G.), 73250Z (SPIE, 2009).

  25. Nallala, J. et al. J. Biomed. Opt. 17, 116013 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hirschmugl, C.J. & Gough, K.M. Appl. Spectrosc. 66, 475–491 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Levenson, E., Lerch, P. & Martin, M.C. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 15, 323–328 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mattson, E.C., Unger, M., Manandhar, B., Alavi, Z. & Hirschmugl, C.J. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 425, 142001 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dumas, P., Jamin, N., Teillaud, J.L., Miller, L.M. & Beccard, B. Faraday Discuss. 126, 289–302 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin, M.C. & Dumas, P. in Spectroscopic Properties of Inorganic and Organometallic Compounds: Techniques, Materials and Applications Vol. 43 (eds. Yarwood, J., Douthwaite, R. & Duckett, S.B.) 141–165 (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2012).

  31. Martin, M.C., Schade, U., Lerch, P. & Dumas, P. Trends Analyt. Chem. 29, 453–463 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Crowther, R., DeRosier, D.J. & Klug, A. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 317, 319–340 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fessler, J.A., Ficaro, E.P., Clinthorne, N.H. & Lange, K. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16, 166–175 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Erdogan, H. & Fessler, J.A. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18, 801–814 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Erdogan, H. & Fessler, J.A. Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 2835–2851 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fessler, J.A. & Rogers, W.L. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 5, 1346–1358 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Stayman, J.W. & Fessler, J.A. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19, 601–615 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ying, Q.-L., Nichols, J., Chambers, I. & Smith, A. Cell 115, 281–292 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Maltsev, V.A., Rohwedel, J., Hescheler, J. & Wobus, A.M. Mech. Dev. 44, 41–50 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Castro, J.M. & Dingwell, D.B. Nature 461, 780–783 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Castro, J.M., Manga, M. & Martin, M.C. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L21307 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to K. Krueger, M. Fisher and G. Rogers for outstanding machining skills and technical support. We also thank D. Ron for assistance on the spectral extractions. This work is based on research conducted at the IRENI beamline, whose construction and development was supported by the US National Science Foundation by award MRI-0619759. This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation under grant CHE-1112433. The ALS is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The SRC is primarily funded by the University of Wisconsin–Madison, with supplemental support from facility users and the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.C.M. and C.J.H. conceived of the technique and led the project. C.D.-B. wrote automated data analysis code and carried out some of the experiments. M.J.N. wrote scripts to automate the data collection at IRENI. M.U. and J.S. helped perform all experiments. D.Y.P. provided tomographic reconstruction algorithms and expert advice on setting up the experiments. H.A.B. provided optical mount expertise and assistance with analysis codes. B.I. provided Populus samples and helped perform experiments and analysis of these samples. J.M.C. provided the volcanic samples and expertise for their analysis. M.K. provided the Zinnia samples and expertise for their analysis. D.B. and B.O. provided embryoid body colony samples and expertise for their analysis. All authors helped with writing this paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Michael C Martin or Carol J Hirschmugl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–5 and Supplementary Note (PDF 698 kb)

Tomographic reconstruction of a Zinnia elegans tracheary element inside a polyimide microloop holder shown in Figure 1

The red color shows the reconstruction of the integrated intensity from the 2356.7–2376.0 cm−1 spectral region, where only the sharp edges of the microloop are visualized. After a little time, the blue-green colors are turned on that show the reconstruction of the 3317–3340 cm−1 spectral region associated with O-H stretching. The parallel secondary cell wall thickenings of the Zinnia elegans are now clearly visualized. (MOV 331 kb)

3D reconstruction of a Populus wood sample in Figure 2, shown rotating

The brown colors are reconstructed intensities of hydrocarbon stretching absorption modes in the 2804–3023 cm−1 spectral range. The blue-green colors are associated with holocellulose (1689–1781 cm−1). (MOV 1769 kb)

Movie of the full tomographic reconstructions obtained from an intact human hair from Figure 3 showing absorptions of protein (red) and phospholipid (blue-green)

The medulla is observed to have little protein as we see the protein reconstruction is indeed hollow, but it instead has higher concentrations of phospholipids. (MOV 620 kb)

Movie of the full tomographic reconstructions obtained from mouse stem cells from Figure 4 showing absorptions of protein (blue-red) and lipids (yellow-brown)

The movie starts showing on the protein distribution, then the lipids turn on and we see the overlapping distributions, and finally the proteins turn off to show the lipid distribution. (MOV 2990 kb)

Video showing the tomographic reconstruction of the integrated absorption in the 1573–1654 cm−1 spectral range for a polyimide microloop

Static images from this movie are shown in the top row of Supplementary Figure 2. (MOV 722 kb)

Video of the reconstructed volcanic glass sample shown in Supplementary Figures 4 and 5

The red-brown colors show the 1790 cm−1 absorptive regions, and the blue-green colors are the 3494 cm−1 absorptive regions superimposed on each other. The blue-green is dominated by water absorptions, (due to the combined H2O and OH stretching vibrations), whereas the red-brown regions are predominately the edge of the strong silicate glass absorption. The white space between has low absorbance at both spectral regions. (MOV 1102 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, M., Dabat-Blondeau, C., Unger, M. et al. 3D spectral imaging with synchrotron Fourier transform infrared spectro-microtomography. Nat Methods 10, 861–864 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2596

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2596

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing