In an attempt to broaden the current debate over proposed revisions to the Declaration of Helsinki, we define vulnerable subjects as those lacking basic rights, and examine the ethical risks inherent in research on such subjects. We then propose special ethical criteria for the conduct and publication of research on vulnerable subjects.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Exploring traditional medicine utilisation during antenatal care among women in Bulilima District of Plumtree in Zimbabwe
Scientific Reports Open Access 25 March 2021
-
Traditional medicine utilisation and maternal complications during antenatal care among women in Bulilima, Plumtree, Zimbabwe
Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology Open Access 09 February 2021
-
An Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research
Asian Bioethics Review Open Access 01 September 2019
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Lurie, P. & Wolfe, S. Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries. N. Engl. J. Med. 337, 853– 855 (1997).
Shue, H. Basic Rights. Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy 20 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1996).
French, H. Aids research in Africa: Juggling risk and hopes. New York Times , A1 (9 October 1997 ).
Acknowledgements
This paper was developed from an address entitled “Issues Raised by the Helsinki Declaration” by B.L. at a symposium held to review proposals for change to the Helsinki Declaration (Melbourne, Australia, 30 August 1999). The authors acknowledge the discussion of these issues at a meeting held to prepare for the Melbourne Symposium on the Declaration of Helsinki; participants included J. Oakley (Director, Centre for Human Bioethics, Monash University), J. Black (National Health and Medical Research Council Scholar, Dept. of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University), I. Kerridge (Director, Clinical Unit in Ethics and Health Law, University of Newcastle) and H. McKelvie (Manager, Program Development, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zion, D., Gillam, L. & Loff, B. The Declaration of Helsinki, CIOMS and the ethics of research on vulnerable populations. Nat Med 6, 615–617 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/76174
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/76174
This article is cited by
-
Traditional medicine utilisation and maternal complications during antenatal care among women in Bulilima, Plumtree, Zimbabwe
Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology (2021)
-
Exploring traditional medicine utilisation during antenatal care among women in Bulilima District of Plumtree in Zimbabwe
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Ethically important moments – a pragmatic-dualist research ethics
Journal of Academic Ethics (2021)
-
An Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research
Asian Bioethics Review (2019)
-
The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines
Health Research Policy and Systems (2017)