Overwhelming evidence that relationships between universities, physicians and the medical products industry benefit patients explains the ubiquitous calls to encourage such relationships. Yet accumulating 'conflict of interest' regulations in academic health centers, government and industry have had the opposite effect. Justifications underlying the regulations lack quantitative rigor, and the rules they enforce impose costly bureaucratic requirements of dubious benefit. Evidence shows that they have diminished the collaborations deemed beneficial to health enhancement.
- J. Am. Med. Assoc. 269, 2782–2784 (1993).
- Perspect. Biol. Med. 50, 54–71 (2007).
- N. Engl. J. Med. 356, 1742–1750 (2007). et al.
- N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1060–1065 (2005).
- Acad. Med. 85, 80–84 (2010). , , &
- Am. J. Ther. 17, 101–120 (2010). , &
- J. Law Med. Ethics 37, 431–443 (2009).
- Yale J. Health Policy Law Ethics 10, 299–356 (2010).
- 2009). Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent. Ch. 3 (Encounter Books,
- Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education. Annual Report. http://www.accme.org/dir_docs/doc_upload/f2e89864-b4c1-428f-8ebe-1ba197a31928_uploaddocument.pdf (2009).
- J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 91, 1791–1805 (2009). &