Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis is characterized by synovial inflammation and destruction of joint cartilage and bone mediated by persistent synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases. Biological compounds that suppress the synthesis of key inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), are successful at treating rheumatoid arthritis in the short term. However, repeated treatments are required, rendering this an expensive therapeutic approach that does not lead to long-term remission. Total systemic suppression of cytokine function is not without inherent problems, such as increased infectious risk. Thus, despite advances in care, there remains an unmet need for an economical mode of treatment that is efficacious over the long term1, 2. However, a major obstacle lies in the fact that the mechanisms that underpin disease chronicity remain unclear, and the factor(s) that drive the prolonged expression of inflammatory and destructive mediators are unknown.
TLRs have a key role in driving inflammation, and blockade of TLR function may yield considerable clinical benefit3, 4. This receptor family mediates host defense against infection and injury by recognizing pathogen- and damage-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs and DAMPs)5. DAMPs are endogenous proinflammatory molecules generated upon tissue injury and include intracellular molecules released from necrotic cells, extracellular matrix fragments or extracellular matrix molecules upregulated upon injury6, 7. Upon activation, TLRs promote innate and adaptive immune responses, including induction of proinflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases8. TLRs are highly expressed in synovial tissue from individuals with rheumatoid arthritis9, 10, 11, 12, and mice with targeted deletions or loss-of-function mutations in Tlr4 are protected from experimental arthritis13, 14. Furthermore, inhibitors of TLR4 have reduced destructive arthritis in mice15 and improved symptoms in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in a preliminary phase 1 trial16.
However, it is unclear which TLR ligand(s) are involved in disease pathogenesis. Tenascin-C is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein associated with tissue injury and repair. It is not normally expressed in most adult tissues but is specifically and transiently upregulated during acute inflammation and persistently expressed in chronic inflammation17. Little tenascin-C is expressed in normal human joints, but expression is increased in synovia18, 19, 20, synovial fluid21, 22 and cartilage20, 21 from individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. It is a hexameric protein of 1.5 million Da that comprises an assembly domain, epidermal growth factor–like repeats (EGF-L), fibronectin type III–like repeats (TNIII) and a fibrinogen-like globe (FBG)23. The elevated amounts of tenascin-C in rheumatoid arthritis and the homology of tenascin-C domains to other known DAMPs prompted us to examine whether this molecule is a TLR ligand that contributes to the progression of inflammatory joint disease.
Results
Zymosan-induced inflammation is not sustained in Tnc-/- mice
We used zymosan to induce acute synovitis in mice. Wild-type mice showed rapid paw swelling that reached maximal diameter by 24 h and that was maintained for a further 24 h (Fig. 1a). After 2 d, the paw diameter decreased, but paws remained swollen at 4 d (Fig. 1a). There was no significant difference in the paw swelling of Tnc-/- mice compared to wild-type mice 24 h after injection (Fig. 1a). However, swelling subsided faster than in wild-type mice; paw diameter was significantly lower at 2 d and had declined to near basal levels by 4 d (Fig. 1a). By 4 d, the paws of wild-type mice were still visibly swollen and red, whereas the paws of Tnc-/- mice resembled noninjected paws (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Figure 1: Accelerated resolution of acute inflammation in Tnc-/- mice.
(a) Paw swelling in wild-type (+/+) and Tnc-/- (-/-) mice over time after injection of zymosan. Data are shown as the mean increase in paw diameter compared to paw diameter before injection
s.e.m. (n = 24 mice per genotype). **P < 0.01. (b–e) Representative sections of the ankle joints from wild-type (b,c) and Tnc-/- (d,e) mice 4 d after zymosan injection, stained with H&E (b,d) and safranin-O (c,e). Boxes highlight the joint synovium (s) and cartilage proteoglycan (cp). Scale bar, 250
m. (f) Quantification of joint inflammation and chondrocyte death in knee joints 4 d after injection with zymosan from wild-type mice and Tnc-/- mice. Data are expressed as the mean
s.d. (n = 24 mice per genotype). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Histologically, synovia of wild-type mice were substantially inflamed at 4 d, showing cellular infiltration and cartilage proteoglycan loss (Fig. 1b,c). In contrast, Tnc-/- mice showed no synovitis, cellular infiltrate or cartilage proteoglycan loss (Fig. 1d,e). There was little cellular exudate in either wild-type or Tnc-/- mice; however, cellular infiltration was significantly lower in Tnc-/- mice (Fig. 1f). No erosion of cartilage or bone occurred in mice of either genotype (data not shown); however, chondrocyte death occurred in wild-type but not Tnc-/- mice (Fig. 1f). Tenascin-C expression was elevated in the joints of wild-type mice 24 h after injection, and expression increased over time up to 4 d (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Induction of tenascin-C expression was specific to the zymosan-injected joint and was not observed in the contralateral, noninjected joint of the same mouse (data not shown). Thus, tenascin-C expression seems to promote the maintenance of acute inflammation.
Tnc-/- mice are protected from joint destruction
To determine whether tenascin-C contributes to more destructive inflammatory joint disease, we induced erosive arthritis by immunization and intra-articular injection with methylated BSA (mBSA) (Fig. 2), a model that induces pathological changes similar to human rheumatoid arthritis24. Cell infiltration and synovial thickening was apparent by 24 h in mice of both genotypes (Fig. 2c–f,h,i) compared to sham-injected (Fig. 2a,b,g) or noninjected (data not shown) mice.
Figure 2: Synovial inflammation is induced in Tnc-/- mice upon injection of antigen.
(a,b) Representative sections of the knee joints of sham-injected wild-type mice. (c–f) Representative sections of the knee joints of wild-type (c,d) or Tnc-/- (e,f) mice 24 h after intra-articular injection of mBSA. Inflammatory cell infiltration is indicated in the capsule (cap), meniscus (M) and the joint space (J) of both wild-type and Tnc-/- mice. (g–i) Higher magnification images show the synovium of sham-injected wild-type mice (g), wild-type mice injected with mBSA (h) or Tnc-/- mice injected with mBSA (i). 'S' indicates the healthy synovium of sham-injected mice that is no more than 1–3 cells thick along the entire bone surface, and 'ST' highlights the synovia of wild-type and Tnc-/- mice, which are both considerably thickened. Sections are stained with H&E (a, c, e, g–i) and safranin-O (b,d,f). Scale bars, 250
m (a–f) and 50
m (g–i). n = 5 mice per genotype.
However, inflammation did not persist in Tnc-/- mice as it did in wild-type mice (Fig. 3). Wild-type mice showed increased inflammation of the meniscus and capsule, synovial hyperplasia, cell accumulation and fibrin deposits in the joint space, pannus formation, and localized cartilage proteoglycan loss 3 d after injection (Fig. 3a,b,f). In contrast, in Tnc-/- mice, inflammation was limited to the capsule, synovial inflammation had subsided, and there were no fibrin or cell aggregates present in the joint space, as well as no pannus formation and no proteoglycan loss (Fig. 3c–e).
Figure 3: Synovial inflammation subsides rapidly in Tnc-/- mice.
(a–f) Representative sections of the knee joints of wild-type (a,b,f) or Tnc-/- (c,d,e) mice 3 d after intra-articular injection of mBSA. The line in a and c highlights increased inflammation of the capsule in wild-type mice compared to Tnc-/- mice. 'cp' highlights increased cartilage proteoglycan loss in wild-type mice compared to Tnc-/- mice. In e and f, substantial synovial hyperplasia is indicated by the line, cell and fibrin deposits in the joint space are indicated by the arrow, and pannus invasion is indicated by arrowheads. Sections are stained with H&E (a,c,e,f) and safranin-O (b,d). Scale bars, 250
m (a–d) and 100
m (e–f). n = 5 mice per genotype.
By 7 d, wild-type mice showed persistent inflammatory cell infiltration and joint space exudate, extensive synovitis and pannus formation and destruction of articular cartilage and bone erosion (Fig. 4a,b). However, Tnc-/- mice had healthy joints that showed only mild inflammatory cell infiltration, with no joint space exudate, synovitis, pannus formation, destruction of articular cartilage or bone erosion (Fig. 4c,d).
Figure 4: Tnc-/- mice are protected from tissue destruction, and tenascin-C induces cytokine synthesis in primary human cells.
(a–d) Representative sections of the knee joints of wild-type (a,b) and Tnc-/- (c,d) mice 7 d after intra-articular injection of mBSA, stained with H&E (a,c) and safranin-O (b,d). Scale bar, 250
m. n = 24 mice per genotype. Arrowhead indicates area of bone erosion. Arrow indicates pannus invasion into articular cartilage. 'J' indicates the joint space, and 'AC' indicates the intact articular cartilage. (e) Quantification of knee joint inflammation, chondrocyte death, cartilage surface erosion and bone erosion in wild-type mice (+/+) and Tnc-/- mice (-/-). Data represent the mean
s.d. n = 5 per genotype (24 h, 3 d) or 24 per genotype (7 d). Cartilage surface erosion and bone erosion are shown at 7 d only. (f,g) IL-6, IL-8 and TNF synthesis by primary human macrophages (f) and synovial fibroblasts (g) that were either unstimulated (no addition) or stimulated with LPS (1 ng ml-1 (f) or 10 ng ml-1 (g) or recombinant tenascin-C (1.0
M–1.0 nM) for 24 h. Data are shown as the mean of triplicate values
s.d. from one of three representative experiments. (h) IL-6 synthesis by primary human macrophages that were either unstimulated (no addition) or stimulated with LPS (1 ng ml-1) or recombinant tenascin-C (1.0
M) for 24 h. Cells were preincubated with medium alone (-) or with polymyxin B (P) before stimulation, or they were incubated with heat-denatured LPS or tenascin-C (H). Data are shown as the mean of triplicate values
s.d. from one of three representative experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
These histological data are reflected in the scoring of joint disease. Cellular infiltrate and exudate were not significantly different in wild-type and Tnc-/- mice 24 h after injection (Fig 4e). Cellular mass continued to increase in wild-type mice over time but was attenuated in Tnc-/- mice (Fig. 4e). Increasing chondrocyte death and cartilage and bone erosion occurred in wild-type mice but was not present in Tnc-/- mice (Fig. 4e). These data indicate that whereas the initiation of joint inflammation is unaffected in Tnc-/- mice, disease does not progress to tissue destruction and cell death. Tenascin-C expression was elevated in the joints of wild-type mice 24 h and 3 d after injection and was maintained up to 7 d (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Induction of tenascin-C expression was specific to the mBSA-injected joint and was not observed in the contralateral, noninjected joint of the same mouse data (not shown). These results indicate that expression of tenascin-C is required for persistent synovial inflammation and joint destruction in this model.
Tenascin-C induces cytokine synthesis in primary human cells
We next investigated whether tenascin-C can activate the innate immune response. Exogenously added tenascin-C stimulated proinflammatory cytokine synthesis in primary human macrophages and synovial fibroblasts in a cell type–specific manner that was markedly different from that of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Fig. 4f,g). Tenascin-C induced tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-8 production in a dose-dependent fashion in human macrophages (Fig. 4f). However, tenascin-C induced only IL-6 synthesis in synovial fibroblasts, whereas LPS induced both IL-6 and IL-8 (Fig. 4g). Neither LPS nor tenascin-C induced TNF-
synthesis in fibroblasts (data not shown).
Tenascin-C–mediated stimulation of IL-6 (Fig. 4h), IL-8 and TNF-
production by human macrophages and IL-6 by synovial fibroblasts (data not shown) was heat sensitive and unaffected by the LPS inhibitor polymyxin B. Together, these results provide strong evidence that cytokine induction by tenascin-C is not due to LPS contamination.
The FBG domain of tenascin-C mediates cell activation
Tenascin-C is a large molecule, each domain of which binds to a different cell surface receptor23. To identify which domains are crucial for promoting cytokine production, we synthesized recombinant proteins comprising the various domains of the molecule (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4). Each domain preparation contained <10 pg ml-1 LPS. Only one domain of tenascin-C was active. The FBG domain stimulated TNF-
(Fig. 5a), IL-6 and IL-8 (data not shown) synthesis in human macrophages and IL-6 synthesis in synovial fibroblasts (data not shown) to an equal extent to full-length tenascin-C. Like full-length tenascin-C, FBG did not induce IL-8 synthesis in synovial fibroblasts, whereas LPS did (data not shown). FBG-induced cytokine synthesis was also heat sensitive and unaffected by polymyxin B (data not shown).
Figure 5: The FBG domain of tenascin-C mediates stimulation of cytokine synthesis in vivo and in vitro.
(a) TNF synthesis by primary human macrophages that were either unstimulated (no addition) or stimulated with LPS (1 ng ml-1), 1.0
M recombinant tenascin-C (TNC) or 1.0
M tenascin-C domains (assembly domain (TA), EGF-L, TNIII 1–5, TNIII 1–3, TNIII 3–5, TNIII 5–7, TNIII 6–8 and FBG) for 24 h. Data are shown as the mean of triplicate values
s.d. from one of three representative experiments. (b) IL-6, IL-8 and TNF synthesis by synovial membrane cells that were either unstimulated (no addition) or stimulated with LPS (10 ng ml-1) or recombinant FBG (1.0–0.01
M) for 24 h. Data are shown as the mean percentage change in cytokine abundance compared to unstimulated cells
s.e.m. from five different subjects. (c–h) Representative sections of the knee joints of wild-type mice 3 d after intra-articular injection of PBS (c,e,g) or 1
g FBG (d,f,h). Sections are stained with H&E (c–f) or safranin-O (g,h). Scale bar, 250
m (c,d) and 100
m (e–h) (n = 5 mice per genotype). (i) Quantification of joint inflammation, bone erosion, cartilage surface erosion and chondrocyte death in the knee joints of wild-type mice 3 d after intra-articular injection of PBS (PBS) or 1
g FBG (FBG). Data represent the mean
s.d. (n = 5 per genotype). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
We also investigated whether FBG could promote expression of inflammatory cytokines in synovial membranes from individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. This tissue model of rheumatoid arthritis (comprising a mixed population of all synovial cell types) spontaneously produces high amounts of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-
25 (Fig. 5b). FBG further enhanced synthesis of all of these cytokines (Fig. 5b).
FBG induces joint inflammation in mice in vivo
To determine whether FBG could induce inflammation in vivo, we injected wild-type mice intra-articularly with FBG. We observed a dose-dependent stimulation of joint inflammation (Fig. 5). No inflammation or proteoglycan loss occurred in noninjected mice or in mice injected with PBS (Fig. 5c,e,g) or 100 ng FBG (data not shown). However, injection of 1
g FBG induced inflammatory cell infiltration (Fig. 5d), mild synovitis, pannus formation (Fig. 5f) and proteoglycan loss (Fig. 5h). We observed a similar response upon injection with 3
g FBG (data not shown).
Upon histological quantification, we found high levels of cellular infiltrate and exudate and chondrocyte death, together with a modest amount of cartilage and bone damage in mice injected with FBG (Fig. 5i).
FBG-mediated cytokine synthesis is dependent on Myd88
Many DAMPs have been shown to activate TLRs. Therefore, we investigated whether TLRs might also mediate tenascin-C–induced cytokine production. Myeloid differentiation factor-88 (MyD88) is required for signaling by all TLRs except TLR3 (ref. 4). Infection of synovial fibroblasts with adenovirus expressing dominant-negative MyD88 abolished FBG induction of IL-6 (Fig. 6a), suggesting that FBG action is dependent on functional MyD88. FBG action is not mediated by IL-1, as addition of IL-1 receptor antagonist did not inhibit induction of cytokines (data not shown).
Figure 6: FBG-mediated cytokine synthesis is MyD88 and TLR4 dependent.
(a) IL-6 synthesis by synovial fibroblasts that were either uninfected or infected with adenovirus expressing GFP (AdGFP) or dominant-negative MyD88 (AdMyD88dn). Cells were unstimulated, stimulated with LPS (10 ng ml-1) or stimulated with FBG (1
M) for 24 h. (b) IL-6 synthesis by mouse embryonic fibroblasts isolated from wild-type (Myd88+/+) or Myd88-/- mice that were either unstimulated (-) or stimulated with PAM3 (100 ng ml-1), LPS (100 ng ml-1), TNF-
(100 ng ml-1), IL-1 (5 ng ml-1) or FBG (1
M) for 24 h. (c) TNF synthesis by macrophages that were preincubated with medium alone, medium containing function-blocking antibodies to TLR2 (10
g ml-1) or TLR4 (25
g ml-1) or isotype control antibodies (25
g ml-1) for 30 min before stimulation. Cells were unstimulated or stimulated with LPS (1 ng ml-1), FBG (1
M) or PAM3 (10 ng ml-1) for 24 h. (d) IL-6 synthesis by mouse embryonic fibroblasts isolated from wild-type, Tlr2-/- or Tlr4-/- mice that were either unstimulated or stimulated with PAM3 (100 ng ml-1), LPS (100 ng ml-1), IL-1 (5 ng ml-1) and FBG (1
M) for 24 h. (e) IL-6 synthesis by bone marrow–derived macrophages isolated from wild-type, Tlr2-/- or Tlr4-/- mice that were either unstimulated or stimulated with PAM3 (100 ng ml-1), LPS (100 ng ml-1) or FBG (1
M) for 24 h. (f) TNF synthesis by human macrophages that were preincubated with no inhibitor, 1
g ml-1 msbB LPS or 10
g ml-1 antibodies to CD14 for 30 min before stimulation with LPS (1 ng ml-1), FBG (1
M) or PAM3 (10 ng ml-1) for 24 h. In all panels, data are shown as the mean of three independent experiments
s.e.m. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Confirming that FBG action is MyD88 dependent, we found that FBG does not stimulate cytokine synthesis in embryonic fibroblasts isolated from Myd88-/- mice (Fig. 6b). The TLR2 ligand Pam3Cys-Ser-Lys4 (PAM3), the TLR4 ligand LPS and IL-1 all signal via MyD88. Stimulation with these ligands was also abolished in Myd88-/- mouse embryonic fibroblasts (Fig. 6b). However, stimulation by exogenously added TNF-
, which does not signal via MyD88, was unaffected in these cells (Fig. 6b). Retransfection of wild-type MyD88 restored the responsiveness of these cells to FBG, PAM3, LPS and IL-1 (data not shown).
FBG signals via TLR4
TLRs show specificity for endogenous ligands; proteins are recognized by TLR2, TLR4 or both4. Neutralizing antibodies to TLR4 inhibited FBG- and LPS-induced IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-
synthesis in human macrophages and IL-6 synthesis in synovial fibroblasts but had no effect on stimulation with PAM3 (Fig. 6c). Antibodies to TLR2 inhibited PAM3-mediated cytokine synthesis but had no effect on LPS- or FBG-mediate cytokine synthesis (Fig. 6c). (TNF-
synthesis by human macrophages is shown in Fig. 6c.) Confirming that FBG action is TLR4 dependent, we found that FBG does not stimulate cytokine synthesis in embryonic fibroblasts or macrophages isolated from Tlr4-/- mice (Fig. 6d,e). Embryonic fibroblasts or macrophages isolated from Tlr2-/- mice were unresponsive to PAM3 but were responsive to FBG, LPS and IL-1 (Fig. 6d,e). Cells isolated from Tlr4-/- mice were unresponsive to LPS but did respond to PAM3 and IL-1 (Fig. 6d,e).
In addition, expression of TLR4 was required for the arthritogenic action of FBG in vivo; FBG induced joint inflammation in Tlr2-/- mice but not in Tlr4-/- mice (Supplementary Fig. 5). We also found that TLR4 is involved in the progression of antigen-induced arthritis. Tlr4-/- mice show less joint inflammation and are protected from chondrocyte death and cartilage and bone erosion compared to wild-type mice (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Different co-receptor requirements for FBG and LPS
LPS signaling via TLR4 is mediated by a receptor complex including myeloid differentiation protein-2 (MD-2) and CD14 (ref. 26). We next examined whether CD14 and MD-2 are required for FBG activation of TLR4. As a positive control, here we examined the activity of smooth glycosylated LPS, which requires both MD-2 and CD14 for its action27. LPS-mediated IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-
synthesis by human macrophages and IL-6 synthesis by synovial fibroblasts was inhibited by antibodies to CD14 and an antagonistic LPS derived from the msbB strain of Escherichia coli, which competes for LPS binding to MD-2 (ref. 28) (Fig. 6f). Conversely, cytokine synthesis mediated by both PAM3, which does not require these co-receptors for activation of TLR2, and FBG was unaffected by antibodies to CD14 or msbB mutant LPS (Fig. 6f shows TNF-
synthesis by human macrophages). These data suggest that neither CD14 nor MD-2 is required for FBG-mediated cytokine synthesis. Therefore, whereas LPS and FBG both signal via activation of TLR4, they may have different co-receptor requirements.
Discussion
The goal to improve therapies for rheumatoid arthritis has been hampered by the unanswered question of what factors drive the chronic production of inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases. The discovery that TLRs, key mediators of the inflammatory response, are activated by endogenous ligands raised the possibility that these receptors could be involved in chronic 'sterile' inflammation. Although many studies have supported a role for TLRs in rheumatoid arthritis4, little is known about which ligands may be present in rheumatoid joints. This study has identified a novel role for tenascin-C as an endogenous activator of TLR4 and has demonstrated that tenascin-C is required for destructive joint inflammation.
We showed a role for tenascin-C in mediating joint inflammation in vivo by intra-articular injection of the FBG domain of tenascin-C in mice. Moreover, our data show that tenascin-C does not seem to be involved in the initiation of inflammation but that it is required for the maintenance of joint inflammation. The key role of tenascin-C in prolonging joint inflammation was underscored by the protection of Tnc-/- mice from sustained and erosive joint inflammation.
We have shown here that tenascin-C is capable of activating cells in the joint and have mapped the active domain of tenascin-C to the FBG, a 227–amino acid (26.9 kDa) globular domain at the carboxy terminus of the molecule29. FBG enhanced spontaneous release of proinflammatory cytokines from synovial membrane cultures from individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. It also stimulated synthesis of TNF-
, IL-6 and IL-8 in primary human macrophages and IL-6 in synovial fibroblasts via activation of TLR4- and MyD88-dependent signaling pathways. FBG stimulation of TLR4 was not due to LPS contamination. Each protein preparation contained <10 pg ml-1 LPS, which is below the level of detection of the cells used in this study. In addition, we synthesized each recombinant tenascin-C domain in the same manner, yet only FBG was active. FBG was not inhibited by polymyxin B at concentrations that blocked the action of 1–10 ng ml-1 LPS. Furthermore, heat inactivation did not affect LPS stimulation of cytokine synthesis, whereas FBG was rendered inactive. Finally, the profile and magnitude of cytokine induction by FBG was markedly different from that of LPS.
Our data support emerging evidence that each TLR4 ligand activates a specific TLR4 receptor complex. Similarly to the case for LPS, TLR4 expression is necessary for induction of cytokine synthesis by FBG. However, unlike the case for LPS, neither CD14 nor MD-2 seems to be required for TLR4 activation. CD14 is not required for TLR4 to respond to lipid A in a MyD88-dependent manner27, for fibronectin extra domain A to activate mast cells30 or for hyaluronic acid to activate human monocytic THP-1 cells, although the latter activation does require TLR4, CD44 and MD-2 (ref. 31). Formation of distinct receptor complexes by each TLR4 ligand may facilitate recruitment of numerous intracellular adaptor or signaling molecules. This may account for the differential cellular responses that we observe with FBG and LPS—for example, lack of IL-8 induction by FBG in synovial fibroblasts. Similarly, hyaluronic acid activation of TLR4 and CD44 induces a pattern of gene expression in mouse alveolar macrophage cell lines that is different from that induced by LPS31. The fact that FBG induces IL-8 synthesis in human macrophages suggests that cell type–specific ligand recognition, signaling or both occurs. Crystallization of the TLR4 ectodomain, MD-2 and the LPS analog eritoran in complex supports data that LPS does not bind TLR4 directly32; however, biglycan can be immunoprecipitated with both TLR2 and TLR4 (ref. 33). Future work is required to determine whether FBG directly interacts with TLR4 as well as to identify additional accessory molecules and co-receptors for FBG in specific cell types.
In addition to tenascin-C, other endogenous TLR ligands are expressed in the rheumatoid joint, including heat shock proteins, high-mobility group B-1 (HMGB-1), S100 proteins, and hyaluronic acid34. It is likely that more than one of these ligands contribute to activation of TLRs. HMGB-1, a ubiquitously expressed nuclear protein that is released from cells upon injury, can stimulate macrophages derived from the synovial fluid of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis35. It also triggers inflammatory cell infiltration and synovitis upon intra-articular injection into mice36, and blockade of HMGB-1 inhibits inflammation and tissue destruction in collagen-induced arthritis in mice37. However, here we show not only that exogenous tenascin-C stimulates joint inflammation but also that endogenous tenascin-C is required for the persistence of synovial inflammation and the onset of joint tissue destruction in vivo.
The tightly regulated pattern of expression of tenascin-C makes it an attractive candidate for driving chronic inflammation. It is predominantly absent from healthy adults but is specifically induced upon tissue injury. During acute inflammation, tenascin-C is transiently expressed: induction often precedes inflammation, and both mRNA and protein are absent from the tissue by the time inflammation is resolved17. Persistent expression of tenascin-C is associated with chronic inflammation. In addition to rheumatoid arthritis, increased tenascin-C levels are observed in autoimmune diseases including multiple sclerosis38 and Sjogren's syndrome39 and in nonhealing wounds and diabetic and venous ulcers40. Tenascin-C levels correlate well inflammatory activity in oral mucosal and inflammatory bowel disease17.
Together, these data indicate a potential role for tenascin-C in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, where its induction upon tissue injury creates a perpetual destructive cycle. Amplification of the inflammatory response by tenascin-C may lead to provocation of chronic inflammation, in which damage created by inflammation leads to the induction of further endogenous activators of inflammation. Understanding the mechanism by which endogenous molecules such as tenascin-C mediate persistent inflammation may offer the potential to suppress erroneous inflammation while preserving signals required for host defense against microbial infection.
Note: Supplementary information is available on the Nature Medicine website.


