Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Technical Report
  • Published:

A method for quantifying normal human mammary epithelial stem cells with in vivo regenerative ability

Nature Medicine volume 14, pages 1384–1389 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that normal mouse mammary tissue contains a rare subset of mammary stem cells. We now describe a method for detecting an analogous subpopulation in normal human mammary tissue. Dissociated cells are suspended with fibroblasts in collagen gels, which are then implanted under the kidney capsule of hormone-treated immunodeficient mice. After 2–8 weeks, the gels contain bilayered mammary epithelial structures, including luminal and myoepithelial cells, their in vitro clonogenic progenitors and cells that produce similar structures in secondary transplants. The regenerated clonogenic progenitors provide an objective indicator of input mammary stem cell activity and allow the frequency and phenotype of these human mammary stem cells to be determined by limiting-dilution analysis. This new assay procedure sets the stage for investigations of mechanisms regulating normal human mammary stem cells (and possibly stem cells in other tissues) and their relationship to human cancer stem cell populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Organized structures are generated in vivo from single-cell suspensions of primary human mammary cells.
Figure 2: CFC production in vivo as an indicator of human MRU repopulating activity.
Figure 3: MRUs are CD49f+EpCAMneg–low.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stingl, J., Eaves, C.J., Zandieh, I. & Emerman, J.T. Characterization of bipotent mammary epithelial progenitor cells in normal adult human breast tissue. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 67, 93–109 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Raouf, A. et al. Transcriptome analysis of the normal human mammary cell commitment and differentiation process. Cell Stem Cell 3, 109–118 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kordon, E.C. & Smith, G.H. An entire functional mammary gland may comprise the progeny from a single cell. Development 125, 1921–1930 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stingl, J. et al. Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells. Nature 439, 993–997 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shackleton, M. et al. Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell. Nature 439, 84–88 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsai, Y.C. et al. Contiguous patches of normal human mammary epithelium derived from a single stem cell: implications for breast carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 56, 402–404 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuperwasser, C. et al. Reconstruction of functionally normal and malignant human breast tissues in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4966–4971 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginestier, C. et al. ALDH1 is a maker of normal and cancer breast stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell 1, 555–567 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stingl, J., Raouf, A., Emerman, J.T. & Eaves, C.J. Epithelial progenitors in the normal human mammary gland. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 10, 49–59 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parmar, H. et al. A novel method for growing human breast epithelium in vivo using mouse and human mammary fibroblasts. Endocrinology 143, 4886–4896 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Laidlaw, I.J. et al. The proliferation of normal human breast tissue implanted into athymic nude mice is stimulated by estrogen but not progesterone. Endocrinology 136, 164–171 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonnefoix, T., Bonnefoix, P., Verdiel, P. & Sotto, J.J. Fitting limiting dilution experiments with generalized linear models results in a test of the single-hit Poisson assumption. J. Immunol. Methods 194, 113–119 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koukoulis, G.K. et al. Immunohistochemical localization of integrins in the normal, hyperplastic, and neoplastic breast. Correlations with their functions as receptors and cell adhesion molecules. Am. J. Pathol. 139, 787–799 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. O'Hare, M.J., Ormerod, M.G., Monaghan, P., Lane, E.B. & Gusterson, B.A. Characterization in vitro of luminal and myoepithelial cells isolated from the human mammary gland by cell sorting. Differentiation 46, 209–221 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, C.L. & Eaves, C.J. in Methods in Molecular Medicine: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Protocols. (eds. Klug, C.A. & Jordan, C.T.) 123–141 (Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sutherland, H.J., Eaves, C.J., Eaves, A.C., Dragowska, W. & Lansdorp, P.M. Characterization and partial purification of human marrow cells capable of initiating long-term hematopoiesis in vitro. Blood 74, 1563–1570 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ploemacher, R.E., Van Der Sluijs, J.P., Voerman, J.S.A. & Brons, N.H.C. An in vitro limiting-dilution assay of long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells in the mouse. Blood 74, 2755–2763 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eaves, C.J. et al. Regulation of primitive human hematopoietic cells in long-term marrow culture. Semin. Hematol. 28, 126–131 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Latza, U., Niedobitek, G., Schwarting, R., Nekarda, H. & Stein, H. Ber-EP4: new monoclonal antibody which distinguishes epithelia from mesothelia. J. Clin. Pathol. 43, 213–219 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stingl, J., Eaves, C.J., Kuusk, U. & Emerman, J.T. Phenotypic and functional characterization in vitro of a multipotent epithelial cell present in the normal adult human breast. Differentiation 63, 201–213 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Villadsen, R. et al. Evidence for a stem cell hierarchy in the adult human breast. J. Cell Biol. 177, 87–101 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cariati, M. et al. α-6 integrin is necessary for the tumourigenicity of a stem cell–like subpopulation within the MCF7 breast cancer cell line. Int. J. Cancer 122, 298–304 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stingl, J., Emerman, J.T. & Eaves, C.J. in Methods in Molecular Biology: Basic Cell Culture Protocols. (eds. Helgason, C.D. & Miller, C.L.) 249–263 (Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Richards, J. et al. Method for culturing mammary epithelial cells in a rat tail collagen gel matrix. Methods Cell Sci. 8, 31–36 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

C3H 10T1/2 mouse embryonic fibroblasts were a kind gift from G. Cunha, University of California, San Francisco. The authors acknowledge the excellent technical contributions of D. Wilkinson, G. Edin, the staff of the Flow Cytometry Facility of the Terry Fox Laboratory and the Centre for Translational and Applied Genomics. Mammoplasty tissue was obtained with the assistance of J. Sproul, P. Lennox, N. Van Laeken and R. Warren. This project was funded by grants from Genome British Columbia and Genome Canada, the Canadian Stem Cell Network and the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation British Columbia and Yukon Division. P.E. was a recipient of a US Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program Studentship, a Terry Fox Foundation Research Studentship from the National Cancer Institute of Canada, a Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce interdisciplinary award and a Canadian Stem Cell Network Studentship. J.S. held a Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation British Columbia and Yukon Division Fellowship and a Canadian National Science and Engineering Research Council Industrial Fellowship. A.R. held a Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation British Columbia and Yukon Division Fellowship and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fellowship. G.T. holds a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Pathology Training Fellowship. S.A. is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Molecular Oncology. The Centre for Translational and Applied Genomics laboratory is supported by a Canadian Institutes for Health Research Resource award.

Author information

Author notes

  1. John Stingl

    Present address: Present address: Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.,

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Terry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 675 West Tenth Avenue, Vancouver, V5Z 1L3, British Columbia, Canada

    Peter Eirew, John Stingl, Afshin Raouf & Connie J Eaves

  2. Molecular Oncology and Breast Cancer Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 675 West Tenth Avenue, Vancouver, V5Z 1L3, British Columbia, Canada

    Gulisa Turashvili & Samuel Aparicio

  3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, V6T 2B5, British Columbia, Canada

    Samuel Aparicio

  4. Department of Cellular & Physiological Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, British Columbia, Canada

    Joanne T Emerman

  5. Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, British Columbia, Canada

    Connie J Eaves

Authors
  1. Peter Eirew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Stingl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Afshin Raouf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gulisa Turashvili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Samuel Aparicio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joanne T Emerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Connie J Eaves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.E. designed and conducted most of the experiments and drafted the manuscript. J.S. initiated the work that led to the gel implant protocol, undertook preliminary experiments and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. A.R. critiqued the manuscript and participated in discussions of the experiments. G.T. and S.A. reviewed the histological preparations and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. J.T.E. helped organize the accrual of the mammoplasty material used. C.J.E. conceptualized the study and finalized the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Connie J Eaves.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1 (PDF 99 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eirew, P., Stingl, J., Raouf, A. et al. A method for quantifying normal human mammary epithelial stem cells with in vivo regenerative ability. Nat Med 14, 1384–1389 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1791

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1791

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing