Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The transcription factor DREAM represses the deubiquitinase A20 and mediates inflammation

Subjects

Abstract

Here we found that the transcription repressor DREAM bound to the promoter of the gene encoding A20 to repress expression of this deubiquitinase that suppresses inflammatory NF-κB signaling. DREAM-deficient mice displayed persistent and unchecked A20 expression in response to endotoxin. DREAM functioned by transcriptionally repressing A20 through binding to downstream regulatory elements (DREs). In contrast, binding of the transcription factor USF1 to the DRE-associated E-box domain in the gene encoding A20 activated its expression in response to inflammatory stimuli. Our studies define the critical opposing functions of DREAM and USF1 in inhibiting and inducing A20 expression, respectively, and thereby the strength of NF-κB signaling. Targeting of DREAM to induce USF1-mediated A20 expression is therefore a potential anti-inflammatory strategy for the treatment of diseases associated with unconstrained NF-κB activity, such as acute lung injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Deletion of Dream prevents endotoxin-induced lung inflammatory injury and sepsis-induced mortality.
Figure 2: DREAM and USF1 coordinate TNFAIP3 transcription.
Figure 3: Regulation of Tnfaip3 transcription by DREAM and USF1 in Dream−/− mice.
Figure 4: DREAM deficiency in mice augments basal and induced A20 expression.
Figure 5: DREAM deletion attenuates the TNF-induced activation of TAK1 and IKK in LECs.
Figure 6: DREAM deletion attenuates TNF-induced Jnk and p38 MAPK activation in LECs.
Figure 7: DREAM regulates the expression of NF-κB signaling components and target genes differently.
Figure 8: Expression of wild-type DREAM restores NF-κB signaling components in DREAM-deficient LECs.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carrión, A.M., Link, W.A., Ledo, F., Mellstrom, B. & Naranjo, J.R. Dream is a Ca2+-regulated transcriptional repressor. Nature 398, 80–84 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carrión, A.M., Mellstrom, B. & Naranjo, J.R. Protein kinase A-dependent derepression of the human prodynorphin gene via differential binding to an intragenic silencer element. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6921–6929 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ledo, F., Carrion, A.M., Link, W.A., Mellistrom, B. & Naranjo, J.R. DREAM-αCREM interaction via leucine-charged domains derepresses downstream regulatory element-dependent transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 9120–9126 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, H.Y. et al. DREAM is a critical transcriptional repressor for pain modulation. Cell 108, 31–43 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Iadarola, M.J., Brady, L.S., Draisci, G. & Dubner, R. Enhancement of dynorphin gene expression in spinal cord following experimental inflammation: stimulus specificity, behavioral parameters and opioid receptor binding. Pain 35, 313–326 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Savignac, M. et al. Transcriptional repressor DREAM regulates T-lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine gene expression. EMBO J. 24, 3555–3564 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Savignac, M. et al. Increased B cell proliferation and reduced Ig production in DREAM transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 185, 7527–7536 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amir-Zilberstein, L. & Dikstein, R. Interplay between E-box and NF-κB in regulation of A20 gene by DRB sensitivity-inducing factor (DSIF). J. Biol. Chem. 283, 1317–1323 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayden, M.S. & Ghosh, S. Shared principles of NF-κB signaling. Cell 132, 344–362 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonizzi, G. & Karin, M. The two NF-κB activation pathways and their role in innate and adaptive immunity. Trends Immunol. 25, 280–288 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann, A. & Baltimore, D. Circuitry of nuclear factor κB signaling. Immunol. Rev. 210, 171–186 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bair, A.M. et al. Ca2+ entry via TRPC channels is necessary for thrombin-induced NF-κB activation in endothelial cells through AMP-activated protein kinase and protein kinase Cδ. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 563–574 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Werner, S.L. et al. Encoding NF-κB temporal control in response to TNF: distinct roles for the negative regulators IκBα and A20. Genes Dev. 22, 2093–2101 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Opipari, A.W. Jr., Hu, H.M., Yabkowitz, R. & Dixit, V.M. The A20 zinc finger protein protects cells from tumor necrosis factor cytotoxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12424–12427 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Song, H.Y., Rothe, M. & Goeddel, D.V. The tumor necrosis factor-inducible zinc finger protein A20 interacts with TRAF1/TRAF2 and inhibits NF-κB activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6721–6725 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wertz, I.E. et al. De-ubiquitination and ubiquitin ligase domains of A20 downregulate NF-κB signalling. Nature 430, 694–699 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boone, D.L. et al. The ubiquitin-modifying enzyme A20 is required for termination of Toll-like receptor responses. Nat. Immunol. 5, 1052–1060 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Coornaert, B., Carpentier, I. & Beyaert, R. A20:Central gatekeeper in inflammation and immunity. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 8217–8221 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hymowitz, S.G. & Wertz, I.E. A20: from ubquitin editing to tumor suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 332–341 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harhaj, E.W. & Dixit, V.M. Regulation of NF-κB by deubiquitinases. Immunol. Rev. 246, 107–124 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Skaug, B. et al. Direct, noncatalytic mechanism of IKK inhibition by A20. Mol. Cell 44, 559–571 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, E.G. et al. Failure to regulate TNF-induced NF-κB and cell death responses in A20-deficient mice. Science 289, 2350–2354 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li, H.L. et al. Targeted cardiac overexpression of A20 improves left ventricular performance and reduces compensatory hypertrophy after myocardial infarction. Circulation 115, 1885–1894 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolfrum, S., Teupser, D., Tan, M., Chen, K.Y. & Breslow, J.L. The protective effect of A20 on atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice is associated with reduced expression of NF-κB target genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18601–18606 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Haies, D.M., Gil, J. & Weibel, E.R. Morphometric study of rat lung cells. I. Numerical and dimensional characteristics of parenchymal population. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 123, 533–541 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao, Y.Y. et al. Endothelial cell-restricted disruption of FoxM1 impairs endothelial repair following LPS-induced vascular injury. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 2333–2343 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Deshmane, S.L., Kremlev, S., Amini, S. & Sawaya, B.E. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): an overview. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 29, 313–326 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou, M.Y. et al. In vivo expression of neutrophil inhibitory factor via gene transfer prevents LPS-induced lung neutrophil infiltration and injury by β2 integrin-dependent mechanism. J. Clin. Invest. 101, 2427–2437 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Broman, M.T. et al. Cdc42 regulates adherens junction stability and endothelial permeability by inducing α-catenin interaction with the vascular endothelial cadherin complex. Circ. Res. 98, 73–80 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sato, S. et al. Essential function for the kinase TAK1 in innate and adaptive immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 6, 1087–1095 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ye, X. et al. Divergent roles of endothelial NF-κB in multiple organ injury and bacterial clearance in mouse models of sepsis. J. Exp. Med. 205, 1303–1315 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghosh, S. & Hayden, M.S. New regulators of NF-κB in inflammation. Nat. Rev Immunol. 8, 837–848 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yin, X., Krikorian, P. & Logan, T. Induction of RIP-2 kinase by proinflammatory cytokines is mediated via NF-κB signaling pathways and involves a novel feed-forward regulatory mechanism. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 333, 251–259 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sakurai, H. Targeting of TAK1 in inflammatory disorders and cancer. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33, 522–530 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rey, S. et al. Synergistic effect of HIF-1α gene therapy and HIF-1-activated bone marrow-derived angiogenic cells in a mouse model of limb ischemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20399–20404 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Hickey, M.J. et al. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in endotoxemia: chimeric mice reveal different cellular sources in various tissues. FASEB J. 16, 1141–1143 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vogel, S.M. et al. Abrogation of thrombin-induced increase in pulmonary microvascular permeability in proteinase activated receptor-1 (PAR-1−/−) knockout mice. Physiol. Genomics 4, 137–145 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tiruppathi, C. et al. Impairment of store-operated Ca2+ entry in TRPC4−/− mice interferes with increase in lung microvascular permeability. Circ. Res. 91, 70–76 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, Y.L. et al. Innate immune function of the aherens junction protein p120-catenin in endothelial response to endotoxin. J. Immunol. 186, 3180–3187 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rittirsch, D., Huber-Lang, M.S., Flierl, M.A. & Ward, P.A. Immuno design of experimental sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture. Nat. Protoc. 4, 31–36 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Paria, B.C. et al. Ca2+ influx-induced by PAR-1 activates a feed forward mechanism of TRPC1 expression via NF-κB activation in endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 20715–20727 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gatta, R. & Mantovani, R. Single nucleosome ChIPs identify an extensive switch of acetyl marks on cell cycle promoters. Cell Cycle 9, 2149–2159 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.M. Penninger (Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences) for DREAM-deficient mice, and Y.B. Wu for help with the isolation and culture of LECs. Supported by the US National Institutes of Health (P01 HL077806).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.T., D.S., J.W.C., A.M. and A.B.M. designed the research; C.T., D.S., D.-M.W., J.X., V.S., P.B.T., B.P.C., R.K.M., A.D., Z.Q., K.B., Y.-Y.Z. and S.M.V. did the experiments; C.T. analyzed data; and C.T. and A.B.M. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chinnaswamy Tiruppathi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Wild type (WT) bone marrow cells fail to induce lung vascular injury in Dream–/– mice following LPS challenge.

a, At 3 weeks following bone marrow cells transplantation, recipient mouse blood was collected from by tail nick. DNA was isolated using blood cells from a recipient female or male mouse. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Sry gene (male specific) and autosomal gene Nme1 was performed to determine the reconstitution of bone marrow cells35. Representative PCR results are shown. Male-WT bone marrow (BM) cells transplanted recipient female Dream–/– mice were positive for Sry gene whereas female-WT bone marrow cells transplanted recipient male Dream–/– mice were negative for Sry gene. Positive and negative controls were included. b and c, WT, Dream–/–, or chimeric (WT-BM→ Dream–/–) mice (6 weeks after transplantation) were challenged with LPS (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and lungs were removed at the indicated times. Lung tissue homogenates were used for immunoblot to determine ICAM-1, A20, DREAM, and β-actin. Representative blots are shown in b. Immunoblots quantified with values normalized to β-actin are shown in c. N = 6 in each group. **P< 0.01; ***p<0.001, difference between Dream+/+ and WT-BM→ Dream–/– group (unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test). d, Cytokines (MCP-1, TNF, and IL-6) in BALF were measured after LPS challenge. N = 6 in each group; *p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, difference between LPS-injected WT and Dream–/–- mice or WT and WT-BM→ Dream–/– mice (unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test). e, Cytokines (MCP-1, TNF, and IL-6) in serum were measured after LPS challenge. N = 6 in each group; *p< 0.05, **p<0.001, n.s. not significant, difference between LPS-injected WT and Dream–/– mice (unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test). f, MPO activity in BALF was measured after LPS challenge. N = 6 in each group; **p< 0.01, ***p<0.001, difference between LPS-injected WT and Dream–/– mice or WT and WT-BM→ Dream–/– mice (unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test). g, Survival of Dream+/+, Dream-/-, WT-BM→ Dream–/– mice after LPS challenge (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Age and weight matched mice were followed for 6 days after LPS administration. n = 8 in each group. **p< 0.01, vs. Dream+/+ mice using the log-rank test.

Supplementary Figure 2 LPS induces the mobilization of DREAM in BMDMs and analysis of the regulation of A20 transcription coordinated by DREAM and USF1.

a, WT-mice BMDMs were challenged with LPS (1 μg/ml) for different time intervals. After this treatment, cytosolic and nuclear fractions were prepared12 and used for immunoblot analysis to determine DREAM, β-actin (cytosolic marker), or MCM3 (nuclear marker). Data are from representative of two experiments. Values normalized to β-actin or MCM3 are shown in right panels. b, In basal condition, DREAM binding to DREs localized on A20 promoter represses A20 transcription. Inflammatory stimuli (e.g., LPS and TNF)-induced activation of protein kinase A (PKA) results in phosphorylation of nuclear CREM (cAMP-response element modulator)2,3. Interaction of phospho-CREM with DREAM uncouples DREAM from DREs resulting in USF1 binding to DRE-E-box motif, which activates A20 transcription. A20 transcription can be restored by the dephosphoryation of phospho-CREM.

Supplementary Figure 3 LPS induces c-Fos expression.

a, Dream+/+ and Dream–/– mice were challenged with LPS (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and lungs were removed at the indicated times as described in Fig. 1a. Lung tissue was used for Western blot analysis of c-Fos protein expression. n = 5 per time point in each group. **p< 0.01 (unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test), different from Dream+/+ mice. b, BMDMs in culture from Dream+/+ and Dream–/– mice exposed to LPS (100 ng/ml) for different time intervals were used for IB to determine expression of c-Fos. Data shown are representative of three or more experiments. Immunoblots were quantified (right panels). *p<0.05, **p<0.01(unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test); different from Dream+/+.

Supplementary Figure 4 DREAM regulates TAK1 and IKK signaling in BMDMs.

BMDMs in culture from Dream+/+ and Dream–/– mice were exposed to LPS (100 ng/ml) for different time intervals and then cell lysates were used for IB to determine activation of TAK1 (a) and IKK (b). Data shown are representative of three or more experiments. Immunoblots were quantified (right panels). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test);different from Dream+/+.

Supplementary Figure 5 DREAM regulates the transcription of NF-κB signaling components differently.

Dream+/+ or Dream–/– mice lung tissue (LT) mRNA levels of NF-κB signaling components (TRAF2, TRAF6, RIP1, RIP2, IKKγ (Ikbkg), NF-κB1, NF-κB2, RelB, and c-Rel) were determined by qPCR. n = 4 mice per group. Values reported are mean ± S.D. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test, significantly different from Dream+/+ mice.

Supplementary Figure 6 Model for DREAM regulation of NF-κB signaling and lung inflammatory injury.

IκB kinase (IKKα/IKKβ/IKKγ) activation downstream of TNFR or TLR4 requires K63-linked polyubiquitylation of TRAFs, RIPs, and IKKγ proteins (polyubiquitylation not indicated in the model)19,20. K63-linked polyubiquitylation of these proteins recruits TAK1 to form functional signaling complex which activates IκB kinase and p38 MAPK19,20. Both IκB kinase and p38 MAPK activation amplifies inflammatory responses by inducing the production of inflammatory cytokines and expression of ICAM-1 in lungs. A20 de-ubiquitylates, K63-linked polyubiquitin chains on TRAFs, RIPs, and IKKγ proteins to inhibit IκB kinase and p38 MAPK. This mechanism prevented lung inflammation and injury. DREAM functions by binding to the A20 gene DRE elements thereby represses A20 transcription, and thereby prevents activation of NF-κB and p38 MAPK to prevent lung inflammatory injury.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–6 (PDF 736 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiruppathi, C., Soni, D., Wang, DM. et al. The transcription factor DREAM represses the deubiquitinase A20 and mediates inflammation. Nat Immunol 15, 239–247 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2823

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2823

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing