Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Atmospheric circulation as a source of uncertainty in climate change projections

Nature Geoscience volume 7, pages 703–708 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The evidence for anthropogenic climate change continues to strengthen, and concerns about severe weather events are increasing. As a result, scientific interest is rapidly shifting from detection and attribution of global climate change to prediction of its impacts at the regional scale. However, nearly everything we have any confidence in when it comes to climate change is related to global patterns of surface temperature, which are primarily controlled by thermodynamics. In contrast, we have much less confidence in atmospheric circulation aspects of climate change, which are primarily controlled by dynamics and exert a strong control on regional climate. Model projections of circulation-related fields, including precipitation, show a wide range of possible outcomes, even on centennial timescales. Sources of uncertainty include low-frequency chaotic variability and the sensitivity to model error of the circulation response to climate forcing. As the circulation response to external forcing appears to project strongly onto existing patterns of variability, knowledge of errors in the dynamics of variability may provide some constraints on model projections. Nevertheless, higher scientific confidence in circulation-related aspects of climate change will be difficult to obtain. For effective decision-making, it is necessary to move to a more explicitly probabilistic, risk-based approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Contrast between the robustness of observed changes in thermodynamic and dynamic aspects of climate.
Figure 2: Contrast between the robustness of projected changes in surface temperature and in precipitation.
Figure 3: Impact of natural internal variability on regional aspects of climate change.
Figure 4: Non-robustness of the predicted circulation response to climate change.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  2. Met Office The Recent Storms and Floods in the UK (Met Office, 2014); http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/1/2/Recent_Storms_Briefing_Final_SLR_20140211.pdf

  3. Bühler, T., Raible, C. C. & Stocker, T. F. The relationship of winter season North Atlantic blocking frequencies to extreme cold or dry spells in the ERA-40. Tellus A 63, 212–222 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Screen, J. A. & Simmonds, I. Amplified mid-latitude planetary waves favour particular regional weather extremes. Nature Clim. Change 4, 704–709 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Turner, A. G. & Annamalai, H. Climate change and the South Asian summer monsoon. Nature Clim. Change 2, 587–595 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lin, M., Horowitz, L. W., Oltmans, S. J., Fiore, A. M. & Fan, S. Tropospheric ozone trends at Mauna Loa Observatory tied to decadal climate variability. Nature Geosci. 7, 136–143 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. IPCC Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).

  8. Knutti, R. & Sedlacek, J. Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nature Clim. Change 3, 369–373 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stott, P. A. et al. External control of 20th century temperature by natural and anthropogenic forcings. Science 290, 2133–2137 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoskins, B. J. in Large-Scale Dynamical Processes in the Atmosphere (eds Hoskins, B. J. & Pearce, R. P.) 169–199 (Academic Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deser, C., Magnusdottir, G., Saravanan, R. & Phillips, A. The effects of North Atlantic SST and sea ice anomalies on the winter circulation in CCM3. Part II: Direct and indirect components of the response. J. Clim. 17, 877–889 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simpson, I. R., Blackburn, M. & Haigh, J. D. The role of eddies in driving the tropospheric response to stratospheric heating perturbations. J. Atmos. Sci. 66, 1347–1365 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Held, I. M. & Hoskins, B. J. Large-scale eddies and the general circulation of the troposphere. Adv. Geophys. 28A, 3–31 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bony, S. et al. Robust direct effect of carbon dioxide on tropical circulation and regional precipitation. Nature Geosci. 6, 447–451 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chadwick, R., Boutle, I. & Martin, G. Spatial patterns of precipitation change in CMIP5: Why the rich do not get richer in the tropics. J. Clim. 27, 3803–3822 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strogatz, S. H. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering (Perseus Books, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Palmer, T. N. A nonlinear dynamical perspective on climate prediction. J. Clim. 12, 575–591 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wunsch, C. The interpretation of short climate records, with comments on the North Atlantic and Southern Oscillations. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 80, 245–255 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shin, S-I. & Sardeshmukh, P. D. Critical influence of the pattern of tropical ocean warming on remote climate trends. Clim. Dynam. 36, 1577–1591 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deser, C., Phillips, A., Bourdette, V. & Teng, H. Y. Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability. Clim. Dynam. 38, 527–546 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deser, C., Phillips, A. S., Alexander, M. A. & Smoliak, B. V. Projecting North American climate over the next 50 years: uncertainty due to internal variability. J. Clim. 27, 2271–2296 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Palmer, T. N. & Räisänen, J. Quantifying the risk of extreme seasonal precipitation events in a changing climate. Nature 415, 512–514 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change. Clim. Dynam. 37, 407–418 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fedorov, A. V. & Philander, S. G. A stability analysis of tropical ocean–atmosphere interactions: bridging measurements and theory for El Niño. J. Clim. 14, 3086–3101 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hall, N. M. J., Derome, J. & Lin, H. The extratropical signal generated by a midlatitude SST anomaly. Part I: Sensitivity at equilibrium. J. Clim. 14, 2035–2053 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sigmond, M. & Scinocca, J. F. The influence of the basic state on the Northern Hemisphere circulation response to climate change. J. Clim. 23, 1434–1446 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scaife, A. A. et al. Climate change projections and stratosphere–troposphere interaction. Clim. Dynam. 38, 2089–2097 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Garfinkel, C. I., Waugh, D. W. & Gerber, E. P. The effect of tropospheric jet latitude on coupling between the stratospheric polar vortex and the troposphere. J. Clim. 26, 2077–2095 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, G., Held, I. M. & Robinson, W. A. Sensitivity of the latitude of the surface westerlies to surface friction. J. Atmos. Sci. 64, 2899–2915 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stevens, B. & Bony, S. What are climate models missing? Science 340, 1053–1054 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sandu, I., Beljaars, A., Bechtold, P., Mauritsen, T. & Balsamo, G. Why is it so difficult to represent stably stratified conditions in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models? J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 5, 117–133 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nyquist, H. Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors. Phys. Rev. 32, 110–113 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen, G. & Plumb, R. A. Quantifying the eddy feedback and the persistence of the zonal index in an idealized atmospheric model. J. Atmos. Sci. 66, 3707–3720 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Son, S-W. & Lee, S. The response of westerly jets to thermal driving in a primitive equation model. J. Atmos. Sci. 62, 3741–3757 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tandon, N. F., Gerber, E. P., Sobel, A. H. & Polvani, L. M. Understanding Hadley cell expansion versus contraction: insights from simplified models and implications for recent observations. J. Clim. 26, 4304–4321 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Branstator, G. & Selten, F. ''Modes of variability'' and climate change. J. Clim. 22, 2639–2658 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gritsun, A. & Branstator, G. Climate response using a three-dimensional operator based on the fluctuation–dissipation theorem. J. Atmos. Sci. 64, 2558–2575 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Keeley, S. P. E., Sutton, R. T. & Shaffrey, L. C. Does the North Atlantic Oscillation show unusual persistence on intraseasonal timescales? Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L22706 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Simpson, I. R., Shepherd, T. G., Hitchcock, P. & Scinocca, J. F. Southern Annular Mode dynamics in observations and models. Part 2: Eddy feedbacks. J. Clim. 26, 5220–5241 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ring, M. J. & Plumb, R. A. The response of a simplified GCM to axisymmetric forcings: applicability of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem. J. Atmos. Sci. 65, 3880–3898 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Corti, S., Molteni, F. & Palmer, T. N. Signature of recent climate change in frequencies of natural atmospheric circulation regimes. Nature 398, 799–802 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  42. van Oldenborgh, G. J., Doblas Reyes, F. J., Drijfhout, S. S. & Hawkins, E. Reliability of regional climate model trends. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 014055 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hitchcock, P., Shepherd, T. G. & Manney, G. L. Statistical characterization of Arctic polar-night jet oscillation events. J. Clim. 26, 2096–2116 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  44. McLandress, C., Shepherd, T. G., Polavarapu, S. & Beagley, S. R. Is missing orographic gravity wave drag near 60°S the cause of the stratospheric zonal wind biases in chemistry–climate models? J. Atmos. Sci. 69, 802–818 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Knutti, R., Masson, D. & Gettelman, A. Climate model genealogy: generation CMIP5 and how we got there. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 1194–1199 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hall, A. & Qu, X. Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow albedo feedback in future climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L03502 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cox, P. M. et al. Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability. Nature 494, 341–344 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Coughlan de Perez, E., Monasso, F., van Aalst, M. & Suarez, P. Science to prevent disasters. Nature Geosci. 7, 78–79 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sandeep, S., Stordal, F., Sardeshmukh, P. D. & Compo, G. Pacific Walker circulation variability in coupled and uncoupled climate models. Clim. Dynam. 43, 103–117 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Meier, W. N., Stroeve, J., Barrett, A. & Fetterer, F. A simple approach to providing a more consistent Arctic sea ice extent time series from the 1950s to present. Cryosphere 6, 1359–1368 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the support provided through the Grantham Chair in Climate Science at the University of Reading. Helpful comments on the manuscript were provided by S. Bony, I. Held, B. Hoskins and M. Hegglin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6BB, UK

    Theodore G. Shepherd

Authors
  1. Theodore G. Shepherd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodore G. Shepherd.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shepherd, T. Atmospheric circulation as a source of uncertainty in climate change projections. Nature Geosci 7, 703–708 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2253

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2253

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing