Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Prolonged Canterbury earthquake sequence linked to widespread weakening of strong crust

Abstract

The Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand was characterized by high-energy earthquakes1, a complex pattern of faulting and an extended series of aftershocks2. The mainshock occurred in September 2010, yet the largest aftershock occurred 172 days later. Beneath the Canterbury region, the Hikurangi Plateau—a large igneous province that was subducted about 100 Myr ago3—remains attached to the crust, welded to greywacke rocks that were fractured during the earthquakes. Here we use three-dimensional seismic tomographic data to investigate the role this crustal structure played in the unusual Canterbury earthquake sequence. We identify a broad, 5-km-wide region centred beneath the surface break and coincident with the depth of maximum fault slip during the mainshock that is characterized by unusually low seismic P- to S-wave velocity ratios of 1.60. Yet before the mainshock this region exhibited ratios4 of 1.71. We interpret the reduced velocity ratios as the signature of greywacke rocks that have been weakened by the fresh rupture front producing widespread cracking around the fault zone. We suggest that recovery of rock strength between the mainshock and largest aftershock could explain the long delay between the two events. In contrast to a common assumption in aftershock forecasts that crustal strength is constant, we conclude that energetic earthquakes can lead to widespread changes in the strength of Earth’s crust.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The Canterbury earthquake sequence.
Figure 2: A depth section of the P-wave velocity model normal to the plate boundary and through Lyttelton volcano.
Figure 3: Maps of Vp/Vs at 3 km depth.
Figure 4: Cumulative number of aftershocks with magnitude ≥3.0 with time (blue line).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fry, B. & Gerstenberger, M. C. Large apparent stresses from the Canterbury earthquakes of 2010 and 2011. Seismol. Res. Lett. 82, 833–838 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beavan, J., Motagh, M., Fielding, E. J., Donnelly, N. & Collett, D. Fault slip models of the 2010–2011 Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquakes from geodetic data and observations of postseismic ground deformation. NZ J. Geol. Geophys. 55, 207–221 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reyners, M., Eberhart-Phillips, D. & Bannister, S. Tracking repeated subduction of the Hikurangi Plateau beneath New Zealand. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 311, 165–171 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eberhart-Phillips, D., Reyners, M., Bannister, S., Chadwick, M. & Ellis, S. Establishing a versatile 3D seismic velocity model for New Zealand. Seismol. Res. Lett. 81, 992–1000 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace, L. M., Beavan, J., McCaffrey, R., Berryman, K. & Denys, P. Balancing the plate motion budget in the South Island, New Zealand using GPS, geological and seismological data. Geophys. J. Int. 168, 332–352 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Quigley, M. et al. Surface rupture during the 2010 Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake: Implications for fault rupture dynamics and seismic-hazard analysis. Geology 40, 55–58 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berryman, K. Geoscience as a component of response and recovery from the Canterbury earthquake sequence of 2010–2011. NZ J. Geol. Geophys. 55, 313–319 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ristau, J. et al. The Pegasus Bay aftershock sequence of the Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) New Zealand earthquake. Geophys. J. Int. 195, 444–459 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davy, B., Hoernle, K. & Werner, R. Hikurangi Plateau: Crustal structure, rifted formation, and Gondwana subduction history. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9, Q07004 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor, B. The single largest oceanic plateau; Ontong Java–Manihiki–Hikurangi. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 241, 372–380 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reyners, M. & Cowan, H. The transition from subduction to continental collision: Crustal structure in the north Canterbury region, New Zealand. Geophys. J. Int. 115, 1124–1136 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Timm, C., Hoernle, K., van den Bogaard, P, Bindeman, I. & Weaver, S. Geochemical evolution of intraplate volcanism at Banks Peninsula, New Zealand: Interaction between asthenospheric and lithospheric melts. J. Petrol. 50, 1–35 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reyners, M. Lessons from the destructive Mw 6.3 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquake. Seismol. Res. Lett. 82, 371–372 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eberhart-Phillips, D. & Reyners, M. Imaging the Hikurangi Plate interface region, with improved local-earthquake tomography. Geophys. J. Int. 190, 1221–1242 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scholz, C. H. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting 146–155 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Scholz, C. H. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting 28–31 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. David, E. C. & Zimmerman, R. W. Pore structure model for elastic wave velocities in fluid-saturated sandstones. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B07210 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. & Dvorkin, J. The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media 363–379 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, Y-G., Vidale, J. E., Aki, K., Xu, F. & Burdette, T. Evidence of shallow fault zone strengthening after the 1992 M7.5 Landers, California, earthquake. Science 279, 217–219 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, Y-G., Vidale, J. E., Day, S. M., Oglesby, D. D. & Cochran, E. Postseismic fault healing on the rupture zone of the 1999 M 7.1 Hector Mine, California, earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 854–869 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin, G. & Thurber, C. H. Seismic velocity variations along the rupture zone of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, California. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B09301 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wald, D. J., Helmberger, D. V. & Heaton, T. H. Rupture model of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake from the inversion of strong-motion and broadband teleseismic data. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 81, 1540–1572 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Choy, G. L., McGarr, A., Kirby, S. H. & Boatwright, J. in Earthquakes: Radiated Energy and the Physics of Faulting (eds Abercrombie, R., McGarr, A., Di Toro, G. & Kanamori, H.) 43–57 (American Geophysical Union, 2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Meng, L. et al. Earthquake in a maze: compressional rupture branching during the 2012 Mw 8.6 Sumatra earthquake. Science 337, 724–726 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reyners, M., Eberhart-Phillips, D., Bannister, S. & Martin, S. The tectonic context of the destructive 2010–2011 Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquake sequence. Eos Trans. AGU (Fall Meeting Suppl.) 92, S21C-06 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stein, S. & Liu, M. Long aftershock sequences within continents and implications for earthquake hazard assessment. Nature 462, 87–89 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Utsu, T. A statistical study of the occurrence of aftershocks. Geophys. Mag. 30, 521–605 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Perfettini, H. & Avouac, J-P. Modelling afterslip and aftershocks following the 1992 Landers earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 112, B07409 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Michelini, A. & McEvilly, T. V. Seismological studies at Parkfield. I. Simultaneous inversion for velocity structure and hypocenters using cubic B-splines parameterization. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 81, 524–552 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  30. DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G. & Argus, D. F. Geologically current plate motions. Geophys. J. Int. 181, 1–80 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was improved by reviews by B. Fry and S. Ellis. GeoNet (www.geonet.org), financially supported by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission, provided the earthquake data used in the study. Research was supported by the Marsden Fund administerd by the Royal Society of New Zealand and by the Natural Hazards Research Platform of the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Employment and Innovation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.R. helped to co-ordinate the deployment of portable seismographs after the earthquakes and led the analysis of the resulting earthquake data. D.E-P. led the tomographic inversions. S.M. assisted with earthquake analysis. M.R. wrote the manuscript, with contributions from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Reyners.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 756 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reyners, M., Eberhart-Phillips, D. & Martin, S. Prolonged Canterbury earthquake sequence linked to widespread weakening of strong crust. Nature Geosci 7, 34–37 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2013

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2013

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing