Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Variations in earthquake rupture properties along the Gofar transform fault, East Pacific Rise

Subjects

Abstract

On a global scale, seismicity on oceanic transform faults that link mid-ocean ridge segments is thermally controlled1,2. However, temperature cannot be the only control because the largest earthquakes on oceanic transform faults rupture only a small fraction of the area that thermal models predict to be capable of rupture3,4,5. Instead, most slip occurs without producing large earthquakes3,4,6. When large earthquakes do occur, they often repeat quasiperiodically7,8. Moreover, oceanic transform faults produce an order of magnitude more foreshocks than continental strike-slip faults7,9. Here we analyse a swarm of about 20,000 foreshocks, recorded on an array of ocean-bottom seismometers, which occurred before a magnitude 6.0 earthquake on the Gofar transform fault, East Pacific Rise. We find that the week-long foreshock sequence was confined to a 10-km-long region that subsequently acted as a barrier to rupture during the mainshock. The foreshock zone is associated with a high porosity and undergoes a 3% decrease in average shear-wave speed during the week preceding the mainshock. We conclude that the material properties of fault segments capable of rupturing in large earthquakes differ from those of barrier regions, possibly as a result of enhanced fluid circulation within the latter. We suggest that along-strike variations in fault zone material properties can help explain the abundance of foreshocks and the relative lack of large earthquakes that occur on mid-ocean ridge transform faults.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Earthquake epicentres at the Gofar transform fault.
Figure 2: Earthquake temporal distribution.
Figure 3: Along-strike variations in earthquake depths.
Figure 4: Temporal velocity changes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boettcher, M. S., Hirth, G. & Evans, B. Olivine friction at the base of oceanic seismogenic zones. J. Geophys. Res. 112, B01205 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abercrombie, R. E. & Ekstrom, G. Earthquake slip on oceanic transform faults. Nature 410, 74–77 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boettcher, M. S. & Jordan, T. H. Earthquake scaling relations for mid-ocean ridge transform faults. J. Geophys. Res. 109, B12302 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bird, P., Kagan, Y. Y. & Jackson, D. D. in Plate Boundary Zones Vol. 30 (eds Stein, S. & Freymueller, J. T.) 203–218 (Geodynamics Series, AGU, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roland, E., Behn, M. D. & Hirth, G. Thermal–mechanical behavior of oceanic transform faults: Implications for the spatial distribution of seismicity. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 11, Q07001 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brune, J. N. Seismic moment seismicity and rate of slip along major fault zones. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 777 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McGuire, J. J. Seismic cycles and earthquake predictability on East Pacific Rise transform faults. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 1067–1084 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boettcher, M. S. & McGuire, J. J. Scaling relations for seismic cycles on mid-ocean ridge transform faults. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L21301 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McGuire, J. J., Boettcher, M. S. & Jordan, T. H. Foreshock sequences and short-term earthquake predictability on East Pacific Rise transform faults. Nature 434, 457–461 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Searle, R. C. Multiple, closely spaced transform faults in fast-slipping fracture-zones. Geology 11, 607–610 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roland, E. & McGuire, J. J. Earthquake swarms on transform faults. Geophys. J. Int. 178, 1677–1690 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaneko, Y., Avouac, J. P. & Lapusta, N. Towards inferring earthquake patterns from geodetic observations of interseismic coupling. Nature Geosci. 3, 363–369 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roland, E. Earthquake Behavior and Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2011).

  14. Silver, P. G., Daley, T. M., Niu, F. & Majer, E. L. Active source monitoring of cross-well seismic travel time for stress-induced changes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, 281–293 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dieterich, J. A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 2601–2618 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rivet, D. et al. Seismic evidence of nonlinear crustal deformation during a large slow slip event in Mexico. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L08308 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lohman, R. B. & McGuire, J. J. Earthquake swarms driven by aseismic creep in the Salton Trough, California. J. Geophys. Res. 112, B04405 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hekinian, R., Bideau, D., Cannat, M., Francheteau, J. & Hebert, R. Volcanic activity and crust mantle exposure in the ultrafast garrett transform-fault near 13-degrees-28S in the Pacific. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 108, 259–275 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Christensen, N. I. Pore pressure and oceanic crustal seismic structure. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 79, 411–423 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kohli, A. H., Goldsby, D. L., Hirth, G. & Tullis, T. Flash weakening of serpentinite at near-seismic slip rates. J. Geophys. Res. 116, B0302 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Korenaga, J., Kelemen, P. B. & Holbrook, W. S. Methods for resolving the origin of large igneous provinces from crustal seismology. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 2178 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, Y. J. & Rice, J. R. Slow slip predictions based on granite and gabbro friction data compared to GPS measurements in northern Cascadia. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B09407 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Samuelson, J., Elsworth, D. & Marone, C. Influence of dilatancy on the frictional constitutive behavior of a saturated fault zone under a variety of drainage conditions. J. Geophys. Res. 116, B10406 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Avendonk, H. J. A., Harding, A. J., Orcutt, J. A. & McClain, J. S. A two-dimensional tomographic study of the Clipperton transform fault. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 17885–17899 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Simons, F. J., Dando, B. D. E. & Allen, R. M. Automatic detection and rapid determination of earthquake magnitude by wavelet multiscale analysis of the primary arrival. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 250, 214–223 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peng, Z. G. & Zhao, P. Migration of early aftershocks following the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. Nature Geosci. 2, 877–881 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Waldhauser, F. & Ellsworth, W. L. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the northern Hayward fault, California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 1353–1368 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schaff, D. P. et al. Optimizing correlation techniques for improved earthquake location. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 705–721 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Poupinet, G., Ellsworth, W. L. & Frechet, J. Monitoring velocity variations in the crust using earthquake doublets—an application to the Calaveras fault, California. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 5719–5731 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sens-Schonfelder, C. & Wegler, U. Passive image interferometry and seasonal variations of seismic velocities at Merapi volcano, Indonesia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L21302 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the W. M. Keck Foundation for the financial support to build the OBSs that carried strong-motion accelerometers and made this study possible. We thank the crews of the RVs Thomas G. Thompson, Marcus Langseth and Atlantis for three nearly flawless cruises needed to collect this data set. We thank the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Ocean Bottom Seismic Instrumentation Pool group, K. Peal, R. Handy, A. Gardner, D. Dubois, D. Kot, P. Lemmond and J. Ryder, for collecting such an amazing data set. This work was done with the support of the National Science Foundation grant OCE-0242117. P.G. is supported by a Shell research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.J.M. and J.A.C. conceived the OBS experiment. J.J.M., J.A.C., M.S.B. and E.R. participated in the three research cruises and associated data collection. J.J.M. and J.A.C. derived the earthquake catalogue. P.G. and R.D.v.d.H. carried out the velocity-change analysis. E.R. and D.L. determined the seismic velocity model used for relocations. E.R. and M.D.B. carried out the thermal modelling. All authors discussed results and contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey J. McGuire.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 8680 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGuire, J., Collins, J., Gouédard, P. et al. Variations in earthquake rupture properties along the Gofar transform fault, East Pacific Rise. Nature Geosci 5, 336–341 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1454

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1454

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing