Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Internal boundary layer model for the evolution of desert dune fields

Abstract

Desert dunes often exhibit remarkable changes in their morphology over short distances. For example, sediment-rich dunes can break up into smaller, isolated features, and then become stabilized by plants, over distances of kilometres1,2,3,4,5,6. These pattern transitions often coincide with spatial variations in sediment supply1,3,5, transport rate6,7, hydrology8 and vegetation9,10,11, but these factors have not been linked mechanistically. Here we hypothesize that the abrupt increase in roughness at the upwind margins of dune fields triggers the development of an internal boundary layer12,13,14,15,16,17,18 that thickens downwind and causes a spatial decrease in the surface wind stress. We demonstrate that this mechanism forces a downwind decline in sand flux at White Sands, New Mexico, using a combination of physical theory14,15,16,17,18,19, repeated airborne altimetry surveys and field observations. The declining sand flux triggers an abrupt increase in vegetation density, which in turn leads to changes in groundwater depth and salinity—showing that aerodynamics, sediment transport and ecohydrology are tightly interconnected in this landscape. We conclude that, despite the documented complex climatic and geologic history of White Sands20, internal boundary layer theory explains many of the observed first-order patterns of the dune field.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: White Sands dune field.
Figure 2: Definition sketch and boundary stress profile.
Figure 3: Sand flux, groundwater and vegetation patterns.
Figure 4: Conceptual model of evaporation rate as a function of groundwater depth.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagnold, R. A. The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes (Methuen, 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  2. McKee, E. D. Structures of dunes at White Sands National Monument, New Mexico (and a comparison with structures of dunes from other selected areas). Sedimentology 7, 3–69 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lancaster, N. Winds and sand movements in the Namib Sand Sea. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 10, 607–619 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kocurek, G. et al. White Sands Dune Field, New Mexico: Age, dune dynamics and recent accumulations. Sedim. Geol. 197, 313–331 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pye, K. & Tsoar, H. Aeolian Sand and Sand Dunes (Springer, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Ewing, R. C. & Kocurek, G. A. Aeolian dune interactions and dune-field pattern formation: White Sands Dune Field, New Mexico. Sedimentology 57, 1199–1219 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Illenberger, W. K. & Ruse, I. C. A sand budget for the Alexandria coastal dunefield, South Africa. Sedimentology 35, 513–521 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Langford, R., Rose, J. & White, D. Groundwater salinity as a control on development of eolian landscape: An example from the White Sands of New Mexico. Geomorphology 105, 39–49 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duran, O. & Herrmann, H. Vegetation against dune mobility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 188001 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baas, A. C. W. & Nield, J. M. Modelling vegetated dune landscapes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L06405 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reitz, M. D., Jerolmack, D. J., Ewing, R. C. & Martin, R. L. Barchan–parabolic dune pattern transition from vegetation stability threshold. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L19402 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hsu, S. A. Boundary-layer meteorological research in the coastal zone. Geosci. Man XVIII, 99–111 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rasmussen, K. R. Some aspects of flow over coastal dunes. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. B 96, 129–147 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bradley, E. F. A micrometeorological study of velocity profiles and surface drag in the region modified by a change in surface roughness. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 361–379 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, K. S., Wyngaard, J. C. & Coté, O. R. The structure of the two-dimensional internal boundary layer over a sudden change of surface roughness. J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 738–746 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wood, D. H. Internal boundary layer growth following a step change in surface roughness. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 22, 241–244 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stevenson, D. C. & Lee, W. L. Proc. 9th Australasian Fluid Mech. Conf. 379–382 (University of Auckland, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garratt, J. R. The internal boundary layer: A review. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 50, 171–203 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jerolmack, D. J., Reitz, M. D. & Martin, R. L. Sorting out abrasion in a gypsum dune field. J. Geophys. Res. 116, F02003 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Langford, R. The Holocene history of the White Sands dune field and influences on eolian deflation and playa lakes. Quat. Int. 104, 31–39 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fryberger, S. Geological overview of White Sands National MonumentPreprint at http://www.nps.gov/archive/whsa/Geology%20of%20White%20Sands/GeoHome.html (2009).

  22. Szynkiewicz, A. et al. Origin of terrestrial gypsum dunes—implications for Martian gypsum-rich dunes of Olympia Undae. Geomorphology 121, 69–83 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Newton, T. 2010 Annual Report to the National Park Service (National Park Service, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Antonia, R. A. & Luxton, R. E. The response of a turbulent boundary layer to a step change in surface roughness. Part 1. Smooth to rough. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 721–761 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Glauert, M. B. The wall jet. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 625–643 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen, J. S. et al. Water resources: Groundwater maintains dune landscape. Nature 432, 459–460 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Runyan, C. & D’Odorico, P. Ecohydrological feedbacks between salt accumulation and vegetation dynamics: Role of vegetation–groundwater interactions. Wat. Resour. Res. 46, W11561 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lehmann, P., Assouline, S. & Or, D. Characteristic lengths affecting evaporative drying of porous media. Phys. Rev. E 77, 056309 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gribovszki, Z., Szilágyi, J. & Kalicz, P. Diurnal fluctuations in shallow groundwater levels and streamflow rates and their interpretation—a review. J. Hydrol. 385, 371–383 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Maxwell, R. M. & Kollet, S. J. Interdependence of groundwater dynamics and land-energy feedbacks under climate change. Nature Geosci. 1, 665–669 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research partially supported by the National Science Foundation through EAR-PF-0846233 to R.C.E., and EAR-0810038 to D.J.J. We thank K. Litwin, A. Bhattachan, A. Boles and B. McNutt for their assistance in collecting these data. We are especially grateful to D. Bustos of the National Park Service (NPS) for facilitating this study. Lidar data supplied by G. Kocurek, funded by a grant from NPS as part of the Chihuahuan Desert Network Inventory and Monitoring Program. Ideas and suggestions by G. Kocurek and D. Mohrig improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to data collection and analysis. D.J.J. designed the study with input from R.C.E., F.F., R.L.M., C.P. and M.D.R. The paper was written by D.J.J. and edited by all authors. I.B. and C.M. led the groundwater component.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas J. Jerolmack.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 42051 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jerolmack, D., Ewing, R., Falcini, F. et al. Internal boundary layer model for the evolution of desert dune fields. Nature Geosci 5, 206–209 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1381

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1381

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing