Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Orogenic-wedge deformation and potential for great earthquakes in the central Andean backarc

Abstract

Subduction of the Nazca plate beneath South America has driven the growth of the Andes Mountains. Subduction has routinely generated earthquakes larger than magnitude 8.0 along the western margin of the mountain belt1, but the potential size of less frequent earthquakes in the eastern, backarc margin is unknown. Continued support of the high Andean Plateau at the centre of the Andes can be explained only if deformation of the backarc margin is ongoing2,3,4. Here we present GPS data that record surface motions in the Subandean ranges that are part of the backarc margin. We find that the velocity of surface movement decreases sharply from west to east across the Subandean ranges. We suggest that a subhorizontal fault underlying the ranges slips freely at depth in the west, but is locked for up to 100 km in shallower sections further east. Analysis of fault scarps formed where the subhorizontal fault intersects the surface indicates that the fault has generated repeated large earthquakes. We suggest that rupture of the entire locked section of the fault could generate an earthquake of magnitude 8.7–8.9. We attribute the large seismic potential to the unusual width of the Subandean ranges, and suggest that deformation of the Subandean ranges, at a rate unmatched by erosion, causes the mountain range to widen.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: GPS velocity fields in a South America-fixed reference frame.
Figure 2: Marginal posterior probability distributions (PPDs) for estimated dislocation parameters and a cross-section at 20° S.
Figure 3: Topographic analysis of the Mandeyapecua Thrust Front and estimated maximum earthquake parameters.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanamori, H. The energy release of great earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 2981–2987 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Isacks, B. L. Uplift of the central Andean plateau and bending of the Bolivian orocline. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 3211–3231 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamb, S. & Davis, P. Cenozoic climate change as a possible cause for the rise of the Andes. Nature 425, 792–797 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oncken, O. et al. in The Andes Frontiers in Earth Sciences (eds Oncken, O. et al.) Ch. 1, 3–27 (Springer, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garzione, C. N. et al. Rise of the Andes. Science 320, 1304–1307 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ehlers, T. A. & Poulsen, C. J. Influence of Andean uplift on climate and paleoaltimetry estimates. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 281, 238–248 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunn, J. F., Hartshorn, K. G. & Hartshorn, P. W. in Petroleum Basins of South America AAPG Memoir Vol. 62 (eds Tankard, A. J., Suarez Soruco, R. & Welsink, H. J.) 523–543 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baby, P., Rochat, P., Mascle, G. & Herail, G. Neogene shortening contribution to crustal thickening in the back arc of the Central Andes. Geology 25, 883–886 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McQuarrie, N. The kinematic history of the Central Andean fold-thrust belt, Bolivia; implications for building a high plateau. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 114, 950–963 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Masek, J. G., Isacks, B. L., Gubbels, T. L. & Fielding, E. J. Erosion and tectonics at the margins of continental plateaus. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 13941–13956 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kendrick, E. et al. The Nazca–South America Euler Vector and its rate of change. J. S. Am. Earth. Sci. 16, 125–131 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Norabuena, E. et al. Space geodetic observations of Nazca–South America convergence across the Central Andes. Science 279, 358–362 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bevis, M. et al. On the strength of interplate coupling and the rate of back arc convergence in the central Andes: An analysis of the interseismic velocity field. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2, 1067 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brooks, B. et al. Crustal motion in the Southern Andes (26°–36°S): Do the Andes behave like a microplate?. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 4, 1085 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Horton, B. K. Erosional control on the geometry and kinematics of thrust belt development in the central Andes. Tectonics 18, 1292–1304 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bilham, R. et al. GPS measurements of present-day convergence across the Nepal Himalaya. Nature 386, 61–64 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Echavarria, L., Hernandez, R., Allmendinger, R. & Reynolds, J. Subandean thrust and fold belt of northwestern Argentina; geometry and timing of the Andean evolution. AAPG Bull. 87, 965–985 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Uba, C., Kley, J., Strecker, M. & Schmitt, A. K. Unsteady evolution of the Bolivian Subandean thrust belt: The role of enhanced erosion and clastic wedge progradation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 281, 134–146 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu, Y. J. et al. Spatio-temporal slip, and stress level on the faults within the Western Foothills of Taiwan: Implications for fault frictional properties. Pure Appl. Geophys. 166, 1853–1884 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar, S. et al. Paleoseismic evidence of great surface rupture earthquakes along the Indian Himalaya. J. Geophys. Res. 111 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scholz, C. J. Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature 391, 37–42 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Currie, C. A. & Hyndman, R. D. The thermal structure of subduction zone back arcs. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B08404 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lavé, J. & Avouac, J. P. Active folding of fluvial terraces across the Siwalik Hills (Himalaya of central Nepal). J. Geophys. Res. 105, 5735–5770 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lavenu, A. et al. Maps and Database of Quaternary Faults in Bolivia and Chile. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-0283 (2000).

  25. Scholz, C. H. A reappraisal of large earthquake scaling. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 215–218 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Das, S. & Aki, K. Fault plane with barriers—versatile earthquake model. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 5658–5670 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dimate, C. et al. Seismic hazard assessment in the Northern Andes (PILOTO Project). Ann. Geofis. 42, 1039–1055 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dahlen, F. A. Critical taper model of fold-and-thrust belts and accretionary wedges. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci 18, 55–99 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Insel, N. et al. Spatial and temporal variability in denudation across the Bolivian Andes from multiple geochronometers. Geomorphology 122, 65–77 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Strecker, M. R. et al. Tectonics and climate of the southern Central Andes. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci 35, 747–787 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant EAR-0948615) and by Repsol S.A. We thank R. Giraudo, D. Demurro, and R. Limachi of Repsol for assistance with field logistics. We gratefully acknowledge the many people who helped with field work, including D. Caccamise, R. Tinta, C. Distante, T. Ericksen, D. Raleigh, G. Cabrera, A. Mollericona, R. Jauregui, R. Cavero, M. Zamora and O. Ozcacha. We thank J-P. Avouac for his careful reading and suggestions that significantly improved this manuscript. GMT software was used to prepare the figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.A.B. designed the study, collected GPS data, processed GPS data, performed all analyses and wrote the paper. M.Bevis contributed to the study design, GPS processing approach and data collection. K.W. and J.R.A. contributed to geomorphic analysis. J.F. contributed to the GPS processing approach. T.Z. contributed to the study design and geological interpretation. E.K. collected GPS data and contributed to the GPS processing approach. E.M. contributed to regional seismological analysis. A.E. contributed to the study design and GPS data collection. M.Blanco, P.E., M.S., and R.J.S. Jr collected GPS data. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin A. Brooks.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1121 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooks, B., Bevis, M., Whipple, K. et al. Orogenic-wedge deformation and potential for great earthquakes in the central Andean backarc. Nature Geosci 4, 380–383 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1143

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1143

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing