Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Free Association (blog)
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
Reprints and permissions
About this site
For librarians
Press release

Please quote Nature Genetics as the source of these items.

The December 1998 issue of Nature Genetics is available online.

 December 1998 Previous | Next

Promiscuity and the purpose of imprinting

Nature Genetics pp 362 - 365 and pp 315 - 316

Genes are usually inherited as two active copies, one from each parent. For a subset of genes, however, only one copy is active; for these genes, the active copy is always inherited from the mother or, in other cases, it is always passed on from the father -- this phenomenon is known as imprinting. Having only one active copy of a gene means that there is no backup if that copy is defective; it is puzzling that nature should appear to have a rebel without a cause. Scientists have observed that some genes controlling growth of the embryo are imprinted in a specific way -- those that promote growth are only active when inherited from the father, and those that suppress growth are inherited from the mother. This lends support to the idea that gene imprinting arises from a 'conflict' between the sexes. The father wants to propagate his own genes and therefore tries to ensure that his offspring are the biggest and fittest (at whatever cost to the mother). The mother, on the other hand, tries to minimize the drain on her resources by limiting the size of embryo to ensure that she will be able to bear future offspring.

The battle between the sexes, however, may not fully explain gene imprinting, as suggested in a new study by Shirley Tilghman, of Princeton University, and colleagues. Imprinting is thought only to occur in promiscuous animals, where individuals mate with different partners -- leading to competition over whose genes are passed on to the next generation. Truly monogamous animals are not expected to have imprinted genes because the sexes are not in 'conflict'; both parents have an equal interest in maintaining the reproductive prospects of the other -- thereby maximizing their respective chances of having additional offspring that carry their genes. Tilghman and coworkers analysed a polygamous and a monogamous species of the rodent Peromyscus and found, unexpectedly, that imprinted genes are not only present in the promiscuous but also in the monogamous species.

Upon mating the polygamous and monogamous Peromyscus species, the scientists observed hybrid offspring with severe growth defects. Offspring were either drastically growth retarded or extremely oversized -- and rarely survived. The expression of imprinted genes in the hybrid offspring was abnormal compared with that of the parent species, suggesting that imprinted genes may prevent related species from inter-breeding and might provide a means by which new species evolve.

In an accompanying News & Views article, Laurence Hurst, of the University of Bath, discusses the findings and concludes that it might be time to start thinking about new explanations for imprinting.


Genomic imprinting is disrupted in interspecific Peromyscus hybrids pp 362 - 365
Paul B. Vrana, Xiao-Juan Guan, Robert S. Ingram & Shirley M. Tilghman
doi:10.1038/3833
Abstract | Full text | PDF


Peromysci, promiscuity and imprinting pp 315 - 316
Laurence D Hurst
doi:10.1038/3776
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Top

Reversing the sexual roles -- for Ahch

Nature Genetics pp 353 - 357 and pp 318 - 319

Being female by 'default' has been a popular theory in developmental biology circles. It started in the 1950s with studies in rabbits demonstrating that the removal of testes from a male embryo resulted in a female rabbit, whereas removal of ovaries from a female embryo did not change its sexual destiny. It was therefore thought that all of us have the potential to develop as females, but it is the overlay of the testis and male-specific factors that send some of us down the masculine route. This 'default' idea was subsequently rebuffed by evidence suggesting that attaining female sex differentiation is an active process, requiring female-specific factors to program ovarian development. A candidate for such a female factor is AHC (also known as DAX1), a gene on the X chromosome. Men normally have only one copy of the AHC gene, whereas women have two copies. A double dose of AHC in men, as a result of accidental duplication of the gene, causes males (genetically defined as carrying an X and a Y chromosome) to develop the sexual characteristics of females.

Larry Jameson, of Northwestern University Medical School, and colleagues have now made the surprising observation that the absence of Ahch (the mouse equivalent) in female mice does not affect ovarian development and fertility. Rather, it is males that suffer without Ahch -- male mice deficient in Ahch have abnormal testes and are sterile. These findings indicate that Ahch determines male, rather than female, sexual development. In an accompanying News & Views article, Keith Parker, of UT Southwestern Medical Center, and Bernard Schimmer, of the University of Toronto, discuss the role reversal of Ahch in sexual development. In light of this recent report, it might be tempting to revisit the old theory that female development occurs by default, but it may simply be that the feminine mystique is refractory to genetic dissection.


Role of Ahch in gonadal development and gametogenesis pp 353 - 357
Richard N. Yu, Masafumi Ito, Thomas L. Saunders, Sally A. Camper & J. Larry Jameson
doi:10.1038/3822
Abstract | Full text | PDF


Ahch and the feminine mystique pp 318 - 319
Keith L Parker & Bernard P Schimmer
doi:10.1038/3780
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Top

SURFing the respiratory chain

Nature Genetics pp 337 - 343 and pp 316 - 317

Respiration is a process that produces the energy needed to keep a cell alive. It occurs in tiny capsules inside the cell called mitochondria. The respiratory process takes place through the activity of a series of enzymes located along the inner membrane of mitochondria. Disruption of this respiratory chain, as is the case in several human neurodegenerative diseases, compromises energy production throughout the body and causes the greatest damage in those tissues with the highest energy demand -- in particular, the brain. Leigh Syndrome (LS), a severe neurological disorder characterized by necrotic lesions in the brain, is associated with a defect in cytochrome c oxidase (COX), a critical and final 'link' in the respiratory chain. COX is made up of several subunits, each of which is encoded by a different gene -- surprisingly, none of these genes are mutated in LS patients. Eric Shoubridge, of McGill University, and colleagues now reveal that mutation of the SURF1 gene is the underlying genetic defect in LS. The function of SURF1 is presently unknown, but, as discussed by Robert Poyton, of the University of Colorado, in an accompanying News & Views article, studies of the equivalent gene in yeast indicate that SURF1 may function as a 'facilitator' for the proper assembly of the different COX subunits.


SURF1, encoding a factor involved in the biogenesis of cytochrome c oxidase, is mutated in Leigh syndrome pp 337 - 343
Zhiqing Zhu, Jianbo Yao, Timothy Johns, Katherine Fu, Isabelle De Bie, Carol Macmillan, Andrew P. Cuthbert, Robert F. Newbold, Jia-chi Wang, Mario Chevrette, Garry K. Brown, Ruth M. Brown & Eric A. Shoubridge
Published online: Abstract | Full text | PDF


Assembling a time bomb—cytochrome c oxidase and disease pp 316 - 317
Robert O Poyton
doi:10.1038/3778
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Top


Rpe65, a visionary protein

Nature Genetics pp 344 - 350

Our ability to see depends on the photoreceptors of the retina, which translate light input into the eye into neural signals. The two types of photoreceptors, rods and cones, serve different visual purposes: rods enable us to see in dim light, whereas cones are best suited to daylight vision. The first and most critical step in vision is the simple change in 'shape' of a molecule inside the photoreceptor called 11-cis-retinal. Normally, 11-cis-retinal is 'bent', but when light hits it, it is converted to a 'straight' form known as all-trans-retinal; this conversion triggers a cascade of downstream events that eventually results in impulses to the brain. In the dark, all-trans-retinal is converted back to 11-cis-retinal to await the next round of light activation. Michael Redmond, of the National Institutes of Health, and colleagues now reveal that the regeneration of 11-cis-retinal depends on the protein Rpe65. The researchers generated mice deficient in Rpe65 and found that the severely disrupted vision in these mice is caused by a block in the recycling of the all-trans form back to 11-cis-retinal. Surprisingly, Redmond and colleagues also observed that, while the function of the rod photoreceptors is disrupted in the Rpe65-deficient mice, cone photoreceptors are unaffected. These observations reveal, for the first time, differences in the way in which rods and cones of mammals regenerate, and provide insight into the underlying pathology that causes early-onset retinal dystrophy of patients with RPE65 mutations.


Rpe65 is necessary for production of 11-cis-vitamin A in the retinal visual cycle pp 344 - 350
T. Michael Redmond, Shirley Yu, Eric Lee, Dean Bok, Duco Hamasaki, Ning Chen, Patrice Goletz, Jian-Xing Ma, Rosalie K. Crouch & Karl Pfeifer
doi:10.1038/3813
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Top

Connecting disease genes to connexin

Nature Genetics pp 366 - 369, pp 370 - 373 and pp 319 - 320

Neighbouring cells communicate with each other by exchanging materials through channels known as gap junctions. Each gap junction is made up of six smaller units, called connexins, which assemble as a complex at the surface of the cell and dock with their counterparts on neighbouring cells to form a channel linking the two cells. There are many different kinds of connexins that assemble into different combinations to make distinct types of gap junctions. The genes encoding connexins are expressed in various parts of the body, and many are found to be expressed in the skin.

Two reports now reveal that mutation of the same connexin gene can cause very different human diseases. Jia-hui Xia, of the National Lab of Medical Genetics of China, and colleagues have discovered mutations in the GJB3 gene in patients with an inherited form of hearing loss. Sherri Bale, of the National Institutes of Health, and colleagues report that defects in the same gene cause erythrokeratodermia variabilis, a condition where the patients have transient red patches on the skin and skin overgrowth (hyperkeratosis). These findings underscore the importance of cellular communication, and how the components that mediate it may be shared between various cell types. In an accompanying News & Views article, Karen Steel, of the University of Nottingham, discusses how mutations in distinct parts of GJB3 might affect different functions of the protein and lead to dramatically different diseases.


Mutations in the human connexin gene GJB3 cause erythrokeratodermia variabilis pp 366 - 369
Gabriele Richard, Lisa E. Smith, Regina A. Bailey, Peter Itin, Daniel Hohl, Ervin H. Epstein Jr, John J. DiGiovanna, , John G. Compton & Sherri J. Bale
doi:10.1038/3840
Abstract | Full text | PDF


Mutations in the gene encoding gap junction proteinß -3 associated with autosomal dominant hearing impairment pp 370 - 373
Jia-hui Xia, Chun-yu Liu, Bei-sha Tang, Qian Pan, Lei Huang, He-ping Dai, Bao-rong Zhang, Wei Xie, Dong-xu Hu, Duo Zheng, Xiao-liu Shi, De-an Wang, Kun Xia, Kuan-ping Yu, Xiao-dong Liao, Yong Feng, Yi-feng Yang, Jian-yun Xiao, Ding-hua Xie & Jian-zheng Huang
doi:10.1038/3845
Abstract | Full text | PDF


One connexin, two diseases pp 319 - 320
Karen P Steel
doi:10.1038/3781
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Top
Register-TOCRegister for table of contents e-alerts
RecommendRecommend to your library
ReceiveReceive news feeds
what is a news feed?

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Genetics
ISSN: 1061-4036
EISSN: 1546-1718
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works ©1998 - 2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy