Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Copy number alterations unmasked as enhancer hijackers

Our understanding of how DNA copy number changes contribute to disease, including cancer, has to a large degree been focused on the changes in gene dosage that they generate and has neglected the effects of the DNA rearrangements that lead to their formation. A new study reports an innovative analytical framework for copy number alterations that are oncogenic primarily owing to the genomic rearrangements that underlie them.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Oncogenic rearrangement topologies that rely on changes in relative placement of genes near regulatory elements rather than simple changes in gene dosage.

References

  1. Zack, T.I. et al. Nat. Genet. 45, 1134–1140 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weischenfeldt, J. et al. Nat. Genet. 49, 65–74 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong, A.J. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 2965–2969 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ong, C.-T. & Corces, V.G. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 283–293 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hnisz, D., Day, D.S. & Young, R.A. Cell 167, 1188–1200 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Northcott, P.A. et al. Nature 511, 428–434 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Battey, J. et al. Cell 34, 779–787 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bandopadhayay, P. et al. Nat. Genet. 48, 273–282 (2016).

  9. Tomlins, S.A. et al. Science 310, 644–648 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gröschel, S. et al. Cell 157, 369–381 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, X. et al. Nat. Genet. 48, 176–182 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hnisz, D. et al. Science 351, 1454–1458 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Nature 487, 330–337 (2012).

  14. Stephens, P.J. et al. Cell 144, 27–40 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baca, S.C. et al. Cell 153, 666–677 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Meyerson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.B. receives research support from and is a consultant for Novartis. M.M. receives research support from Bayer and is a founding advisor of Foundation Medicine, for which he was previously a consultant and in which he previously held equity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beroukhim, R., Zhang, X. & Meyerson, M. Copy number alterations unmasked as enhancer hijackers. Nat Genet 49, 5–6 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3754

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3754

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer