Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Loci at chromosomes 13, 19 and 20 influence age at natural menopause

Nature Genetics volume 41, pages 645–647 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

We conducted a genome-wide association study for age at natural menopause in 2,979 European women and identified six SNPs in three loci associated with age at natural menopause: chromosome 19q13.4 (rs1172822; –0.4 year per T allele (39%); P = 6.3 × 10−11), chromosome 20p12.3 (rs236114; +0.5 year per A allele (21%); P = 9.7 × 10−11) and chromosome 13q34 (rs7333181; +0.5 year per A allele (12%); P = 2.5 × 10−8). These common genetic variants regulate timing of ovarian aging, an important risk factor for breast cancer, osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Meta-analysis of risk for early menopause (<50 years) by genotype for the six genome-wide-significant hits.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burger, H.G. Baillieres Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 10, 347–359 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. te Velde, E.R. et al. Maturitas 30, 119–125 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Murabito, J.M. et al. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 90, 3427–3430 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Snieder, H. et al. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83, 1875–1880 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Asselt, K.M. et al. Fertil. Steril 82, 1348–1351 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weel, A.E. et al. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84, 3146–3150 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kok, H.S. et al. Hum. Reprod. 20, 536–542 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCarthy, M.I. et al. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 356–369 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hofman, A. et al. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 22, 819–829 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Purcell, S. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the European Commision (HEALTH-F2-2008-201865, GEFOS; HEALTH-F2-2008-35627, TREAT-OA), Netherlands Organisation of Scientific Research NWO Investments (nr. 175.010.2005.011, 911-03-012), Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (014-93-015; RIDE2) and the Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI)/Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) project nr. 050-060-810. We thank P. Arp, M. Jhamai, M. Moorhouse, M. Verkerk and S. Bervoets for their help in creating the GWAS-database. The Rotterdam Study is funded by Erasmus Medical Center and Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands Organization for the Health Research and Development (ZonMw), the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE), the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, the Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sports, the European Commission (DG XII) and the Municipality of Rotterdam. TwinsUK is supported by the Wellcome Trust from the Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King's College London and King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The LASA study is largely funded by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports of The Netherlands. The PROSPECT-Frailty study was funded by The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZON) no. 2100.0011.

We thank K. Lunetta for helpful discussion. The authors are very grateful to the study participants and staff from the Rotterdam Study and the TwinsUK, EPOS, PROSPECT-Frailty and LASA studies.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lisette Stolk, Guangju Zhai, Tim D Spector and André G Uitterlinden: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Lisette Stolk, Joyce B J van Meurs, Michael M P J Verbiest, Jenny A Visser, Karol Estrada, Fernando Rivadeneira, Corinne E I Lebrun, Huibert A P Pols & André G Uitterlinden

  2. Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Lisette Stolk, Fernando Rivadeneira, Jacqueline Witteman, Albert Hofman & André G Uitterlinden

  3. The Netherlands Genomics Initiative–sponsored Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Aging (NGI-NCHA), Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Lisette Stolk, Joyce B J van Meurs, Jacqueline Witteman, Albert Hofman & André G Uitterlinden

  4. Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK

    Guangju Zhai, Frances M Williams, Lynn Cherkas & Tim D Spector

  5. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK

    Panos Deloukas & Nicole Soranzo

  6. Research Unit, Diagnostic Center Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Jules J de Keyzer

  7. Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Tilburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Victor J M Pop

  8. Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrine Section, and EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Paul Lips

  9. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Corinne E I Lebrun, Yvonne T van der Schouw & Diederick E Grobbee

  10. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Joop S E Laven

Authors
  1. Lisette Stolk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guangju Zhai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joyce B J van Meurs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael M P J Verbiest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jenny A Visser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Karol Estrada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fernando Rivadeneira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Frances M Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lynn Cherkas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Panos Deloukas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Nicole Soranzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jules J de Keyzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Victor J M Pop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Paul Lips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Corinne E I Lebrun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Yvonne T van der Schouw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Diederick E Grobbee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Jacqueline Witteman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Albert Hofman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Huibert A P Pols
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Joop S E Laven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Tim D Spector
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. André G Uitterlinden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.S., G.Z., T.D.S. and A.G.U. designed the study. L.S. and M.M.P.J.V. did the genotyping of the replication studies. P.D. and N.S. did the genotyping for the TwinsUK study. N.S. did the quality control for the TwinsUK data. L.S., G.Z., J.B.J.v.M. and K.E. did the statistical analyses. L.S., G.Z., J.B.J.v.M., J.A.V., F.R., J.S.E.L., T.D.S. and A.G.U. helped with the interpretation of the results. L.S., G.Z., J.B.J.v.M., J.A.V., F.R., T.D.S. and A.G.U. prepared the manuscript and the revision of the manuscript. F.M.W., A.H. and H.A.P.P. critically revised the manuscript. A.H., J.W., H.A.P.P. and A.G.U. were involved in the sample and phenotype collection of the Rotterdam Study. F.M.W. and L.C. were involved in the phenotype collection of the TwinsUK Study. J.J.d.K., V.J.M.P., P.L., C.E.I.L., Y.T.v.d.S. and D.E.G. were involved in the sample and data collection of the replication studies.

Note: Supplementary information is available on the Nature Genetics website.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André G Uitterlinden.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

L.S., G.Z., T.D.S. and A.G.U. are involved in a patent application based on the results of the work in this manuscript.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Note, Supplementary Tables 1–4, Supplementary Figures 1 and 2 and Supplementary Methods (PDF 550 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stolk, L., Zhai, G., van Meurs, J. et al. Loci at chromosomes 13, 19 and 20 influence age at natural menopause. Nat Genet 41, 645–647 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.387

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.387

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing