Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Free Association (blog)
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
Reprints and permissions
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Nature Methods
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
news@nature.com
Nature Conferences
RNAi Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Letter
Nature Genetics - 38, 1043 - 1048 (2006)
Published online: 20 August 2006; | doi:10.1038/ng1861

A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers

Scott L Carter1, Aron C Eklund1, 2, Isaac S Kohane1, Lyndsay N Harris3 & Zoltan Szallasi1, 4

1  Children's Hospital Informatics Program at the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (CHIP@HST), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

2  Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.

3  Breast Disease Unit, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8032, USA.

4  Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark.

Correspondence should be addressed to Zoltan Szallasi zszallasi@chip.org

We developed a computational method to characterize aneuploidy in tumor samples based on coordinated aberrations in expression of genes localized to each chromosomal region. We summarized the total level of chromosomal aberration in a given tumor in a univariate measure termed total functional aneuploidy. We identified a signature of chromosomal instability from specific genes whose expression was consistently correlated with total functional aneuploidy in several cancer types. Net overexpression of this signature was predictive of poor clinical outcome in 12 cancer data sets1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 representing six cancer types. Also, the signature of chromosomal instability was higher in metastasis samples than in primary tumors and was able to stratify grade 1 and grade 2 breast tumors according to clinical outcome. These results provide a means to assess the potential role of chromosomal instability in determining malignant potential over a broad range of tumors.


 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
CrossRef lists 39 articles citing this articleCrossRef lists 39 articles citing this article
Save this linkSave this link
Competing financial interests
Figures & Tables
Supplementary info
See also: News and Views by Pollack
Export citation

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
Nature Genetics
ISSN: 1061-4036
EISSN: 1546-1718
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy