Nature Genetics
- 38, 1173 - 1177 (2006)
Published online: 24 September 2006; Corrected online: 14 March 2007 | doi:10.1038/ng1890
There is a Corrigendum (April 2007) associated with this Letter.
A common CFH haplotype, with deletion of CFHR1 and CFHR3, is associated with lower risk of age-related macular degenerationAnne E Hughes1, Nick Orr1, Hossein Esfandiary1, Martha Diaz-Torres2, Timothy Goodship2 & Usha Chakravarthy31
Department of Medical Genetics, Queen's University, Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BL, UK. 2
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK. 3
Centre for Vision Science and Vascular Biology, Queen's University, Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BL, UK.
Correspondence should be addressed to Anne E Hughes A.Hughes@qub.ac.uk Age-related macular degeneration (AMD; OMIM #603075) is the most frequent cause of visual impairment in the elderly population, with severe disease affecting nearly 10% of individuals of European descent over the age of 75 years. It is a complex disease in which genetic and environmental factors contribute to susceptibility. Complement factor H (CFH) has recently been identified as a major AMD susceptibility gene, and the Y402H polymorphism has been proposed as the likely causative factor. We genotyped polymorphisms spanning the cluster of CFH and five CFH-related genes on chromosome 1q23 in 173 individuals with severe neovascular AMD and 170 elderly controls with no signs of AMD. Detailed analysis showed a common haplotype associated with decreased risk of AMD that was present on 20% of chromosomes of controls and 8% of chromosomes of individuals with AMD. We found that this haplotype carried a deletion of CFHR1 and CFHR3, and the proteins encoded by these genes were absent in serum of homozygotes. The protective effect of the deletion haplotype cannot be attributed to linkage disequilibrium with Y402H and was replicated in an independent sample.NOTE: In the version of this article initially published, the G and A alleles of rs1831281 in Figure 1 should be reversed, and the block 2 haplotypes in Figure 1, Table 2 and Supplementary Table 2 should be corrected to 1:AGGCGACG, 2:AGGCGAAG, 3:GTGCGGAG, 4:GTATGAAA and 5:GTGTAAAG. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
|
