Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Free Association (blog)
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
Reprints and permissions
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Nature Methods
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
news@nature.com
Nature Conferences
RNAi Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Article
Nature Genetics - 38, 1151 - 1158 (2006)
Published online: 3 September 2006; Corrected online: 20 September 2006 | doi:10.1038/ng1875

Biological function of unannotated transcription during the early development of Drosophila melanogaster

J Robert Manak1, 3, Sujit Dike1, 3, Victor Sementchenko1, Philipp Kapranov1, Frederic Biemar2, Jeff Long1, Jill Cheng1, Ian Bell1, Srinka Ghosh1, Antonio Piccolboni1 & Thomas R Gingeras1

1  Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, California, 95051, USA.

2  Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Center for Integrative Genomics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3200, USA.

3  These authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence should be addressed to J Robert Manak John_Manak@affymetrix.com

Many animal and plant genomes are transcribed much more extensively than current annotations predict. However, the biological function of these unannotated transcribed regions is largely unknown. Approximately 7% and 23% of the detected transcribed nucleotides during D. melanogaster embryogenesis map to unannotated intergenic and intronic regions, respectively. Based on computational analysis of coordinated transcription, we conservatively estimate that 29% of all unannotated transcribed sequences function as missed or alternative exons of well-characterized protein-coding genes. We estimate that 15.6% of intergenic transcribed regions function as missed or alternative transcription start sites (TSS) used by 11.4% of the expressed protein-coding genes. Identification of P element mutations within or near newly identified 5' exons provides a strategy for mapping previously uncharacterized mutations to their respective genes. Collectively, these data indicate that at least 85% of the fly genome is transcribed and processed into mature transcripts representing at least 30% of the fly genome.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Tiling DNA microarrays for fly genome cartography

Nature Genetics News and Views (01 Oct 2006)

The multitasking genome

Nature Genetics News and Views (01 Jun 2006)

See all 7 matches for News And Views
 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
CrossRef lists 29 articles citing this articleCrossRef lists 29 articles citing this article
Save this linkSave this link
Competing financial interests
Figures & Tables
Supplementary info
See also: News and Views by Oliver
Export citation

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
Nature Genetics
ISSN: 1061-4036
EISSN: 1546-1718
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy