Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Free Association (blog)
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
Reprints and permissions
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Nature Methods
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
news@nature.com
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Letter
Nature Genetics  37, 90 - 95 (2004)
Published online: 19 December 2004; | doi:10.1038/ng1492

An Icelandic example of the impact of population structure on association studies

Agnar Helgason1, Bryndís Yngvadóttir1, 2, Birgir Hrafnkelsson1, 2, Jeffrey Gulcher1 & Kári Stefánsson1

1  deCODE Genetics, Sturlugata 8, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland.

2  University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland.

Correspondence should be addressed to Agnar Helgason agnar@decode.is
The impact of population structure on association studies undertaken to identify genetic variants underlying common human diseases is an issue of growing interest1, 2, 3, 4. Spurious associations of alleles with disease phenotypes may be obtained or true associations overlooked when allele frequencies differ notably among subpopulations that are not represented equally among cases and controls. Population structure influences even carefully designed studies and can affect the validity of association results1, 2. Most study designs address this problem by sampling cases and controls from groups that share the same nationality or self-reported ethnic background, with the implicit assumption that no substructure exists within such groups. We examined population structure in the Icelandic gene pool using extensive genealogical and genetic data. Our results indicate that sampling strategies need to take account of substructure even in a relatively homogenous5 genetic isolate6. This will probably be even more important in larger populations.


 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend

naturejobs

Competing financial interests
Figures & Tables
Supplementary info
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Genetics
ISSN: 1061-4036
EISSN: 1546-1718
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2005 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy