Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Free Association (blog)
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
Reprints and permissions
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Nature Methods
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
news@nature.com
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
News and Views
Nature Genetics  22, 3 - 4 (1999)
doi:10.1038/8703

Rattus norvegicus and the Industrial Revolution

Joseph H Nadeau

Department of Genetics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
jhn4@po.cwru.edu

At the forefront of the Genomics Revolution are seven model organisms: viruses, bacteria, fungi, Arabidopsis thaliana, Caenorhabditis elegans , Drosophila melanogaster and the laboratory mouse. Recent advances, now crowned by a study presented by Takeshi Watanabe, Michael James and colleagues on page 27 of this issue, suggest that the rat should now be admitted to this Genome 7 (G7) community.

With respect to incentives, characteristics and goals, the Genomics Revolution shares striking and instructive parallels with the Industrial Revolution. Beginning in England and then spreading to many other countries, the Industrial Revolution inevitably and irreversibly changed societies. Cottage and agricultural communities were converted to urban industrial societies. Factories that manufactured commodities for global markets largely replaced simple machines and handwork that generated goods in homes and shops for local sales. International financiers emerged to provide capital to build factories, purchase raw materials, pay labour and distribute goods. Transportation by water, rail and road moved raw materials and manufactured goods. Laws were periodically passed and repealed to limit production and protect industries. The Revolution was not based on science, invention or capital individually, but rather on the combination of these forces. Luddites opposed these technological and cultural changes, but failed to stop the Industrial Revolution.

Genomics is revolutionizing biomedical research in similar ways. Where genetics research was once a cottage enterprise initiated and managed by individual scientists, genome centres, like factories, have brought together resources, technologies, information and a highly skilled workforce in an integrated, high-throughput manner. Where genes were once individually mapped, cloned and sequenced, and then described in separate research papers, sequence data are now deposited wholesale into public databases. Where protein expression patterns and functions were once studied individually, gene expression patterns and protein functions are now being surveyed and reported on a genomic scale. Funding agencies work closely with genome centres to accomplish shared goals. Electronic networks transmit the main commodity of genomics research—information. Intellectual property considerations and material transfer agreements are commonplace. Finally, opponents view the Genomics Revolution as a threat to traditional research.

To join the revolution, model species must develop their own reagent and information resources. Although the genomic resources of the rat have been steadily accumulating2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, the data provided by Watanabe et al. represent a significant landmark, with the most comprehensive physical (radiation hybrid) map and comparative map of the rat genome yet reported. The authors report 3,019 new microsatellite (CAn dinucleotide repeats) markers that can be typed with PCR assays and used to build genetic and physical maps and sequences that will serve as navigation beacons in genomic sequencing.

The centrepiece of their study is a radiation hybrid (RH) map, a map derived from data obtained from irradiated cells containing fragments of rat chromosomes. Each cell line contains a unique combination of these fragments. By typing the genetic markers in a panel of these cell lines, the relative location of markers can be determined by noting the correlated occurrence of markers—which reflects their close physical proximity on the same DNA fragment. The advantage of the RH approach is the level of resolution; RH maps stand at the interface between the genetic map and the more detailed physical maps under development.

Watanabe et al. also make a significant contribution to comparative maps. These indicate the location of homologous genes in different species and provide a powerful means of transferring genomic information and reagents from map-rich to map-poor species. They also shed light on genome organization and evolution. By comparing the chromosomal location of homologous genes, chromosome segments that have remained intact during evolution can be identified and the location of chromosome rearrangement breakpoints documented. Key to navigating these maps is the ability to cross-reference between a substantial number of homologous genes that are widely distributed across the genome. Nearly 500 of the markers in the current map are within genes whose homologues have been identified in other species. These genes reveal 145 (plusminus20) conserved segments in the rat-human comparative map, and 48 (plusminus7) conserved segments in the rat-mouse comparative map. Cumulatively, these conserved segments cover more than one-half of the rat-human comparative map and more than 80% of the rat-mouse map—which demonstrates that a modest number of genes are sufficient to identify most conserved segments and that the rat comparative map is rapidly approaching completion.

Perhaps the most important, and unappreciated, outcome of both the Industrial and Genomics Revolutions is the enhanced, rather than diminished, vitality of small companies and research laboratories. Despite the profound changes consequent to industrialization, small companies remain an important part of vigorous economies. In the same way, conventional research laboratories are essential for exploiting genomic information, reagents and technologies for functional studies. Genomic information is a catalogue whose meaning can only be established through traditional research based on testing specific hypotheses; it is easier to centralize raw materials in a few centres than to concentrate intuition, imagination and insight. A balance between genome centres and small laboratories is a strength of the research community. The principal threat to success is that small labs are denied access to the products of the Genomics Revolution. Without access, biomedical research may well devolve into feudal societies composed of 'haves' and 'have-nots'. In this context, it is noteworthy that the data obtained by Watanabe et al. have been made freely available in publicly accessible databases.

For years, the rat has been the premier species for many physiological, behavioural and pharmacological studies. With these maps and mapping reagents, the rat community is now well positioned to identify genes that control physiological traits and diseases. And with these maps and reagents, it is time to consider sequencing the rat genome. The nature of the corresponding cultural changes remains to be determined. These benefits and risks now face the rat community as they bid to join the G7.

 Top
REFERENCES
  1. Watanabe, T.K. et al. Nature Genet. 22, 27-36 (1999). | ChemPort |
  2. Jacob, H.J. et al. Nature Genet. 9, 63-69 (1995). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Bihoreau, M.-T. et al. Genome Res. 7, 434-440 (1997). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  4. Brown, D.M. et al. Mamm. Genome 9, 521-530 (1998). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Serikawa, T. et al. Exp. Anim. 47, 1-9 (1998). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Cai, L. et al. Genomics 39, 385-392 (1997). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  7. Woon, P.Y. et al. Genomics 50, 306-316 (1998). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
 Top
FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

naturejobs

References
See also: Article by Watanabe et al.
Export citation
Export references
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Genetics
ISSN: 1061-4036
EISSN: 1546-1718
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©1999 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy