Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Free Association (blog)
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
Reprints and permissions
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Nature Methods
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
news@nature.com
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
News and Views
Nature Genetics  21, 347 - 349 (1999)
doi:10.1038/7668

Making sense out of sound

Andrew J Griffith & Thomas B Friedman

Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, 5 Research Court, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA. friedman@nidcd.nih.gov

Sound is a well-understood, physical phenomenon. How we perceive sound and make sense of complex auditory stimuli is a different matter altogether. Genetic approaches, however, have provided a powerful strategy to dissect auditory function and to some extent, overcome the challenge posed by the inaccessibility and scant quantities of cochlear neurosensory tissue lying deep within the temporal bone. Although remarkable progress has been made in identifying genes causing hearing loss, correlating the functions of those genes with specific auditory processes or pathways is not always straightforward. On page 363 of this issue, Shin'ichiro Yasunaga and colleagues report the latest 'deafness' gene1. While its function has yet to be determined, its sequence and expression in the inner hair cells of the cochlea provide some intriguing clues.

The cochlear neuroepithelium includes inner hair cells ( Fig. 1). These transduce sound into electrical impulses that are transmitted to the central nervous system. While transducing sound, the cochlea faithfully preserves the frequency information of the stimulus. It accomplishes this, in part, by a tonotopic organization of the neurosensory tissue that lies along its length: one end of the cochlea is stimulated by high-frequency sounds and the other is stimulated by low frequencies. This physical distribution of 'sensitivity' to frequencies is similar to that of a piano except that, instead of less than 100 keys, there are more than 3,000 notes that the cochlea can perceive. This organization does not fully account, however, for the high degree of resolution of frequency information that the human perceives.

Figure 1. Diagram of the human ear, including cross sections of the cochlea showing three outer hair cells and one inner hair cell in the organ of Corti.
Figure 1 thumbnail

The basilar membrane vibrates in response to sound waves, which results in deflection of the hair cell stereocilia bundle by the tectorial membrane. Sound transduction occurs via the inner hair cells, which form synaptic connections with afferent nerve fibres of the cochlear ganglion. Displacement of outer hair cell stereocilia results in rapid, reversible shortening of the cell that amplifies the motion of the basilar membrane2, 3. Figure adapted from those appearing in refs 4 and 5.



Full FigureFull Figure and legend (9K)
There are success stories in which deafness genes have been linked to cochlear function, physiology and development. Recently, a 'deafness' gene that resides at the nonsyndromic dominant deafness locus DFNA2 was identified as one that encodes a novel potassium channel (KCNQ4; 6) and is expressed in the outer hair cells of the cochlea. The connexin genes GJB2 and GJB3 and the potassium channel subunit genes KCNQ1 and KCNE1 probably have important roles in potassium homeostasis in the auditory system; mutations in these genes can cause sensorineural hearing loss. Furthermore, mutations of KCNE1 (JLNS2) and KCNQ1 (JLNS1) can cause cardiac conduction abnormalities in addition to hearing loss7.

Striking a nerve
The gene discovered by Yasunaga et al., OTOF, encodes a protein termed otoferlin; its mutation causes recessive deafness phenotype DFNB9 in four Lebanese families. Otoferlin contains three C2-like domains; in other systems, C2 domains interact with phospholipids and proteins. In the postnatal cochlea, otoferlin is predominantly located in sensory inner hair cells, which contain special synapses called ribbon synapses. Otoferlin is similar to other C2 domain-containing proteins, including the fer-1 protein of Caenorhabditis elegans; the spermatids of C. elegans fer-1 mutants show impaired fusion of large vesicles within their plasma membranes. Yasunaga et al. therefore propose that otoferlin is involved in synaptic vesicle trafficking.

The relatively specific expression of mouse Otof in the inner hair cells begs the question of how it is involved in functions specific to the auditory sensory system. It is possible that otoferlin mediates synaptic transmission within the cochlea, and hence, the auditory system's ability to tune itself. If this hypothesis is correct, otoferlin should indeed be located in the synaptic regions of hair cells.

The central nervous system performs the unique tasks of recognizing and processing complex auditory stimuli such as speech, and localizing sounds in the environment8. It should not be ignored in the genetic dissection of deafness, nor when speculating on otoferlin function; neither OTOF expression nor frequency tuning are limited to the cochlea. Otof expression in mouse brain was detected by RT-PCR analysis, although it is impossible to infer the specificity and levels of expression from such an analysis. Elucidating the location of Otof within the central nervous system is clearly in order, with a specific view to determining its expression in the the anatomic pathways of the central auditory system. Hopefully additional mutations in OTOF will be identified—if so, careful analyses of the phenotypes may shed light on its role in the central nervous system.

Clues from the clinic
There have been few thorough auditory phenotypic characterizations of families segregating identified deafness mutations. Many of these families are from geographically isolated areas and are not amenable to thorough clinical evaluations. Accordingly, there is little by way of specific data on the neurologic or audiologic phenotypes of the individuals described by Yasunaga and colleagues. Thorough clinical and electrophysiologic examinations may reveal neurologic abnormalities that were initially undetected, and help to elucidate the function of otoferlin. Peripheral auditory defects may be differentiated from central defects by audiologic methods including routine speech audiometry or auditory brainstem response testing. Although these methods are not useful in cases of total deafness, they might delineate the affected region(s) of the auditory system in cases of less severe hearing loss.

It may well be that many forms of 'nonsyndromic' genetic deafness have associated non-auditory features. Initially one may not know exactly where or how to look for these, but once the expression profile of a given deafness gene is determined, the opportunity to refine phenotypes should be explored. There is already an example that vindicates this strategy. The original DFNB4 family was subsequently shown to have Pendred syndrome9.

As the era of gene mapping and cloning proceeds, functional clues from many of the newly identified 'deafness' genes are being pieced together. There remains a list of unexplained auditory system phenomena such as outer hair cell motility, and a growing catalogue of gene products necessary for hearing. Only a few DFNA and DFNB genes have been linked to specific roles in auditory function, and many deafness genes are currently unknown (see Fig. 2 for the latest locus map). Nevertheless, each new 'deafness' gene is received with fanfare in anticipation that a novel molecular correlate of auditory function may eventually be discovered, and DFNB9 is no exception. With the identification of every hereditary hearing loss gene, we come closer to making sense out of sound.

Figure 2. Cytogenetic locations of genes for syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing loss illustrated on a human male karyotype.
Figure 2 thumbnail

Hearing loss occurring as an isolated disorder is referred to as nonsyndromic whereas it is referred to as syndromic when co-segregating with any non-auditory abnormalities. Gene symbols for independently mapped hearing loss loci that are discovered to be due to allelic mutations are separated by a slash (/). For example, the families used to map DFNB21, DFNA8 and DFNA12 on chromosome 11q are all segregating alleles of TECTA, which encodessalpha-tectorin10, 11. An online compendium of mutations of many of these genes can be found at the Human Genetics Mutations Database (http://www.uwcm.ac.uk/uwcm/mg/hgmd0.html). Additional unpublished information about DFNA and DFNB loci can be found on the Hereditary Hearing Loss web site (http://dnalab-www.uia.ac.be/dnalab/hhh).



Full FigureFull Figure and legend (70K)
 Top
REFERENCES
  1. Yasunaga et al. Nature Genet. 21, 363−369 (1999). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  2. Nobili, R., Mammano, F. & Ashmore, J. Trends Neurosci. 21, 159−167 (1998). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Brownell, W.E. et al. Science 227, 194−196 (1985). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  4. Morton, C.C. Nature Genet. 17, 370−371 (1997). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Heller, S. & Hudspeth, A.J. Nature Med. 4, 560−561 (1998). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Kubisch, C. et al. Cell 96, 437−446 (1999). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  7. Holt, J.R. & Corey, D.P. Neuron 22, 217−219 (1999). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  8. Cohen, Y.E. & Knudsen, E.I. Trends Neurosci. 22, 128−134 (1999). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Li, X.C. et al. Nature Genet. 18, 215−217 (1998). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Mustapha, M. et al. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 409−412 (1999). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Verhoeven, K. et al. Nature Genet. 19, 60−62 (1998). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
 Top
FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

naturejobs

Figures & Tables
References
See also: Article by Yasunaga et al.
Export citation
Export references
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Genetics
ISSN: 1061-4036
EISSN: 1546-1718
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©1999 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy