Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Free Association (blog)
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
Reprints and permissions
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Nature Methods
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
news@nature.com
Nature Conferences
Nature Reports Stem Cells
RNAi Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Letter
Nature Genetics  16, 79 - 83 (1997)
doi:10.1038/ng0597-79

Organization of the Fugu rubripes Hox clusters: evidence for continuing evolution of vertebrate Hox complexes

Samuel Aparicio1, 8, Kelvin Hawker1, Amanda Cottage2, Yoshikazu Mikawa3, Lin Zuo4, Byrappa Venkatesh5, Elson Chen6, Robb Krumlauf7 & Sydney Brenner3

  1Wellcome/CRC Institute for Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK and ICRF Cell Interactions Unit, MRC Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK.

  2MRC HGMP Resource Centre, Hinxton Hall, Cambridge CB10 1SB, UK.

  3The Molecular Sciences Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.

  4Sequana Therapeutics, 11099 North Terry Pines Road, Suite 160, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.

  5IMCB, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260.

  6Advanced Center for Genetic Technology, Applied Biosystems Division of Perkin Elmer Corp, 850 Lincoln Centre Drive, Foster City, California 94404, USA.

  7Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, London NW71AA, UK.

  8e-mail: saparici@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk.

The clustered organization of Hox genes provides a powerful opportunity to examine gene gain and loss in evolution because physical linkage is a key diagnostic feature which allows homology to be established unambiguously. Furthermore, Hox genes play a key role in determination of axial and appendicular skeletal morphology1,2 and may be a key component of the evolution of diverse metazoan body forms. Despite suggestions that changes in Hox gene number played a role in evolution of metazoan body plans3,4, there has been a general lack of evidence for such variation amongst gnathostomes (or indeed any vertebrate) and it has therefore been widely assumed that differential regulation may be the key element in all vertebrate Hox evolution. We have studied the Hox gene clusters of a teleost fish, Fugu rubripes, to test the possibility that Hox organization may have varied since the origin of jawed vertebrates. We have identified four Hox complexes in Fugu and found an unprecedented degree of variation when compared with tetrapod clusters. Our data show that: Fugu clusters are widely variant with respect to length; at least nine genes have been lost; there is a new group-2 paralogue; and pseudogene remnants of group-1 and group-3 paralogues were found in the Hoxc complex, when compared with the present mammalian clusters. We show that gene loss after duplication of the prototypical vertebrate Hox clusters is a key feature of both tetrapod and fish evolution.


REFERENCES
  1. Krumlauf, R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 78, 191−201 (1994). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  2. Burke, A.C., Nelson, C.E., Morgan, B.A. & Tabin, C. Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Development 121, 333−346 (1995). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Lewis, E. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276, 565−570 (1978). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  4. Akam, M. Hox genes and the evolution of diverse body plans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 349, 313−319 (1995). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Nelson, J. Fishes of the World 1−600 (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1994).
  6. Tyler, J., Osteology, phylogeny and higher classification of the fishes of the order Plectognathii (Tetraodontiformes). NOAA Tech. Rept. NMFS Circ. 434, 1−122 (1980).
  7. Pollock, R.A., Sreenath, T., Ngo, L. & Bieberich, C.J. Gain of function mutations for paralogous hox genes — implications for the evolution of hox gene-function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 4492−4496 (1995). | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  8. Pollock, R.A., Jay, G. & Bieberich, C.J. Altering the boundaries of Hox3.1 expression: evidence for antipodal gene regulation. Cell 71, 911−23 (1992). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Horan, G. et al. Compound mutants for the paralogous Hoxa-4, Hoxb-4, and Hoxd-4 genes show more complete homeotic transformations and a dose-dependent increase in the number of vertebrae transformed. Genes Dev. 9, 1667−1677 (1995). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Jegalian, B.G. & De, R.E. Homeotic transformations in the mouse induced by overexpression of a human Hox3.3 transgene. Cell 71, 901−910 (1992). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Nonchev, S. et al. The conserved role of krox-20 in directing Hox gene expression during vertebrate hindbrain segmentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci (USA) 93, 9339−9345 (1996). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  12. Marshall, H., et al. A conserved retinoic acid response element required for early expression of the homeobox gene Hoxb-1. Nature 370, 567−571 (1994). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  13. Aparicio, S. et al. Detecting conserved regulatory elements with the model genome of the Japanese puffer fish, Fugu rubripes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 1684−1688 (1995). | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  14. Popperl, H. et al. Segmental expression of Hoxb-1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/pbx. Cell 81, 1031−1042 (1995). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  15. Brenner, S. et al. Characterization of the pufferfish (Fugu) genome as a compact model vertebrate genome. Nature 366, 265−268 (1993). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  16. Graham, A., Papalopulu, N. & Krumlauf, R. The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell 57, 367−378 (1989). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  17. Zeltser, L., Desplan, C. & Heintz, N. Hoxb-13 — a new hox gene in a distant region of the hoxb cluster maintains colinearity. Development 122, 2475−2484 (1996). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  18. Duboule, D. Guidebook to the Homeobox Genes. 284(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994).
  19. Vanderhoeven, R., Sordino, P., Fraudeau, N., Izpisuabelmonte, J.C. & Duboule, D. Teleost hoxd and hoxa genes — comparison with tetrapods and functional evolution of the hoxd complex. Mech. Dev. 54, 9−21 (1996). | Article | PubMed  | ISI |
  20. Garciafernandez, J. & Holland, P. Archetypal organization of the amphioxus Hox gene-cluster. Nature 370, 563−566 (1994). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  21. Misof, B.Y. & Wagner, G.P. Evidence for 4 Hox clusters in the killifish fundulus-heteroclitus (teleostei). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5, 309−322 (1996). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  22. Misof, B.Y., Blanco, M.J. & Wagner, G.P. PCR-survey of Hox-genes of the zebrafish — new sequence information and evolutionary implications. J. Exp. Zool. 274, 193−206 (1996). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  23. Scott, M.P. Vertebrate homeobox gene nomenclature. Cell 71, 551−553 (1992). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  24. Pendleton, J., Nagai, B.K., Murtha, M.T. & Ruddle, F.H. Expansion of the Hox gene family and the evolution of chordates. Proc. Natl. Acad, Sci. USA 90, 6300−6304 (1993). | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  25. Acampora, D. et al. The human HOX gene family. Nucl. Acids Res. 17, 10385−10402 (1989). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  26. Altschul, S., Gish, W., Miller, M., Myers, E.W. & Lipman, D.J. A basic local alignment search tool. J. Molec. Biol. 215, 403−410 (1990). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  27. Church, G. & Gilbert, W., Genome sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 1991−1995 (1984). | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  28. Thompson, J., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 22, 4673−4680 (1995). | ISI |
  29. Staden, R. An interactive graphics program for comparing and aligning nucleic acid and amino acid sequences. Nucl. Acids Res. 10, 2951−2961 (1982). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
 Top
 Top
References
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

References
Export citation
Export references
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Genetics
ISSN: 1061-4036
EISSN: 1546-1718
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©1997 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy