Nature | News Feature

What sparked the Cambrian explosion?

An evolutionary burst 540 million years ago filled the seas with an astonishing diversity of animals. The trigger behind that revolution is finally coming into focus.

Article tools

John Sibbick/Natural History Museum

The Cambrian seas teemed with new types of animal, such as the predator Anomalocaris (centre).

A series of dark, craggy pinnacles rises 80 metres above the grassy plains of Namibia. The peaks call to mind something ancient — the burial mounds of past civilizations or the tips of vast pyramids buried by the ages.

The stone formations are indeed monuments of a faded empire, but not from anything hewn by human hands. They are pinnacle reefs, built by cyanobacteria on the shallow sea floor 543 million years ago, during a time known as the Ediacaran period. The ancient world occupied by these reefs was truly alien. The oceans held so little oxygen that modern fish would quickly founder and die there. A gooey mat of microbes covered the sea floor at the time, and on that blanket lived a variety of enigmatic animals whose bodies resembled thin, quilted pillows. Most were stationary, but a few meandered blindly over the slime, grazing on the microbes. Animal life at this point was simple, and there were no predators. But an evolutionary storm would soon upend this quiet world.

Within several million years, this simple ecosystem would disappear, and give way to a world ruled by highly mobile animals that sported modern anatomical features. The Cambrian explosion, as it is called, produced arthropods with legs and compound eyes, worms with feathery gills and swift predators that could crush prey in tooth-rimmed jaws. Biologists have argued for decades over what ignited this evolutionary burst. Some think that a steep rise in oxygen sparked the change, whereas others say that it sprang from the development of some key evolutionary innovation, such as vision. The precise cause has remained elusive, in part because so little is known about the physical and chemical environment at that time.

But over the past several years, discoveries have begun to yield some tantalizing clues about the end of the Ediacaran. Evidence gathered from the Namibian reefs and other sites suggests that earlier theories were overly simplistic — that the Cambrian explosion actually emerged out of a complex interplay between small environmental changes that triggered major evolutionary developments.

Some scientists now think that a small, perhaps temporary, increase in oxygen suddenly crossed an ecological threshold, enabling the emergence of predators. The rise of carnivory would have set off an evolutionary arms race that led to the burst of complex body types and behaviours that fill the oceans today. “This is the most significant event in Earth evolution,” says Guy Narbonne, a palaeobiologist at Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. “The advent of pervasive carnivory, made possible by oxygenation, is likely to have been a major trigger.”

Energy to burn

In the modern world, it's easy to forget that complex animals are relative newcomers to Earth. Since life first emerged more than 3 billion years ago, single-celled organisms have dominated the planet for most of its history. Thriving in environments that lacked oxygen, they relied on compounds such as carbon dioxide, sulfur-containing molecules or iron minerals that act as oxidizing agents to break down food. Much of Earth's microbial biosphere still survives on these anaerobic pathways.

Animals, however, depend on oxygen — a much richer way to make a living. The process of metabolizing food in the presence of oxygen releases much more energy than most anaerobic pathways. Animals rely on this potent, controlled combustion to drive such energy-hungry innovations as muscles, nervous systems and the tools of defence and carnivory — mineralized shells, exoskeletons and teeth.

Given the importance of oxygen for animals, researchers suspected that a sudden increase in the gas to near-modern levels in the ocean could have spurred the Cambrian explosion. To test that idea, they have studied ancient ocean sediments laid down during the Ediacaran and Cambrian periods, which together ran from about 635 million to 485 million years ago.

In Namibia, China and other spots around the world, researchers have collected rocks that were once ancient seabeds, and analysed the amounts of iron, molybdenum and other metals in them. The metals' solubility depends strongly on the amount of oxygen present, so the amount and type of those metals in ancient sedimentary rocks reflect how much oxygen was in the water long ago, when the sediments formed.

These proxies seemed to indicate that oxygen concentrations in the oceans rose in several steps, approaching today's sea-surface concentrations at the start of the Cambrian, around 541 million years ago — just before more-modern animals suddenly appeared and diversified. This supported the idea of oxygen as a key trigger for the evolutionary explosion.

But last year, a major study1 of ancient sea-floor sediments challenged that view. Erik Sperling, a palaeontologist at Stanford University in California, compiled a database of 4,700 iron measurements taken from rocks around the world, spanning the Ediacaran and Cambrian periods. He and his colleagues did not find a statistically significant increase in the proportion of oxic to anoxic water at the boundary between the Ediacaran and the Cambrian.

“Any oxygenation event must have been far, far smaller than what people normally considered,” concludes Sperling. Most people assume “that the oxygenation event essentially raised oxygen to essentially modern-day levels. And that probably wasn't the case”, he says.

The latest results come at a time when scientists are already reconsidering what was happening to ocean oxygen levels during this crucial period. Donald Canfield, a geobiologist at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense, doubts that oxygen was a limiting factor for early animals. In a study published last month2, he and his colleagues suggest that oxygen levels were already high enough to support simple animals, such as sponges, hundreds of millions of years before they actually appeared. Cambrian animals would have needed more oxygen than early sponges, concedes Canfield. “But you don't need an increase in oxygen across the Ediacaran/Cambrian boundary,” he says; oxygen could already have been abundant enough “for a long, long time before”.

“The role of oxygen in the origins of animals has been heavily debated,” says Timothy Lyons, a geobiologist at the University of California, Riverside. “In fact, it's never been more debated than it is now.” Lyons sees a role for oxygen in evolutionary changes, but his own work3 with molybdenum and other trace metals suggests that the increases in oxygen just before the Cambrian were mostly temporary peaks that lasted a few million years and gradually stepped upward (see 'When life sped up').

Nik Spencer/Nature

Modern mirrors

Sperling has looked for insights into Ediacaran oceans by studying oxygen-depleted regions in modern seas around the globe. He suggests that biologists have conventionally taken the wrong approach to thinking about how oxygen shaped animal evolution. By pooling and analysing previously published data with some of his own, he found that tiny worms survive in areas of the sea floor where oxygen levels are incredibly low — less than 0.5% of average global sea-surface concentrations. Food webs in these oxygen-poor environments are simple, and the animals feed directly on microbes. In places where sea-floor oxygen levels are a bit higher — about 0.5–3% of concentrations at the sea surface — animals are more abundant but their food webs remain limited: the animals still feed on microbes rather than on each other. But around somewhere between 3% and 10% oxygen levels, predators emerge and start to consume other animals4.

The implications of this finding for evolution are profound, Sperling says.The modest oxygen rise that he thinks may have occurred just before the Cambrian would have been enough to trigger a big change. “If oxygen levels were 3% and they rose past that 10% threshold, that would have had a huge influence on early animal evolution,” he says. “There's just so much in animal ecology, lifestyle and body size that seems to change so dramatically through those levels.”

The gradual emergence of predators, driven by a small rise in oxygen, would have meant trouble for Ediacaran animals that lacked obvious defences. “You're looking at soft-bodied, mostly immobile forms that probably lived their lives by absorbing nutrients through their skin,” says Narbonne.

Studies of those ancient Namibian reefs suggest that animals were indeed starting to fall prey to predators by the end of the Ediacaran. When palaeobiologist Rachel Wood from the University of Edinburgh, UK, examined the rock formations, she found spots where a primitive animal called Cloudina had taken over parts of the microbial reef. Rather than spreading out over the ocean floor, these cone-shaped creatures lived in crowded colonies, which hid their vulnerable body parts from predators — an ecological dynamic that occurs in modern reefs5.

Cloudina were among the earliest animals known to have grown hard, mineralized exoskeletons. But they were not alone. Two other types of animal in those reefs also had mineralized parts, which suggests that multiple, unrelated groups evolved skeletal shells around the same time. “Skeletons are quite costly to produce,” says Wood. “It's very difficult to come up with a reason other than defence for why an animal should bother to create a skeleton for itself.” Wood thinks that the skeletons provided protection against newly evolved predators. Some Cloudina fossils from that period even have holes in their sides, which scientists interpret as the marks of attackers that bore into the creatures' shells6.

Palaeontologists have found other hints that animals had begun to eat each other by the late Ediacaran. In Namibia, Australia and Newfoundland in Canada, some sea-floor sediments have preserved an unusual type of tunnel made by an unknown, wormlike creature7. Called Treptichnus burrows, these warrens branch again and again, as if a predator just below the microbial mat had systematically probed for prey animals on top. The Treptichnus burrows resemble those of modern priapulid, or 'penis', worms — voracious predators that hunt in a remarkably similar way on modern sea floors8.

The rise of predation at this time put large, sedentary Ediacaran animals at a big disadvantage. “Sitting around doing nothing becomes a liability,” says Narbonne.

The world in 3D

The moment of transition from the Ediacaran to the Cambrian world is recorded in a series of stone outcrops rounded by ancient glaciers on the south edge of Newfoundland. Below that boundary are impressions left by quilted Ediacaran animals, the last such fossils recorded on Earth. And just 1.2 metres above them, the grey siltstone holds trails of scratch marks, thought to have been made by animals with exoskeletons, walking on jointed legs — the earliest evidence of arthropods in Earth's history.

No one knows how much time passed in that intervening rock — maybe as little as a few centuries or millennia, says Narbonne. But during that short span, the soft-bodied, stationary Ediacaran fauna suddenly disappeared, driven to extinction by predators, he suggests.

“This is the most significant event in Earth evolution.”

Narbonne has closely studied the few fauna that survived this transition, and his findings suggest that some of them had acquired new, more complex types of behaviour. The best clues come from traces left by peaceful, wormlike animals that grazed on the microbial mat. Early trails from about 555 million years ago meander and criss-cross haphazardly, indicating a poorly developed nervous system that was unable to sense or react to other grazers nearby — let alone predators. But at the end of the Ediacaran and into the early Cambrian, the trails become more sophisticated: creatures carved tighter turns and ploughed closely spaced, parallel lines through the sediments. In some cases, a curvy feeding trail abruptly transitions into a straight line, which Narbonne interprets as potential evidence of the grazer evading a predator9.

This change in grazing style may have contributed to the fragmentation of the microbial mat, which began early in the Cambrian. And the transformation of the sea floor, says Narbonne, “may have been the most profound change in the history of life on Earth”10, 11. The mat had previously covered the seabed like a coating of plastic wrap, leaving the underlying sediments largely anoxic and off limits to animals. Because animals could not burrow deeply in the Ediacaran, he says, “the mat meant that life was two-dimensional”. When grazing capabilities improved, animals penetrated the mat and made the sediments habitable for the first time, which opened up a 3D world.

Tracks from the early Cambrian show that animals started to burrow several centimetres into the sediments beneath the mat, which provided access to previously untapped nutrients — as well as a refuge from predators. It's also possible that animals went in the opposite direction. Sperling says that the need to avoid predators (and pursue prey) may have driven animals into the water column above the seabed, where enhanced oxygen levels enabled them to expend energy through swimming.

The emerging evidence about oxygen thresholds and ecology could also shed light on another major evolutionary question: when did animals originate? The first undisputed fossils of animals appear only 580 million years ago, but genetic evidence indicates that basic animal groups originated as far back as 700 million to 800 million years ago. According to Lyons, the solution may be that oxygen levels rose to perhaps 2% or 3% of modern levels around 800 million years ago. These concentrations could have sustained small, simple animals, just as they do today in the ocean's oxygen-poor zones. But animals with large bodies could not have evolved until oxygen levels climbed higher in the Ediacaran.

Understanding how oxygen influenced the appearance of complex animals will require scientists to tease more-subtle clues out of the rocks. “We've been challenging people working on fossils to tie their fossils more closely to our oxygen proxies,” says Lyons. It will mean deciphering what oxygen levels were in different ancient environments, and connecting those values with the kinds of traits exhibited by the animal fossils found in the same locations.

This past autumn, Woods visited Siberia with that goal in mind. She collected fossils of Cloudina and another skeletonized animal, Suvorovella, from the waning days of the Ediacaran. Those sites gave her the chance to gather fossils from many different depths in the ancient ocean, from the more oxygen-rich surface waters to deeper zones. Wood plans to look for patterns in where animals were growing tougher skeletons, whether they were under attack by predators and whether any of this had a clear link with oxygen levels, she says. “Only then can you pick out the story.”

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
530,
Pages:
268–270
Date published:
()
DOI:
doi:10.1038/530268a

References

  1. Sperling, E. A. et al. Nature 523, 451454 (2015).

  2. Zhang, S. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA http://doi.org/bcgg (2016).

  3. Sahoo, S. K. et al. Geobiology (in the press).

  4. Sperling, E. A. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1344613451 (2013).

  5. Wood, R. A. et al. Precambrian Res. 261, 252271 (2015).

  6. Bengtson, S. & Zhao, Y. Science 257, 367369 (1992).

  7. Seilacher, A., Buatois, L. A. & Mángano, M. G. Palaeogeog. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 227, 323356 (2005).

  8. Vannier, J., Calandra, I., Gaillard, C. & Zylinska, A. Geology 38, 711714 (2010).

  9. Carbone, C. & Narbonne, G. M. J. Paleontol. 88, 309330 (2014).

  10. Mángano, M. G. & Buatois, L. A. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140038 (2014).

  11. Buatois, L. A., Narbonne, G. M., Mángano, M. C. Carmona, N. B. & Myrow, P. Nature Commun. 5, 3544 (2014).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Douglas Fox is a journalist in northern California.

Author details

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

10 comments Subscribe to comments

  1. Avatar for Majid Ali
    Majid Ali
    Chronic Disease Is Evolution in Reverse My long journey to this simple statement started with a notion that also led me to subscribe to the view that oxygen was responsible for the explosive Cambrian speciation. This, it seems now, is what completely replaced the earlier, simpler, non-predatory Ediacaran ecologic order of life on the planet Earth. How could have I, a young London surgeon in mid-sixties, anticipated these messages from oxygen in oceanic waters 540 million years ago ? The idea of linking human disease to human evolution and ecologic relatedness of the organ-systems of the body developed about four decades ago with a simple question: what might be the boundary between the state of health and states of absence of health? I recognized then that for the answer to the question, I needed to reach beyond microscopes and laboratory technology at my disposal as the Director of the Department of Pathology and Laboratories at Holy Name Medical Center, Teaneck, New Jersey, as well as a faculty member at Columbia University, New York. In 1968, I received the diploma of the Fellow of Royal College of Surgeons, England. By then, the events surrounding my mother’s death twelve years earlier had receded. She was a Hafiz-e-Quran and suffered from pulmonary tuberculosis. She regularly asked me to listen to her recitations. Her cough often sprayed bloody sputum on my face. I was infected but never became sick. During those years of surgical work, nothing could have been farther from my mind than the question of what might have primacy in desert ecology, the seed or the soil? Or in the human body, the microbe or the host? In 1983, I published a monograph entitled Spontaneity of Oxidation in Nature and Aging (ref 1), in which I put forth my oxidative theory of aging. This spontaneity seemed to initiate and drive the redox dynamics in the body and also appeared to be a highly plausible primal mechanism for disease initiation and progression. Then I also recognized the crucial need for ecologic thinking in clinical medicine and published a monograph entitled Altered States of Bowel Ecology (ref 2) to focus on the centrality of the bowel in all deliberations of health/dis-ease/disease continuum. In my book, Oxygen and Aging (2000), I expanded that model to incorporate my rudimentary notions of oxygen signaling and called it the oxygen model of aging. (ref 3). In the early 1990s, I had my “oxygen eureka moment,” in which I saw two things clearly: (1) all chronic diseases were rooted in dysfunctional oxygen signaling; and (2) restoration of oxygen homeostasis was the true nature of healing from chronic disease. In 2004, I began my column entitled Oxygen Homeostasis in Townsend Letter and presented evidence of respiratory-to-fermentative shift in ATP generation in chronic energy deficit states (ref 4). This was validated ten years later by the work of others (ref 5), as well as my own follow up studies of the Krebs cycle (ref 6). My continued clinical, microscopic, and biochemical studies in molecular biology of oxygen led to the development of my oxygen models of inflammation, autoimmunity, obesity, diabetes, cardiac myocytic disease, coronary artery disease, chronic renal failure, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and many other diseases described fully in Darwin and Dysox Triology (ref 7-9). Twenty seven years after I published Altered States of Bowel Ecology, the journal Nature fully endorsed that position in a 2010 article with the following words: “By 2020, personalized health care could involve doctors monitoring the metabolic activities of a patient’s gut microbes and, possibly, modulating them therapeutically” (Nature 2010;463:32). Next, consider the following words, again from journal Nature: “World Health Organization warns that world may be heading into a ‘post-antibiotics era’” Nature (2014;516:302). What mysteries for human health do oceans hide? What does oxygen have yet to reveal about healing? Water and oxygen continue to be awe-inspiring. References 1. Ali M. Spontaneity of Oxidation in Nature and Aging, (monograph). Teaneck, NJ, 1983. 2. Ali M. Altered States of Bowel Ecology - Leaky Cell Membrane Disorder (monograph). Teaneck, NJ, 1987 3. Ali M. Oxygen and Aging. Oxygen and Aging. (2nd ed.) New York, Canary 21 Press. 2004. 4. Ali M. Respiratory-to-Fermentative (RTF) Shift in ATP Production in Chronic Energy Deficit States. Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients. 2004. 253: 64-65 (2004). 5. Chouchani ET, Victoria R. Pell VR, Edoardo Gaude E, et. al. Ischaemic accumulation of succinate controls reperfusion injury through mitochondrial ROS. Nature 515, 431–435. 6. Ali M. Succinate retention. In comments ection of Chouchani ET, Victoria R. Pell VR, Edoardo Gaude E, et. al. Ischaemic accumulation of succinate controls reperfusion injury through mitochondrial ROS. Nature 515, 431–435. 7. Ali M. The Principles and Practice of Integrative Medicine Volume X: Darwin, Oxygen Homeostasis, and Oxystatic Therapies. 3 rd. Edi. 2009 New York. Institute of Integrative Medicine Press. 8. Ali M. The Principles and Practice of Integrative Medicine Volume XI: 3rd. Edi. Darwin, Dysox, and Disease. 3rd. Edi. 2009. New York. (2009) Institute of Integrative Medicine Press. 9. Ali M. The Principles and Practice of Integrative Medicine Volume XII: Darwin, Dysox, and Integrative Protocols. New York (2009). Institute of Integrative Medicine Press.
  2. Avatar for Dave Carlson
    Dave Carlson
    And extraordinary findings ALSO require extraordinary claims: Imagine that the sudden appearance of modern phyla are indeed as extraordinary as they appear to be, requiring an origin rather than the typical backpeddling.of falsified theories which resort to fine tuning or ad hoc secondary mechanisms to remain on life support. The poster child of a falsified theory is "Pebble Accretion" which was falsified by the discovery of 'hot Jupiters', until the ad hoc secondary mechanism of _Planetary Migration_ was cooked up to keep it on life support. Instead, I suggest that hot Jupiters are telegraphing an alternative planet formation mechanism that REQUIRES a bimodal separation between 'cold Jupiters' and 'hot Jupiters', whereas planetary migration is not a bright line mechanism. 'Alien contamination' fits the bill, which I suggest was disseminated from the in-spiral merger of a former binary brown-dwarf Companion to the Sun, whose asymmetrical merger gave the newly-merged Companion escape velocity from the Sun. Productive theories explain more than they set out to explain, whereas ad hoc theories are generally fine tuning adjustments or ad hoc secondary mechanism alterations to a creaking standard model to reverse a falsification due to new evidence. A binary in-spiral merger of a former binary brown dwarf Companion would cause the Sun-Companion solar system barycenter (SSB) to spiral out from the Sun over time (by Galilean relativity), with the SSB causing the late heavy bombardment (LHB) as the SSB spiraled out through the Kuiper belt cubewanos from 4.1 - 3.8 Ga. (This predicts a an earlier [circa 4.22 Ga] LHB pulse as the SSB spiraled through the much tighter grouped Plutinos, for which there's extensive evidence from Apollo return samples.) And the loss of the centrifugal force of the Sun around the former SSB at 542 Ma would have lowered all heliocentric orbits slightly, which could explain the slight retrograde rotation of Venus if it had originally been in a synchronous orbit around the Sun. And the concomitant disruption on Earth is evident in the Great Unconformity, which changing oxygen levels can't explain. So contamination with free-swimming (room-temperature spectral class Y) brown dwarf lifeforms from a water vapor/supercritical cloud banks (like those that exist on Jupiter), along with Jupiter-like lightening strikes to provide free oxygen/ozone, is suggested to be the origin of the new phyla that appeared in the Cambrian Explosion on Earth. And this makes the prediction that earliest appearances of new Cambrian phyla were free swimming or free drifting organisms, not benthic organisms like later trilobites.
  3. Avatar for Elizabeth Maas
    Elizabeth Maas
    While reading this interesting article, I was hounded by a question: What was the ongoing parallel evolution of the immune system and its response regulation? Recognition of self vs not-self, a function of the immune system, is extremely important to an organism. The nervous system is also a side-arm of this evolutionary giant step in recognition of self-vs not-self (eg., mobility, thermal, visual sense, etc.
  4. Avatar for Fernando Aleman
    Fernando Aleman
    I think you are talking about complex organisms that developed way later than the Cambrian.
  5. Avatar for Robert Arnold
    Robert Arnold
    Like the principle of population inversion for lasers, seemingly insignificant thermodynamic changes can evolve into energy throughput dominance and thereby subsume the previous system. This principle is invariant across the domains of lithosphere, biosphere and noosphere. Indeed, it is the basis for human development and hypothesis formation from time immemorial.
  6. Avatar for James Graham
    James Graham
    Of this we can be certain: the founding gene pools of the earliest Bilaterians (the entire animal kingdom minus sponges and cnidarians) somehow learned to produce with great precision multicells of complexity not seen in the colonial forms. My (published) proposal is that they acquired that ability because they experienced lethal juvenile cancer. Because it begins in a single mis-replicated somatic cell it follows that selection pressure to avoid death from cancer during development was equivalent to selection pressure to replicate with utmost precision. http://cancerselection.blogspot.com/2015/06/on-cambrian-explosion.html
  7. Avatar for Ilya Grushevskiy
    Ilya Grushevskiy
    I can't help but wonder how all of these things tasted! :p
  8. Avatar for David Peters
    David Peters
    Missing from the hypothesis are all the various unfossilized flat, ribbon and round worm morphologies that were precursors to the various deuterostomates and protostomates that are found in Cambrian sediments.
  9. Avatar for A Q
    A Q
    It makes a lot of sense to me, and is encouraging to hear mentioned, that: "The precise cause has remained elusive, in part because so little is known about the physical and chemical environment at that time." The reasoning behind that statement seems solid, and it's very understandable that not much would be known about the physical and chemical environment during the time period. I haven't ran across anyone who was there and could vouch for what was going on exactly, so we dont have many facts to work with here obviously, just the grand ol battle of wits between the intelligent and highly educated hypothesis makers out there...otherwise known as "your guess is as good as mine" in most circles. So on one hand we dont know very much about that time period...and on the other hand we know enough that it can be stated (with certainty) that, "The oceans held so little oxygen that modern fish would quickly founder and die there. A gooey mat of microbes covered the sea floor at the time" Or how about this observation: (not to be confused with an "observed" observation) "the Cambrian explosion actually emerged out of a complex interplay between small environmental changes that triggered major evolutionary developments. Or this one: "Thriving in environments that lacked oxygen, they relied on compounds such as carbon dioxide, sulfur-containing molecules or iron minerals that act as oxidizing agents to break down food." We sure do know a lot about what we don't know much about.
  10. Avatar for Joe Miano
    Joe Miano
    Man, there's a lot of Faith and speculation here! I submit that there are much bigger and more relevant questions we face today that need urgent attention.

Refugee trauma

refugee-mental-health

The mental-health crisis among migrants

The refugees and migrants surging into Europe are suffering very high levels of psychiatric disorders. Researchers are struggling to help.

Newsletter

The best science news from Nature and beyond, direct to your inbox every day.

Deadly mutants?

genetic-mutants

A radical revision of human genetics

Why many ‘deadly’ gene mutations are turning out to be harmless.

Artificial intelligence

AI-blindspot

There is a blind spot in AI research

Fears about the future impacts of artificial intelligence are distracting researchers from the real risks of deployed systems.

Brain implant

paralysis

Pioneering brain implant restores paralysed man's sense of touch

More-advanced implants will be needed to restore full sensation throughout the body.

ExoMars

Schiaparelli-lander

Europe and Russia prepare for historic landing on Mars

Schiaparelli touchdown would be ESA's first success on the red planet.

Nature Podcast

new-pod-red

Listen

This week, refugee mental health, better neural nets, and changing attitudes to female genital cutting.

Science jobs from naturejobs