Nature | News

US budget deal gives small increases to research

US President Obama expected to sign legislation that also includes $5.4 billion for Ebola fight.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

John Moore/Getty

The US government is poised to spend $5.2 billion on Ebola aid and research in fiscal year 2015.

NASA and the US National Science Foundation would see their budgets rise in fiscal year 2015 under a US$1.1 trillion spending bill approved by the US Congress.

The measure, passed by the House on 11 December and by the Senate on 13 December, also includes an additional $5.4 billion in aid and research funds for the Ebola epidemic in West Africa. US President Barack Obama is expected to sign the bill into law, finalizing the budget for US agencies through 30 September 2015 (see ‘Budget highlights’).

Overall, the bill would increase spending on research and development by 1.7% above the 2014 level — in lockstep with the rate of inflation. But the share of money going to basic research would decline by 0.3% in real dollars, according to Matt Hourihan, director of the research and development budget and policy programme at the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington DC.

“The problem is it continues the slow bleed,” says Michael Lubell, the director of public affairs at the American Physical Society in Washington DC. With fiscally conservative Republicans set to control both houses of Congress next year, the budget picture is not likely to improve, he adds — although Obama's ability to veto legislation should ward off large funding cuts.

The Ebola bolus includes $25 million for the Food and Drug Administration for purposes such as expediting drug and vaccine approval. The Department of State, which includes the Agency for International Development, would receive an additional $2.5 billion for Ebola programmes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would get $1.78 billion for its Ebola work in the United States and Africa, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) would receive $238 million for research that includes testing experimental Ebola vaccines.

Budget highlights

How science agencies fared in the budget (US$ millions).

Agency 2014 actual 2015 request 2015 actual
National Institutes of Health 30,003 30,203 30,084
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 5,882 5,474 6,023
Food and Drug Administration 2,640† 2,584 2,597
National Science Foundation 7,142 7,255 7,344
NASA (science) 5,151 4,972 5,245
Department of Energy Office of Science 5,066 5,111 5,071
Environmental Protection Agency 8,200 7,890 8,136
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 5,322 5,497 5,381
US Geological Survey 1,032 1,073 1,045

†Includes one-time transfer of $79 million in user fees.

Source: Source: US Congress & White House Office of Management and Budget

Tough times at the NIH

But the NIAID’s parent agency, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), would not fare as well overall. The spending legislation would increase the NIH budget by only $150 million over the 2014 level — roughly 0.5%. That is disappointing, given that inflation is rising at 2% per year, says Jennifer Zeitzer, deputy director of public affairs at the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology in Bethesda, Maryland.

“There’s an increase, which is something to be grateful for, but the fact is that we are still going backwards,” Zeitzer says.

The NIH budget includes $65 million for the agency’s portion of the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative — a $25-million increase over 2014, but much less than NIH’s wished-for $400 million to $500 million per year for the programme.

Science up at NASA

The outlook is better at NASA, which benefited from a roster of bipartisan supporters in Congress. The agency would receive $18 billion, an increase of $364 million above the 2014 level.

The agency’s science directorate would receive just over $5.2 billion, a bump of $94 million from 2014. Within the directorate, funding for planetary science, astrophysics and heliophysics would increase, while Earth science would take a slight hit.

One big winner at NASA is the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA), a telescope mounted on a Boeing 747 jet. Obama proposed grounding SOFIA in his 2015 budget request released in March, but the programme – developed with the German Aerospace Center (DLR) — found support in Congress.

The bill would also set aside $100 million for a mission to Jupiter’s moon Europa, whose underground ocean is considered one of the most hospitable places for life in the Solar System. NASA has not yet decided on a mission concept, but the general idea of heading to Europa has the backing of Representative John Culberson, the Texas Republican who in January will take the helm of the House subcommittee that oversees NASA’s funding.

NSF rises, energy department flat

The National Science Foundation (NSF) would receive a 2.4% bump over 2014 — “a pleasant surprise”, says Hourihan. Research spending will increase by a total of $125 million across the NSF’s six directorates. That includes the agency’s programmes on social, behavioural and economic sciences, which House Republicans have sought to cut in recent years.

The Department of Energy’s science budget would remain flat at $5.1 billion, although the spending deal approved by Congress would reverse cuts to nuclear-fusion research that were sought by the White House. However, the bill also contains language threatening to withhold the US contribution to ITER, the multibillion-euro international fusion consortium, if the beleaguered project, which is 11 years behind schedule, does not implement management changes.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2014.16553

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.