Nature | From the blog

Should mutant flu data be censored?

Researchers and policy-makers debate the case for redacting avian flu papers.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

On 2 February, scientists and public-health officials squared up to each other in a panel discussion at the New York Academy of Sciences. Debate raged around the fate of two papers that describe mutant forms of avian influenza virus H5N1. These mutated viruses have been shown to be transmissible between ferrets, which has raised concerns that they would be transmissible between other mammals, including humans, with potentially devastating consequences. Several panellists sat down with Nature to discuss their positions.

A full video of the two-hour debate is available from the New York Academy of Sciences. See also our online news special on the H5N1 controversy.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2012.10023

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments

Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.