Nature | News

Science wins reprieve in US budget deal

Congress gives National Institutes of Health a big boost and avoids cuts to research agencies sought by Trump.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

Andrew Seng/Sacramento Bee/ZUMA

The National Institutes of Health would see its budget rise by $2 billion, to $34 billion.

Funding for US science agencies will stay flat or even increase over the next several months, under a US$1-trillion spending deal announced on 30 April. The plan devised by Congress, which covers the remainder of the 2017 budget year, avoids the sharp cuts to science proposed by US President Donald Trump.

The biggest winner is the National Institutes of Health (NIH), whose budget would rise by $2 billion compared with the 2016 level, for a total of $34 billion. The National Science Foundation would remain steady at just under $7.5 billion, and NASA’s budget would rise by about 2%, to $19.7 billion. And the Environmental Protection Agency, which Trump wants to cut by 31% in fiscal year 2018, would receive roughly $8.1 billion, a decrease of about 1% from 2016.

“From our perspective this is a great package, so we can put [fiscal year 2017] behind us and move on with our lives,” says Jennifer Zeitzer, director of legislative relations at the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology in Bethesda, Maryland.

Let's make a deal

The 2017 funding deal negotiated by the US House of Representatives and the Senate diverges from the sharp cuts to science agencies that US President Donald Trump sought in his 2018 budget proposal, released in March. (All numbers below are shown in US$ billions.)

Agency 2016 enacted 2018 Trump request 2017 budget deal
Biomedical research and public health
National Institutes of Health $32.1 billion $25.9 billion $34.1 billion
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention $7.20 billion N/A $7.20 billion
Food and Drug Administration $2.72 billion N/A $2.76 billion
Physical sciences
National Science Foundation $7.46 billion N/A $7.47 billion
NASA $19.3 billion $19.1 billion $19.7 billion
Department of Energy Office of Science $5.35 billion $4.45 billion $5.39 billion
Earth and environment
Environmental Protection Agency $8.14 billion $5.70 billion $8.06 billion
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration $5.77 billion N/A $5.68 billion

Source: US Congress, White House

But that does not mean that scientists can breathe easily just yet: the largely positive 2017 deal does not necessarily indicate how Congress will handle funding for 2018, says Michael Lubell, a physicist at City College of New York in New York City. Lawmakers “have a year to fall in line [with the president] if they want to”, he says.

Trump’s 2018 budget request, released in March, seeks an 18% cut for the NIH and a 5.6% cut to the Department of Energy. It also proposes to eliminate the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), which funds high-risk, high-reward research, along with a global-health research centre at the NIH and the Sea Grant education and research programme at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Breaking down the budget

The 2017 deal formulated by Congress would fund the government until 30 September. Its provisions include:

  • $352 million for the NIH to carry out provisions of the 21st Century Cures Act, a law enacted last year to reform drug development and biomedical research. The bill also includes increases of $400 million for the agency’s Alzheimer’s disease research programme, $120 million for the Precision Medicine Initiative and $110 million for the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative.
  • $1.9 billion for NASA’s Earth-science research programme, roughly equal to the 2016 level. The bill includes support for the Pre-Aerosol, Clouds, and Ocean Ecosystem satellite mission that Trump wants to eliminate.
  • $1.9 billion for planetary science at NASA, an increase of roughly $300 million from the 2016 level. That includes $275 million for a mission to Jupiter’s moon Europa, including a lander. The bill would set aside $408 million for the Mars 2020 mission — and give NASA the green light to investigate the possibility of sending a helicopter to the red planet.
  • $5.7 billion for NOAA, a $90-million drop from the 2016 level.
  • $5.4 billion for the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, a $42-million bump from 2016, and $306 million for ARPA-E.

“This isn’t anything like what the Trump administration had sought,” says Matthew Hourihan, director of the research-and-development budget and policy programme at the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington DC. “This is clearly Congress reasserting its own priorities.”

The House of Representatives is expected to vote on the measure as early as 3 May, with the Senate to follow. Then lawmakers will turn their attention to plans for the 2018 budget year. The White House is expected to release a full budget request in late May that is likely to include the same massive cuts to civilian programmes, and increases for military spending, as the “skinny budget” it released in March.
 

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21835

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments

Commenting is currently unavailable.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.