Nature | News

Mystery humans spiced up ancients’ sex lives

Genome analysis suggests there was interbreeding between modern humans, Neanderthals, Denisovans and an unknown archaic population.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

RIA NOVOSTI/SPL

An excavation in Denisova cave in Siberia, Russia, where remains of Denisovan hominins were first discovered.

Updated genome sequences from two extinct relatives of modern humans suggest that these ‘archaic’ groups bred with humans and with each other more extensively than was previously known.

The ancient genomes, one from a Neanderthal and one from a member of an archaic human group called the Denisovans, were presented on 18 November at a meeting on ancient DNA at the Royal Society in London. The results suggest that interbreeding went on between the members of several ancient human-like groups in Europe and Asia more than 30,000 years ago, including an as-yet-unknown human ancestor from Asia.

“What it begins to suggest is that we’re looking at a Lord of the Rings-type world — that there were many hominid populations,” says Mark Thomas, an evolutionary geneticist at University College London who was at the meeting but was not involved in the work.

The first published Neanderthal1 and Denisovan2 genome sequences revolutionized the study of ancient human history, not least because they showed that these groups bred with anatomically modern humans, contributing to the genetic diversity of many people alive today.

Mixed heritage

All modern humans whose ancestry originates outside of Africa owe about 2% of their genome to Neanderthals. Certain populations living in Oceania, such as Papua New Guineans and Australian Aboriginals, share about 4% of their DNA with Denisovans, members of a group named after a cave in the Altai Mountains in Siberia, Russia, where they were discovered. The cave contains remains deposited between 30,000 and 50,000 years ago.

At the meeting, however, David Reich, an evolutionary geneticist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, who worked on those studies, said that the conclusions were based on low-quality genome sequences, riddled with errors and full of gaps. His team, along with collaborator Svante Pääbo at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, has now produced much more complete versions of the Denisovan and Neanderthal genomes — matching the quality of contemporary human genomes. These high-quality Denisovan and Neanderthal sequences are both based on bones from the Denisova Cave.

The Denisovan genome indicates that the population got around: Reich said at the meeting that as well as interbreeding with the ancestors of Oceanians, they also bred with Neanderthals and the ancestors of modern humans in China and other parts of East Asia. Most surprisingly, Reich said, the genomes indicate that Denisovans interbred with yet another extinct population of archaic humans that lived in Asia more than 30,000 years ago — one that is neither human nor Neanderthal.

The meeting was abuzz with conjecture about the identity of this unknown population of humans. “We don’t have the faintest idea,” says Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the Natural History Museum in London, who was not involved in the work. He speculates that the population could be related to Homo heidelbergensis, a species that left Africa around half a million years ago and later gave rise to Neanderthals in Europe. “Perhaps it lived on in Asia as well,” says Stringer.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2013.14196

References

  1. Green, R. E. et al Science 328, 710722 (2010).

  2. Meyer, M. Science 338, 222226 (2012).

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

27 comments Subscribe to comments

  1. Avatar for Mikel Phipps
    Mikel Phipps
    Our un written history in stories and fairy tails, the simple words and gestures we use like "uh huh" (yes) "hunh auh" (no) "huh" all could be hundreds of thousands of years old.
  2. Avatar for Andreas Schlüter
    Andreas Schlüter
    It is very interesting that from all modern human beings outside Africa the only ones without archaic admixture are the original black inhabitants of the Andaman Islands (politically belonging to India): http://www.worldfpa.org/wp-content/gallery/the-twilight-of-the-jarawas-people-from-andaman-islands/hpa5-the-twilight-of-the-jarawas-people-from-andaman-islands01.jpg In deed it appears so that the Groups of modern Homo Sapiens and the archaic Groups were not mixing as such but surely the phenomen of rape occured when gathering women of Homo Sapiens were met by archaic hunters. That´s why hardly any archaic mitochondrial DNA is found in moderns. The most important development in human Evolution obviously was the fusion of two chromosomal pairs into one in the early devlopment which seperates humans from the great apes. On this in general: http://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/mutation-in-the-number-of-chromosomes-in-evolution/ Possibly Homo Sapiens, Erectus, Heidelbergensis and Denisovan can only be seen as subspecies of humans.as far as biological reproduction is concerned. Andreas Schlüter Sociologist Berlin, Germany
  3. Avatar for Neil Freer
    Neil Freer
    I just joined because the first two comments, first by Charles Ostman "The Anunnaki connection may have more potential than many are currently ready to consider . . . at least the question should be asked" and the second, "Maybe they were Anunnaki... Michael lerman, M.D., Ph.D" resonate directly with my focus for the last 37 years.The Sitchin/Gardner/Freer paradigm (does that violate the guidelines?) shows clearly that the two major items that are being ignored that explain the genetics, beginning and unique evolution of Sapiens Sapiens, i.e. our genetic creation by the Anunnaki and, second, the occurrences of cataclysmic perturbances of the Earth by the passing of our tenth planet (discovered and announced by the IRAS, infrared satellite telescope, Dutch/NASA team in '83 6 times in the mainstream press and then buried) that have nearly wiped out previous hominid species and our species at least once in recorded history (Cataclysm! Allan and Delair). Funding fright, tenure tetanus, keeps the academic and scientific communities from consideration of these major facts and that's a severe handicap.
  4. Avatar for Michael Williamson
    Michael Williamson
    Throwing out a bunch of buzzwords doesn't turn alien conspiracy idiocy into science. IOW: No, nothing you said bears any resemblance to reality, which is why scientists dismiss it.
  5. Avatar for Jody J.
    Jody J.
    So, what is kind of humorous about this, doesn't this mean Africans are the only pure homo sapiens.
  6. Avatar for Andreas Schlüter
    Andreas Schlüter
    Absolutely correct! Proven by the fact that the only modern Humans outside Africa without genetic archaic admixture are the black original inhabitants of the Andaman Islands: http://www.worldfpa.org/wp-content/gallery/the-twilight-of-the-jarawas-people-from-andaman-islands/hpa5-the-twilight-of-the-jarawas-people-from-andaman-islands01.jpg Andreas Schlüter Sociologist Berlin, Germany
  7. Avatar for ivan Siberia
    ivan Siberia
    @Jody J NO DNA testing on sub-Saharan African populations has shown that the ancestors of modern Africans interbred with a now-extinct archaic species, not found in the DNA of non-Africans. Sub-Saharan African interbred with Homo Erectus. Thanks to the African Genome Project, we know that 2% of the genomes of Sub-Saharan negro originally came from another hominid species not found in the DNA of Asian and European. An international team of scientists studied DNA skeletal remains did not look like one from a recent sub-Saharan African , instead it shared similarities with archaic fossil skulls.
  8. Avatar for Charles Ostman
    Charles Ostman
    The Anunnaki connection may have more potential than many are currently ready to consider . . . at least the question should be asked
  9. Avatar for Michael Lerman
    Michael Lerman
    Maybe they were Anunnaki... Michael lerman, M.D., Ph.D.
  10. Avatar for Michael Lerman
    Michael Lerman
    Maybe they were the Anunnaki...
  11. Avatar for allan lindh
    allan lindh
    I remain slightly puzzled why this mysterious "extinct population of archaic humans that lived in Asia more than 30,000 years ago, which is neither human nor Neanderthal" is not simply assumed to be a remnant population of Homo erectus, who clearly persisted, at least in some places in Asia, until the time considered here. At least it seems to me that should be the first cut working hypothesis, and is testable, assuming that eventually Homo erectus fossils will be found from which usable DNA can be extracted.
  12. Avatar for James Vance
    James Vance
    So, one takeaway is that among human and proto-human populations there has consistently been a strong inclination to have a lot of fun that involves sexual activity with anyone willing (and probably some not so willing) -- not that much different than today's world.
  13. Avatar for James T. Dwyer
    James T. Dwyer
    ... Except there are now 7 going on 10 billion of us now! <%)
  14. Avatar for roy vanduyse
    roy vanduyse
    If Hominins of various types were interbreeding in what would have to be termed the recent past, could there not be relic populations still existing today, or by what mechanism were these archaic variations homogenized so quickly?
  15. Avatar for John Barry
    John Barry
    DNA of relic populations (if that is what you mean) could have been wiped off during "population bottleneck" e.g. drastic reductions in the size of human populations. There is evidence in our DNA of some times when we were critically reduced in numbers. It seems that when it happens, we ditch some of our DNA stuff, to put it that way. The rules of what remains and what goes away seems to be dictated by what is useful in terms of natural selection.
  16. Avatar for Michael Chisnall
    Michael Chisnall
    Maybe it was the red deer cave people?
  17. Avatar for greg hunter
    greg hunter
    sooooooo neolithic.
  18. Avatar for Todd Prescott
    Todd Prescott
    I'm a tad confused, and I hope that the author can clarify. The article states, "Most surprisingly, Reich said, the new genomes indicate that Denisovans interbred with another extinct population of archaic humans that lived in Asia more than 30,000 years ago, which is neither human nor Neanderthal." This is confusing because I have to ask how is it that an extinct population of archaic humans can be neither human nor Neanderthal? Should it read as “archaic hominins”… or “that is neither modern human nor Neanderthal” or something else perhaps? Thanks in advance - TODD
  19. Avatar for James T. Dwyer
    James T. Dwyer
    I agree - IMO the statement in question should conclude: “... that is neither modern human nor Neanderthal”.
  20. Avatar for Maxwell Peterson
    Maxwell Peterson
    I have a question - the line "All humans whose ancestry originates outside of Africa owe about 2% of their genome to Neanderthals" seems to suggest that there exist some humans who did /not/ originate in Africa. I don't understand - didn't all humans originate in Africa? Thanks!
  21. Avatar for Andreas Schlüter
    Andreas Schlüter
    They all originated from Africa, what is meant is that modern Homo Sapiens when spreading from Africa into the world absorbed an average 2% of archaic human genetical material - wih exeption of the original Andaman Isländers: http://www.worldfpa.org/wp-content/gallery/the-twilight-of-the-jarawas-people-from-andaman-islands/hpa5-the-twilight-of-the-jarawas-people-from-andaman-islands01.jpg Andreas Schlüter Sociologist Berlin, Germany
  22. Avatar for The Ox
    The Ox
    I'm sorry this make no sense and is unscientific. If an earlier pre-sapien homo species had left Africa, then those species that left would have been related to the very same subspecies that existed at the time in Africa, not to Homo Sapiens of today. Thus, when the actual Homo Sapiens indeed leave Africa and bred with Homo N. and Homo D. and now "Homo other", then the resulting species can no longer be called Homo Sapiens. I do not understand how science is getting away with classifying any mixed Homo S. as Homo S. and not Homo D. or N.?
  23. Avatar for Ewen Callaway
    Ewen Callaway
    You are correct that all anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens) originated in Africa. What we meant by "non-Africans" was humans who descend from the population(s) that left Africa around 100,000 years ago or so. They later encountered archaic populations, such as Neanderthals and Denisovans, who were the descendants of populations that left Africa even earlier than anatomically modern humans.
  24. Avatar for James T. Dwyer
    James T. Dwyer
    I agree - there doesn't seem to be any evidence indicating that any modern humans' ancestry originated out of Africa - only many who long ago left Africa. As I understand, many of those whose ancestors did not leave Africa long ago (before Neanderthals became extinct) do not share Neanderthals' genome... The exception being, of course to a lesser extent, the offspring of recent African descendants and those who do share Neanderthals' genome. I think the statement should have more correctly read: "Most humans whose ancestors long ago migrated out of Africa owe about 2% of their genome to Neanderthals."
  25. Avatar for Ridge Shan
    Ridge Shan
    There were different phases of human migration out of Africa before the propagation of Homo sapiens sapiens. These independent populations evolved into subspecies of Homo sapiens, such as Neanderthals and Denisovans. Homo sapiens sapiens are believed to be the final wave of migrants, and as such, we encountered and either bred out or killed off these other populations and became the dominant species of the world. This is why Homo sapiens sapiens originating from outside of Africa in the past thousand generations, in Europe, Asia, the Pacific, and the Americas, carry small percentages of Neanderthal, Denisovan, and other Homo or Homo sapiens subspecies genes. Neanderthal genes seem to be the most propagated, with (if I remember correctly) all non-African populations carrying them.
  26. Avatar for Ellie Maldonado
    Ellie Maldonado
    I deleted my question as it's already been answered.
  27. Avatar for Julie Beardsley
    Julie Beardsley
    3.9% Neanderthal representing!

Biological boom

cambrian-explosion

What sparked the Cambrian explosion?

An evolutionary burst 540 million years ago filled the seas with an astonishing diversity of animals. The trigger behind that revolution is finally coming into focus.

Newsletter

The best science news from Nature and beyond, direct to your inbox every day.

Winning waves

LIGO-gravitational-waves

How LIGO forged the path to victory

Historic discovery of ripples in space-time meant ruling out the possibility of a fake signal.

Alien worlds

exoplanets

The truth about exoplanets

Astronomers are beginning to glimpse what exoplanets orbiting distant suns are actually like.

Mouse matters

mouse

A mouse’s house may ruin experiments

Environmental factors lie behind many irreproducible rodent experiments.

Obedience

milgram-obedience

Modern Milgram experiment sheds light on power of authority

People obeying commands feel less responsibility for their actions.

Nature Podcast

soundwave

This week...

Making shipping greener, AAAS conference highlights and human genes in a Neanderthal.

Science jobs from naturejobs