Nature | News

Translations

عربي

Mappers rush to pinpoint landslide risk in Nepal

Geologists say hazard posed by earthquake-loosened earth could linger for years.

Article tools

Prabin Pokhrel/Nepal Police/EPA

The village of Langtang was buried by a landslide last month after a major earthquake struck Nepal.

As Nepal digs out from the devastating magnitude-7.8 earthquake of 25 April, researchers are braced for the next geological hazard. In June, monsoon rains will begin to drench the hillsides destabilized by the quake, raising the risk of disastrous landslides.

Geologists are racing to identify areas that could collapse and bury villages or block important roads. They say that the hazard is likely to linger for years.

So far, the situation has been grim but better than expected. Scientists have identified thousands of landslides in satellite imagery, rather than the tens or hundreds of thousands they anticipated from the aftermaths of other large earthquakes in mountainous areas. “Something slightly mysterious has happened,” says David Petley, a geoscientist at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, UK. “The landslide problem is far from trivial, but it’s not as desperately serious as we might have feared.”

The most violent event occurred in the Langtang valley, a popular trekking area in the mountains north of Kathmandu. Part of a glacier above Langtang village broke off and plummeted into the valley below. Witnesses report a powerful wind blasting snow, dust and building fragments over the village, suggesting that the avalanche was so powerful that it sent a pressure wave racing outwards, says Dorothea Stumm, a glaciologist at the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development in Kathmandu. Satellite images reveal that a giant swathe of mountainside has been obliterated, right down to the river on the valley floor.

Elsewhere, Nepalese authorities worry that landslides might block rivers. This can form lakes that obstruct major roads, force people to evacuate their homes or even burst in a single catastrophic event. Last August, a landslide triggered by heavy rains dammed the Sun Kosi River in northern Nepal, killing roughly 150 people and causing widespread flooding.

At least four groups are using government and commercial satellite imagery to map such hazards. The recent quake caused landslides that blocked valleys, including several along the Trisuli River, which runs between Nepal and Tibet. “It looks to be quite risky there at the moment,” says Nick Rosser, a landslide expert at Durham University, UK. “This will be the area of biggest impact when the monsoon starts, as rainfall totals there are among some of the highest in the country.” In preparation, a team from the Chinese Academy of Sciences has been surveying landslide sites along roads that lead to Tibet. Another area of concern is a landslide-created lake on the Marshyangdi River, which runs above the Annapurna trekking circuit.

The monsoon in Nepal typically lasts from June to September, and fatal landslides happen mostly during that period. The amount of monsoon rainfall varies dramatically from year to year (D. N. Petley et al. Nat. Hazards 43, 23–44; 2007). The fact that the earthquake struck in April may have been something of a saving grace, because dry soils are harder to dislodge than is wet ground. Many more landslides would have happened had the quake struck just a few months later, says Binod Tiwari, a geotechnical engineer at California State University in Fullerton.

The country was at high risk of landslides even before the tremor. Nepal rides atop the ongoing collision between India and Asia, a geological bust-up that pushes the Himalayas to ever-greater heights. The rugged terrain, unstable soils, heavy rains and mountain communities combine to make it one of the world’s landslide hotspots.

The earthquake, now named the Gorkha quake, has worsened the situation. It ruptured the main Himalayan geological fault to the northwest of Kathmandu. By 11 May, more than 8,000 people had been confirmed dead — although that is many thousands fewer than experts had projected. Buildings in Kathmandu may have been sturdier than thought, or the ground may not have shaken quite as strongly as would be expected from the quake’s magnitude.

Gentler shaking would also help to explain the relative paucity of landslides, says Marin Clark, a geomorphologist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. “Either that, or the rocks are stronger than we estimated,” she says.

But the risk of landslides remains high. After the magnitude-7.6 Chi-chi earthquake in Taiwan in 1999 and the magnitude-7.9 Sichuan earthquake in mainland China in 2008, the number of landslides soared for years as sediment continued to shift in fresh debris flows (B. Yu et al. Eng. Geol. 182, 130–135; 2014). Authorities in Nepal need to prepare for the monsoon season by inspecting and monitoring the places most at risk, Rosser says. “That’s where we need to be focusing,” he says. “Places where we have landslides and there’s a population.”

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
521,
Pages:
133–134
Date published:
()
DOI:
doi:10.1038/521133a

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.