Nature | Trend Watch

Israel edges out South Korea for top spot in research investment

Two countries vie to invest more of their economy into research than anyone else.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

Israel has just nudged ahead of South Korea as the world’s most research-intensive economy, according to figures released on 7 February by the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Last year, the OECD reported that South Korea was opening up a clear lead — but its latest data, which reveal 2015 investments and make revisions to earlier years, suggest that the two countries are still neck and neck. In 2015, Israel invested 4.25% of its gross domestic product (GDP) in research and development (R&D), marginally more than South Korea, which dipped to 4.23%.

Source: OECD

In both countries, industry accounts for much R&D spending. When it comes to the intensity given to “basic” research — which the OECD defines as work undertaken primarily to acquire new knowledge without any particular application in view — South Korea holds a clear lead, with 0.73% of its economy invested in the practice, a larger proportion than anywhere else in the world. (Israel, with 0.39% investment in 2014, is ninth on this measure.)

China continues to divert more of its economic growth into research: by 2015 it had invested 2.07% of its GDP, and has a plan to reach 2.5% by 2020.

In OECD nations (which include Japan, the United States and Germany), the balance between government- and industry-financed R&D is slowly shifting. The fraction of R&D funded by domestic governments has been falling steadily since 2010, the OECD shows, dropping from 31% to 27% over 5 years. Industry-financed investment, which had dipped during the global financial crisis beginning in 2008, is back up to around 61% — aided by rising tax incentives for business R&D. Separately, cross-border research funding — not accounted for in the government and industry financing figures — is also on the rise.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21443

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.