Nature | Trend watch

Half of papers searched for online are free to read

Large study of open research analysed reader data from Unpaywall tool, which finds freely available versions of articles.

Corrected:

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

Almost half of the scholarly papers that people attempt to access online are now freely and legally available, according to a huge study that tracked 100,000 online requests for journal papers in June.

The work, published on 2 August in PeerJ Preprints1, examined reader data from a web-browser extension called Unpaywall, which trawls the Internet to find free-to-read versions of paywalled papers.

The tool, which launched in April, was developed by two authors of the study, Jason Priem and Heather Piwowar, who co-founded the non-profit company Impactstory in Vancouver, Canada. It has been installed by more than 80,000 people worldwide and is used around 50,000 times a day, says Priem.

When Unpaywall users land on a journal paper, the tool queries a database called oaDOI — also developed by the pair — that contains records of all 67 million journal articles with digital object identifiers (DOIs), an identifier code widely used for academic publications. The widget then signals to the user whether a free-to-read version of the article is available.

The study authors analysed server logs of 100,000 papers that Unpaywall users tried to access during one week in June, and found that 47% of accessed studies were legally available to read for free somewhere on the web. Around half the content being accessed was published in the past two years, says Priem.

The study, which hasn’t yet been peer-reviewed, is “careful and extensive”, says Ludo Waltman, deputy director of the Centre for Science and Technology Studies at Leiden University in the Netherlands who edits the Journal of Informetrics.

The study authors say theirs is the first broad analysis of the state of open research since a 2014 report produced for the European Commission. But the two analyses employed different methods: the earlier one used automated software to search online for papers drawn at random from the Scopus database. It also scoured social scholarly networks such as Academia.edu and ResearchGate — which the Unpaywall study does not examine — and estimated that, at the time, more than half of peer-reviewed research articles published from 2007–12 were free to read online. Given the methodological differences, that’s roughly comparable to the finding in the new work, Piwowar says. 

The latest work also delves into how papers become free to read. More than 20% of scholarly articles searched for through Unpaywall were available directly from journals, with clear licences describing whether the papers were free not just to read, but also to download or redistribute. Another 9% of the studies were still published behind a paywall, but authors later uploaded their paper — or some version of it, such as a peer-reviewed manuscript — to an online repository (see ‘The state of open research’).

Credit: H. Piwowar et al. Preprint at http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3119v1 (2017).

The most intriguing category of papers were the 15% that were posted on a publisher’s site as free to read, but without any explicit open licence. The authors say this type of open-access — which they call ‘bronze’, in contrast to the widely used ‘gold’ and ‘green’ definitions — has been scarcely discussed.

Citation complications

To measure the prevalence of free-to-read papers in the scholarly literature as a whole, the authors used oaDOI to identify the publication statuses of 100,000 articles chosen randomly from the 67 million journal articles available on the DOI registry Crossref. In this sample, 28% of articles were free-to-read, predicting a total of 19 million such articles in the literature. Of papers published in 2015 — the most recent year examined — 45% were freely available, which suggests that newer articles are more likely to be open.

The study also investigated the claim that open-access articles are more cited than paywalled studies. It analysed another random set of 100,000 papers from the 8 million indexed in the Web of Science database between 2009 and 2015, found that, for a given subject area and publication year, free-to-read articles are cited 18% more than the average.

The trend is supported by several previous studies2, but some have questioned whether the effect exists. Waltman says that it’s difficult to know for sure whether these studies are being cited more frequently specifically because they are open. To be certain, he says, one would need to check whether researchers citing the studies have access to paywalled content.

Priem says that one limitation of the study is that its samples included only articles with DOIs, which aren’t always used by publishers in the arts and humanities disciplines and in the developing world.

Still, “the percentage of literature that is OA continues to grow quite steadily”, he says. And that could have implications for academic libraries. As tensions over the costs of institutional subscription packages grow between universities and publishers, the finding that roughly half of recently published research may be available to read for free could “tip the scales toward cancellation for some institutions”, the study says.

To Priem, the future looks open. “In the next few decades, we’re going to be seeing nearly all the literature available freely.”

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2017.22418

Corrections

Corrected:

An earlier version of this story stated that free-to-read articles are cited 18% more than paywalled articles; in fact, the comparison is with the average for all articles for a given subject area and publication year.

References

  1. Piwowar, H. et al. Preprint at http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3119v1 (2017).

  2. Gargouri, Y. et al. PLoS ONE 5, e1363 (2010).

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments

Commenting is currently unavailable.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.