Nature | Breaking News

European medical research escapes stifling privacy laws

Proposed legislation had threatened the use of genomic and clinical data in medical studies.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

A threat to medical research projects in Europe has been averted. European Union politicians and officials agreed on 15 December to exempt research from some of the strict provisions in planned data-protection legislation.

“This is very positive for us – the biggest threats are over,” says Michaela Mayrhofer, senior project manager at the European Union's Biobanking and Biomolecular Research Infrastructure, which is building collections of billions of biological samples across Europe and is headquartered in Vienna, Austria.

The legislation, first proposed three years ago, is primarily intended to protect people from having their digital information exploited for commercial, or other, purposes. At first medical researchers viewed the proposed rules positively because they clarified procedures for sharing clinical and genomic data across European Union (EU) member states.

But earlier this year, the European Parliament added amendments that would have made it hard for scientists to efficiently use such data and link them to tissue samples.

Data unmasked

One amendment removed an exemption for researchers from a rule that all personal data remain anonymous in perpetuity. This would have created problems for scientists who need to unmask data in order to assess progression of diseases and long-term outcomes of treatments.

Another required researchers to obtain fresh consent from donors every time their data or tissues are used in a different study, something medical scientists say is unworkable.

But the compromise agreement between the parliament, the European Council and the European Commission now allows medical researchers to unmask data in special circumstances and to re-use an individual’s data and samples for multiple studies in different diseases, provided that person signs up to a general form of consent that covers all approved studies.

The agreement is expected to be rubber-stamped by the parliament’s civil liberties committee and by EU member states in the next few days.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2015.19054

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments

Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

Mythical beasts

science-myths

The science myths that will not die

False beliefs and wishful thinking about the human experience are common. They are hurting people — and holding back science.

People power

Nature10

Nature’s 10

Ten people in science who mattered in 2015.

New particle?

lhc-higgs

Hint of new boson at LHC sparks flood of papers

Almost 100 manuscripts have appeared on the preprint server in the wake of the recent announcement.

Genome-editing revolution

Doudna

Jennifer Doudna: My whirlwind year with CRISPR

Jennifer Doudna, a pioneer of the revolutionary genome-editing technology, reflects on how 2015 became the most intense year of her career — and what she's learnt.

Look ahead

2016

The science to look out for in 2016

Space missions, carbon capture and gravitational waves are set to shape the year.

Podcast Extra

cafe

The psychology of Star Wars

What can the world of Star Wars tell us about psychology? Travis Langley explains all in this Podcast Extra, using examples from his new book Star Wars Psychology: Dark Side of the Mind.

Know what's happening in science today

Newsletter

Sign up for our daily newsletter

The best science news from around the Web, direct to your inbox every day.

Science jobs from naturejobs