Nature | News

Europe's leaders slash proposed research budget

Heads of the 27 European Union governments want €10 billion in savings over 7 years.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

EU

European Commission President José Manuel Barroso, speaking at the European Council meeting where leaders called for cuts in the Union's research budget.

It is bad news for the massive research programme of the European Union (EU). In an acrimonious meeting of the European Council to decide the EU’s general budget for 2014–20, leaders of the union’s 27 member states slashed the €80 billion (US$108 billion) that the European Commission proposed for research in  in November 2011 back to €69.24 billion.

This is unlikely to be the last word on the fate of the seven-year research programme, known as Horizon 2020. The EU operates a complex decision-making system, and budgets must be agreed on by the council, the commission and the European Parliament. The parliament tends to be friendlier to research policies than the council — which gathers heads of government and tends to promote national interests. The parliament had earlier called for a mighty €100-billion budget for Horizon 2020.

But observers say that behind-the-scenes negotiations between the three bodies over the past months leave little room to hope that the parliament will be able to rescue the budget.

Horizon 2020 comprises a variety of research programmes, including the highly regarded — and highly competitive — European Research Council, which awards large grants to individual researchers exclusively on the basis of excellence. The commission is not commenting on how it might apportion the cuts among the programmes when the final budget is decided.

The council did, however, set aside exact budgets for three large scientific infrastructure programmes outside Horizon 2020. It approved €6.3 billion for Galileo, Europe’s navigation satellite system, down just 10% from the commission’s proposal. And it allocated €2.7 billion to the experimental nuclear-fusion reactor ITER, which the commission had originally proposed not funding. But it approved only €3.8 billion for the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security system of Earth-observation satellites, for which the commission had requested €5.84 billion.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2013.12403

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments

Commenting is currently unavailable.

Gene-edited embryos

crispr-embryo

CRISPR fixes disease gene in viable human embryos

Gene-editing experiment pushes scientific and ethical boundaries.

The best science news from Nature and beyond, direct to your inbox every day.

Transgenic salmon

gm-salmon

First genetically engineered salmon sold in Canada

US firm AquaBounty Technologies says that its transgenic fish has hit the market after a 25-year wait.

Galactic map

cosmic-map

Cosmic map reveals a not-so-lumpy Universe

Odd results could still be consistent with the ‘standard model’ of cosmology.

Open research

open-access

Half of papers searched for online are free to read

Large study of open research analysed reader data from Unpaywall tool, which finds freely available versions of articles.

Gene-editing retraction

ngago-retraction

Authors retract controversial NgAgo gene-editing study

Researchers pull study after several failed attempts by others to replicate findings describing a proposed alternative to CRISPR.

Nature Podcast

new-pod-red

Listen

This week, the first flower, gene editing human embryos, and the antimatter quest.