Nature | Trend watch

Ebola funding surge hides falling investment in other neglected diseases

Global research funds for these illnesses are at their lowest levels for a decade, when cash for West Africa epidemic is excluded.

Corrected:

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

John Moore/Getty Images

Ebola vaccine development attracted more than 60% of funding for the disease in 2015.

Global funding for research on neglected diseases — which include tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and malaria — is at its lowest level since 2007, according to the annual G-FINDER investment report by Policy Cures Research, a health-policy analysis firm in Sydney, Australia.
 
But that total — just over US$3 billion for 2015, the latest year for which figures are available — does not include a rapid burst of funding for research into Ebola to tackle the outbreak in West Africa. Investments in Ebola and other African viral haemorrhagic fevers shot up to $631 million in 2015 — more than was spent on any other neglected disease except HIV/AIDS (see 'Two sides of the same coin').
 
Almost two-thirds of funds invested in Ebola was spent on developing preventive vaccines, and more than one-third of funding came from industry. That is an unusually high proportion, notes Nick Chapman, executive director of Policy Cures Research.

Source: Policy Cures/G-FINDER 2016

The firm decided to count the Ebola investments separately from the bulk of neglected-disease funding, because of their distorting effect on the underlying figures. “At the same time that we’re seeing this huge explosion in Ebola funding, governments are letting funding slide for neglected diseases,” Chapman says.

Public funding falls

The G-FINDER analysis, or Global Funding of Innovation for Neglected Diseases, tracks public, private and philanthropic investment into illnesses that disproportionately affect people in developing countries, and that don't have enough of a commercial market to attract much private research and development (R&D).

The steady drop in cash for diseases other than Ebola, the report finds, is caused almost entirely by a fall in public funds from high-income countries, such as the United States.

These countries accounted for 97% of the $1.9 billion in public funds for R&D in 2015. Much of the US money was delivered through grants from the country’s National Institutes of Health, meaning that neglected disease R&D is vulnerable to funding changes at the agency.

Philanthropic funding also fell slightly. It comes from two main donors — the Wellcome Trust in London and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in Seattle, Washington, which together accounted for $610 million out of $645 million in public funds in 2015. The Wellcome Trust cut its investment by $27 million — or 22% — from 2014 to 2015; its funding for neglected diseases has fallen by 33% since 2012.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21505
  • Additional reporting by Richard van Noorden and Nisha Gaind.

Corrections

Corrected:

The story originally said that the G-FINDER analysis was carried out by Policy Cures. In fact, it is now carried out by Policy Cures Research.

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.