Nature | News

Earth-sized planet around nearby star is astronomy dream come true

Planet orbiting Proxima Centauri is likely to be the focus of future interstellar voyages.

Corrected:

Article tools

Ricardo Ramirez

The newly discovered planet orbits Proxima Centauri every 11.2 days.

Proxima Centauri, the star closest to the Sun, has an Earth-sized planet orbiting it at the right distance for liquid water to exist. The discovery, reported today in Nature1, fulfils a longstanding dream of science-fiction writers — a potentially habitable world that is close enough for humans to send their first interstellar spacecraft.

“The search for life starts now,” says Guillem Anglada-Escudé, an astronomer at Queen Mary University of London and leader of the team that made the discovery.

Humanity’s first chance to explore this nearby world may come from the recently announced Breakthrough Starshot initiative, which plans to build fleets of tiny laser-propelled interstellar probes in the coming decades. Travelling at 20% of the speed of light, they would take about 20 years to cover the 1.3 parsecs from Earth to Proxima Centauri.

LISTEN

How a science-fiction story about our nearest neighbour became a reality

You may need a more recent browser or to install the latest version of the Adobe Flash Plugin.

Proxima’s planet is at least 1.3 times the mass of Earth. The planet orbits its red-dwarf star — much smaller and dimmer than the Sun — every 11.2 days. “If you tried to pick the type of planet you’d most want around the type of star you’d most want, it would be this,” says David Kipping, an astronomer at Columbia University in New York City. “It’s thrilling.”

Earlier studies had hinted at the existence of a planet around Proxima. Starting in 2000, a spectrograph at the European Southern Observatory (ESO) in Chile looked for shifts in starlight caused by the gravitational tug of an orbiting planet. The resulting measurements suggested that something was happening to the star every 11.2 days. But astronomers could not rule out whether the signal was caused by an orbiting planet or another type of activity, such as stellar flares.

Star and planet align

In January 2016, Anglada-Escudé and his colleagues launched a campaign to nail down the suspected Proxima planet. ESO granted their request to observe using a second planet-hunting instrument, on a different telescope, for 20 minutes almost every night between 19 January and 31 March. “As soon as we had 10 nights it was obvious,” Anglada-Escudé says.

The team dubbed the work the ‘pale red dot’ campaign, after the famous 'pale blue dot' photograph taken of Earth by the Voyager 1 spacecraft in 1990. Because Proxima is a red-dwarf star, the planet would appear reddish or orangeish, perhaps bathed in light similar to the warm evening tints of Earth.

The exoplanet next door

NOTE This video contains an error. At 0:54 an animation representing the radial velocity method for finding exoplanets is incorrect. Here is a link to a correct representation https://www.eso.org/public/unitedkingdom/videos/eso1035g/

Although the planet orbits at a distance that would permit liquid water, other factors might render it unlivable. It might be tidally locked — meaning that the same hemisphere always faces the star, which scorches one side of the planet while the other remains cool. The active star might occasionally zap the planet with destructive X-ray flares. And it's unclear whether the planet has a protective, life-friendly atmosphere.

Proxima itself belongs to the triple-star system Alpha Centauri. In 2012, a Nature paper reported that an Earth-mass planet orbited another member of that stellar trio, Alpha Centauri B2. That result has now mostly been dismissed3, 4, but exoplanet specialists say the Proxima claim is more likely to hold up.

“People call me Mr Sceptical, and I think this result is more robust,” says Artie Hatzes, an astronomer at the Thuringian State Observatory in Tautenburg, Germany.

False alarm

This time, the combination of new observations and older measurements dating back to 2000 increases confidence in the finding, Anglada-Escudé’s team argues. “It’s stayed there robustly in phase and amplitude over a very long time,” says team member Michael Endl, an astronomer at the University of Texas at Austin. “That’s a telltale sign of a planet.” The data even contain hints that a second planet may exist, orbiting Proxima somewhere between every 100 and 400 days.

The researchers now hope to learn whether the Proxima planet's pass across the face of its star can be seen from Earth. The chances are low, but such a ‘transit’ could reveal details of the planet, such as whether it has an atmosphere. A team led by Kipping has been independently looking for transits around Proxima, and is frantically crunching its data in search of any signal.

The discovery of the Proxima planet comes at a time of growing scientific interest in small planets around dwarf stars, says Steinn Sigurdsson, an astrophysicist at Pennsylvania State University in University Park. NASA’s Kepler space telescope has shown that rocky planets are common around such stars, which themselves are the most common type of star in the Galaxy. “This is a total vindication of that strategy,” he says.

One day, the Proxima planet might be seen as the birth of a new stage in planetary research. “It gives us the target and focus to build the next generation of telescopes and one day maybe even get to visit,” says Kipping. “It's exactly what we need to take exoplanetary science to the next level.”

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
536,
Pages:
381–382
Date published:
()
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20445

Corrections

Corrected:

The video accompanying this story contains an error. At 0:54 an animation representing the radial velocity method for finding exoplanets is incorrect. Here is a link to a correct representation https://www.eso.org/public/unitedkingdom/videos/eso1035g/

References

  1. Anglada-Escudé, G. et al. Nature 536, 437440 (2016).

  2. Dumusque, X. et al. Nature 491, 207211 (2012).

  3. Hatzes, A. P. Astrophys. J. 770, 133 (2013).

  4. Rajpaul, V., Aigrain, S. & Roberts, S. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 456, L6L10 (2016).

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments

15 comments Subscribe to comments

  1. Avatar for Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    "Physics stands on the strong base of the facts, but not on drift sand of imaginary hypotheses" — E. Rutherford. Dear Ernest Rutherford's saying arose from difficult research experiences of radioactivity which had gave in the physicist's hands the most exact tool for an atom preparation – α-particles (twice ionized cores of helium He+2) which were bombarded thin plates of metals and studied paths of α-particles after interaction with a thin plate. Some of α-particles flew away without changing original direction, others deviated on different angles and quite seldom α-particles recoiled from a thin plate as though it was a monolith. It means there was a direct hit in a target core substance . Nearly four years were required to E. Rutherford to discover the atomic nucleus size (3х10↑12 cm) and the size of atom which was four orders of magnitude more than the core. Not by tip of a pen or computer simulation, but with long experience, wearisome experiments and observations, E. Rutherford received the major truth. Tesla also !! Here, the main interaction happens between electrons of an accelerated bundle and metal electrons. Other interactions are four orders magnitude rare and aren't defining. Specified interaction is a sharp braking of electrons of a bundle and a sharp acceleration of electrons of metal. There are practically no other acts. Two electrons face different speeds. Collision turns out to be elastic, as having the same charges, in case of their approximation at distance equal to diameter of an electron, there is working Coulomb force of repulsion Fc= e·e / (2·r)↑2 where е = 1,6 x 10↑-19 C — an electron charge; r — electron radius; 2·r — distance between centers attractions of two electron spheres 2· 2,82 x 10↑-15 m = 5,64 x 10↑-15m. Having these data, we will get Coulomb repulsion force Fc= (1,6 x 10↑-19)↑2 / (2·r)↑2 = 2,56 x 10↑-38 / 3,18 x 10↑-29 = 8,04 x 10↑-10 N Such is repulsion force between electrons. !! Now we need define inertial force when braking of an accelerated electron: m = 9,1 x 10↑-31 kg is mass of an electron Ve = electron speed = 0,5 C where C is light velocity 3 x 10↑8 m/s (photon velocity in free space); dt is braking time. For determination of dt we need to take a distance of braking electron, equal S = 10·r which passes this distance at average speedf of Vavr = 0,5 · C / 2 = 0,25 · C. C is light velocity. We get dt = S / Vavr = 5,64 x 10↑-14m / 0,25 C = 7,52 x 10↑-22 s. Now find acceleration a = dV/ dt = (0,5·3 x 10↑8 m/s) / 7,52 x 10↑-22s = 0,2 x 10↑30 m/s↑2 And the inertial force acting on an electron will be: F = m·a = 9,1 x 10↑-31kg · 0,2 x 10↑30 m/s↑2 = 1,8 x 10↑-1 N. (0,18N) It is a very-very big force. The principal error here is acceleration determination. Let braking of electron going on a section not 10·r but 100·r, then we get dt = dt = S / Vavr = 5,64 x 10↑-13m / 0,25 C = 7,52 x 10↑-21 s. Acceleration and all remaining will decrease by factor F = m·a = 1,8 x 10↑-2 N. (0,018N) And only if braking electron happens at distance 10↑7·r, then braking force is comparable to Coulomb repulsion force, in case of interaction at distance 2·r. F = m·a = 1,8 x 10↑-7 N. (0,000000018N) And how strong will Coulomb repulsion forces at distance 10↑7·r ?? Fc= e·e / (10↑7·r)↑2 Fc= (1,6 x 10↑-19)↑2 / (10↑7·r)↑2 = 2,56 x 10↑-38 / (10↑7· 2,82 x 10↑-15)↑2 = 3,2 x 10↑-23 N Having these data, we get 3,2 x 10↑-23 N / 1,8 x 10↑-7 N = 1,8 x 10↑-16 It is 16 orders of magnitude less. It means that an accelerated electron, having inertial force many orders bigger, will overcome Coulomb repulsion force and with giant force will hit an electron in thin metal plates. Let now calculate the pressure of this force of F = 1,8x10↑-7 N on an electron. If A= (4/3)·π·( 2,82 x 10↑-15 m)↑2 is area of a big circle of electron (cross-section) = 0,33 x 10↑-30 m2 , then the pressure will be P = F/A = 1,8 x10↑-7 N / 0,33 x 10↑-30 m2 = 5,4 x 10↑21 N/m↑2 = 5,51 x 10↑17 t/m↑2. (tonne per square metre). 1t = 9806.65 N Or 5,51 x 10↑13 t/cm↑2 55,1 billion tonnes per square centimetre. Such a huge pressure in our macrocosm can't be realized, it is so giant huge. Now it is easy understanding that the main defining force in the course of generation of X-ray radiation is inertial force of the accelerated electrons for which Coulomb repulsion forces have sixteen order of magnitude smallness. Electrons of an accelerated bundle of a X-ray tube literally rush into electronic tank of an anti anode, break off its electrons on basic elements and give them a speeds from super luminous till speed of light. On that way X-ray electromagnetic field is created. As an electron contains two sorts of matter - electrical matter (photons) and magnetic matter (dipole matter), in X-rays these particles are present at corresponding proportions. So these particles which are beaten out from metal plate electrons in case of their collision at super luminous speeds are main structural particles of electromagnetic fields. These particles having weight, bear forces of fields. They are matter because only the matter can bear a force and their derivations - force fields are simple clusters of these particles in corresponding proportions. So really going this process and genius Tesla is a master №1 of smashing electroons ! ps: Saga will continue !!
  2. Avatar for Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    Sensational NASA Empiricism Enlightenment NASA disproved Einstain's relativity finally! Thanks NASA! I wanted not to touch an electronics engineering any more, but again there was experimental fact indicating that in an electronics engineering they do not understand what they have created. Sensation — not for me. The matter is that it is one of the major modern sciences represents a set of technological instructions on creation of ultra high frequency microwave vacuum electron devices — clear the empiricist. Main rule of any technological science is: "Do as it is specified — you will get the necessary result." In such science there are practically no questions: "Why?... How?" Because on them the correct answers are unknown. One of such questions is the question about the rate of propagation of radio emissions.!! Their, all the time called electromagnetic, but slowly began to comprehend that it not so. At first , they allocated from it a magnetic component, and, without having understood that they have created, have began to call it the "torsion radiation" or "torsion field", and then, here and there began to guess that all radio communication works only at an electric component (photon radiation), of an initial electromagnetic radiation, vaguely suspecting that electromagnetic radiations live not long. At the same time, continuing to believe lier Einstain that radio emission speed is same, as at light. So it is difficult to blame technicians that they forgot about the law of philosophy which name — transition of quantity to quality. Prosaicness of consciousness of people, limited to a professional framework which heavy chains kowtows to the person is shown, depriving of a view of a celestial scope, depriving of the free flight of relaxed thought. And the made mention law of transition of quantity to quality says that the photon having the speed of 300 000 km/s is perceived as the light when its speed decreases, it already proves as a thermal radiation and if still continue to reduce its speed, then it is radio radiation at which rate of propagation is obliged to be lower than speed of the ligh. This philosophical concept at last received the experimental confirmation. The NASA space experiment with successful disembarkation to the planet Mars, research frame station helped to check this situation. There were disclosed important data on experiment in the USA about time of passing radio signal from NASA reasearch frame station at Mars till the Johnson Space Center mission control in Houston and shed a light about real measured speed. Well it turned out that visible light from the Mars (distance to the Earth — 55,76•10↑6 km) to Earth goes as and it is necessary to it, 3 minutes, and radio signal passes this distance in 16 minutes. Then this information was quickly closed by NASA. At the first moment, for pleasure of safe disembarkation of the scientific module on Mars, heads and performers for larger reliability of result gave out all objective informations about operation of the module on Mars slightly more. Then, someone from NASA relativists chiefs came round that there is a contradiction to the official Main Stream Science, and soon CIA has covered all this informations in MSM. But as in Russia said: "The word is not a sparrow, once you will let out, you will not catch agin". Einstain's NASA relativists hide real informations because they are afraid of the truth. Such is a pseudo science in fact. But to us it is necessary, however, and at last to find a Truth and, we will receive it. Really, at the time of disembarkation to the Mars, NASA scientific frame station, the distance between the Earth and Mars was 158 million km. (158•10↑6 km), and radio signals overcame this distance in 16 minutes (960 seconds), or in other words they have had a speed: V=16 • 10↑6km/960sec. ≈164•10↑3 km/s. It is almost twice less than light velocity (300 • 10↑3km/s). From these data it is possible and valuable for us to determine anode accelerating voltage of the transmitter from NASA scientific frame station at Mars. This voltage can be found from the well known formula from electronics engineering: V=5,95 • 10↑5√U. This experimental formula show the rate of propagation of corpuscular kinetic fields by accelerating tension in the first approximation. So √U = V/5,95 10↑5=164•10↑6 (m/s)/5,95 10↑5=270, U≈73 kV. What tells us this experimental fact about? Tell this: Everything, so-called "electromagnetic" radiations have the corpuscular, but not the wave nature. Rate of propagation of corpuscular kinetic fields is defined by the accelerating voltage (tension) and at first approximation, can be found from the well known formula in electronics engineering: V=5,95 • 10↑5√U. These, Corpuscular Kinetic Fields take place in nature as magnetic fields and electric fileds, and their intrinsic components (dipole magnetic particles) and photons (electric particles) are contained in electron's structure. The electron is the shell-less structure and containing ≈3•10↑10 photons and dipole magnetic particles which were knocked out from it by inertial forces of microwave vacuum electron devices. The mass of these particles and the approximate sizes are specified. In the Mother nature there is no "indivisible" electron.!! Existing electro-magnetic dynamics are not true. !! ps: Saga will continue !! ... pps: "Physics stands on a stable foundation of the facts, but not on drift sand of imaginary hypotheses", E. Rutherford.
  3. Avatar for Robert Buntrock
    Robert Buntrock
    A manned voyage to the Alpha Centauri system was described in the novel, The Sparrow, 15-20 years ago.
  4. Avatar for David Lea-Smith
    David Lea-Smith
    'Proxima itself belongs to the triple-star system Alpha Centauri. In 2012, a Nature paper reported that an Earth-mass planet orbited another member of that stellar trio, Alpha Centauri B. That result has now mostly been dismissed, but exoplanet specialists say the Proxima claim is more likely to hold up.' I had a look a the Nature article and noticed that Nature has not retracted this article or written an 'expression of concern' piece on it. Any plans to do so?
  5. Avatar for Michael Chisnall
    Michael Chisnall
    The video contains an error. At around the one minute mark it demonstrates the doppler method by showing the star and the planet on the same side of the barycentre when the star should be on the opposite side to the planet.
  6. Avatar for Nature Web Admin
    Nature Web Admin
    Thank you for bringing this to our attention, you are absolutely right. We have now flagged the error in the video.
  7. Avatar for Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    I have decided to give a little help scientists whos mind is occupied with space drives , especially E-DRIVE and similar projects. Make a more research about ECS effect or Effect of the Cavity Structures like Victor Stepanovich Grebennikov called it before 30 years when he had discovered effect. https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwizpInyy9vOAhWGiSwKHQJzB5MQuAIIKTAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D8SA5lgmZ7Zo&usg=AFQjCNE83pHKN47zGJf87mT3GsLcMEdu7g&bvm=bv.130731782,d.bGg EPS can make a things to Levitate and can give very-very high acceleration force,. For Levitaion you need to treat an object (for example space ship ) with extremely high microway freq, using only cavity wave guide structures like a source of these very high impulse kinetic fields which are of course material in nature. Power in form of VERY HIGH DENSITY KINETIK FIELDS of these AETHERIC PARTICLES comes from direct conversion of these sub-sub material aetheric particles from the very fine Intrinsic Structure of ELECTRON to low radiation kinetik fileds aetheric particles. Call it at one name AETHERIC particles. Yes they are trapped in the ELECTRON CAVITY structure and make outer shell of ELECTRON and many levels of sub shells deep inside matter structure of an electron. There are exist 18 inner structural symmetries formed similar Beautiful Russian Matrеshka -wooden doll with successively smaller ones fitted into bigger one). → Power comes in our space from very fine radiation particles from 18 intrinsic levels. It means there is a direct conversion of very high radiation octaves to the very low radiation octave (OCTAVE CONVERSION), with comple change of inner structure lattice.This low radiation octave for the matter in our 3.00016-D space lies in range from several THz up PHz.. People keep in mind that an electron has fantastic huge inner density of 15 000 tons/cm3. Why ?? Can you guess ?? The Forces of inertia are so huge thet nobody can imagine it. More cleary will be when you watch and carefully analyse these powerful experiments listed below. I think it will help a lot. Now you know where you need to dig for FREE ENERGY and SPACE DRIVES !! Thank you for good time and attention. VOLHV. 1.wmv https://yadi.sk/i/HdWroWncdhaSf 2.wmv https://yadi.sk/i/r_IkJ45_dhaQD 3.wmv https://yadi.sk/i/11jThrHwdhaUF 4.wmv https://yadi.sk/i/y10Q0-pGqHBA6 5.wmv https://yadi.sk/i/N51nZbtPdhacD 6.wmv https://yadi.sk/i/BiYZ9sCmdhaWw 7.wmv https://yadi.sk/i/M5wWAEOedhaXL 8.wmv https://yadi.sk/i/sd_gHBZTdhaXN 9.flv https://yadi.sk/i/OxhUHZOzdhaaB 10.flv https://yadi.sk/i/34l6rC3MdhaZi 10а.flv https://yadi.sk/i/gPjisypCdhagR 11.flv https://yadi.sk/i/tOS3zUMCgyeaE 12.flv https://yadi.sk/i/kjcTRo-Jdhabi
  8. Avatar for Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    On the whole i have decided to give you information about closest HUMAN BLOOD TIES PLANETS All distances are measured and given in Star units. 1 Star unit or "1 Дальняя даль" in Russian sanskrit is approximately 1.4 light years or 518 074 264 845,5 km. CARNA PLANET is the first habitable planet counting from the the Midgard planet, in the close proximity of the Proxima Centauri. Distance is 3 Star units or 4.2 light years. GELAGARD PLANET is the second human habitable planet and lies in orbit of proximity red dwarf Barnard in the constellation of Ophiuchus. Distance till Midgard planet from this planet is 4,5 Star units or 6.3 light years. DOLA PLANET is a 3rd human habitable planet in the vicinity of Star Sirius in Alpha Canis Majoris constellation. Very beautiful and rich planet. Center of celular schooling, science and cosmic technology. Language is Russian sanskrit. Distance is 6.2 Star units or 8,6798 light years. NESRECHA PLANET is an ugly deserted and sultry planet. It is a last planet with her 3 moons at the orbit of Procyon star, in the constellation Canis Minor. Very poorly inhibited but serve mainly as war depo and warehouse of Federation Celestial Troops. Distance from Midgard planet is 8,1575 Star units or 11,4205 light years. URAI PLANET In vicinty of Altair the main star of the Eagle constalation (Aplha Aquilae) lies this human race planet known as URAI earth. Main Megalopolis here is ASGARD CELESTIAL - full name, shortly ASGARD. ASGARD is a Main Star Trade Center in this part of our Galaxy. Language is Russian sanskrit. ASGARD have Celestial Circle portals. It means it have 16 Celestial portals ( on Midgard earth known as "Star Gates".). These 16 portals are connected with central planets of every of 16 constalations in our Milky-way Galaxy. Keep in mind total number of Constalations according to habitants of these constalations is 16 not 12, as on the Midgard earth accout. These 16 constalations are known as SVAEROG CIRCLE. ASGARD is also center of Milky-way Federation Celestial Troops Headquarter (Cosmic army forces from many joined friendly civilizations). On this planet can be seen lot of representatives of many different not humanoi friendly races. INGARD PLANET or DZIVA PLANET Planet DZIVA as habitants usualy call her is a real TWIN SYSTER of our MIDGARD planet. SHE IS WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING FOR!!, and she lies in vicinity of Chara star. Chara is located in the constellation of Canes Venatici. Planet DZIVA is habitable by WHITE HUMAN RACE from many human's planets near the center of Milky-way Galaxy and many others. Language in this civilization is of course OLD RUSSIAN Sanscrit. Distance from the DZIVA planet to MIDGARD earth is not 27.3 light years as earth's astronomy calculated but exactly at 26.6 light years. This was meassured distance with star ships. INGARD is cosmic name of this planet while DZIVA is a simpe favorite domestic name called by planet's habitants. FINISTA PLANET in FINISTA CONSTELATION This 6th planet has a name FINISTA and belong to the same name FINISTA constellation - NOT @Reticulum@ like it was known onf Midgard earth (enemy disinformation). FINISTA is an original native name of booth - planet and mother constellation. Finista is 3nd planet of ZETA2 star. Zets2 is very similar to our Sun and with all his planets ZETA2 star is a unique brother of our Solar system. Distance from FINISTA to Midgar earth is exactly 27 Star units or 37.8 light years. This planet very beautiful and unique in Universe. Some time ago Finista had been in enemy (non humanoid) possession but now is fully liberated and habitable with human beings. There are many Federation Celestial Troops bases. Original name FINISTA means CLEAR HAWK. ................................ ps: I have already sent many information in EOS search-team so i hope they will give all of us GOOD NEWS in relatively closer future. Yes official discovery, validation and presentation of new human habitable planets at short distance up to 40 light years from our Midgar planet !!. Yes my dear people, there are many things in closest Universe which need to be disclosed to 4 human races at Midgard planet in the very nearest Future. Shortly our Ancestors come back to MIDGARD !! With best wishes to all humans (only humans :) VOLHV
  9. Avatar for Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    Let's hear my story !! My name and nick name are not of any impotance to anybody - but shortly. I am a Russain VOLHV. Looking from the perspective of ancient civilizations THE VOLHV is a HUMAN BEING which know many secrets of Universe and Life - and not only our Universe. Ok now. I will give you very IMPORTANT information about multiple exoplanets on relative shortly distances up to 40 light years from the earth. I know you are looking for “Earth-like” exoplants so I will tell you that exist one very very special exoplanet which is exactly twin syster of our planet. Yes almost like our MIDGARD planet. "Midgard" is Cosmic name of our planet. So the EARTH is not a name but only general classification of any habitable planet - not strictly humanoidla type. Ok name of twin syster of our Midgard planet is INGARD planet.This name had gave very long time ago her native habitants.Yes they are human just like we are and some 650 000 years ago many human beings had came from THE INGARD planet to our MIDGARD planet - and they are still living here.They are our ancestors. But it is another story. Now come back to habitable zone in close proximity of the Proxima Centauri. Very precise meassured distance till Proxima Centauri is exaclty 4.2 light years. This is meassured distance with space ship from MIDGARD till corona layer of Proxima Centauri, I intentionaly havent gave you distance in real star distance units known in Universe as "ДАЛЬ ДАЛЬНЯЯ" because you does not know anything about space ships long distance meassurements, "ДАЛЬ ДАЛЬНЯЯ" can be translated as main Star Distance Unit not like you use "light year". So 1 Star Unit "ДАЛЬ ДАЛЬНЯЯ" distance is exacly 13,245....х 10e12 km. Now abou the planet around Proxima Centauri. The name of the planet is CARNA and correct distance from our planet is exaclty 3 Star Units or 3 "ДАЛЬ ДАЛЬНЯЯ". Plant axis of CARNAis is inclined to the Proxima Centauri. Planet was habitable with WHITE HUMAN RACE. Only difference to our civilization at the first glance is COSMIC LEVEL of CIVILIZATION. Very high level of knowledge and technolgy. The native language on CARNA is Old Sanscrit, very very similar to OLD RUSSIAN language. Old Russian is still in use in Northern parts of Russian federation. But only on Northern parts. So knowing old Russian language you can freely communicate with the habitants of CARNA planet. What is very interesting CARNA planet has two beautiful moons. Planet is very beautiful especialy at sunset time of Proxima Centauri. Looking from the surface you can see beautiful BLUE SUNSET. Yes on the contrary from our Sun which sunset is RED or even claret-coloured in very cold winter days. The atmosphere is very clean and sharp for breathing similar to atmosphere on Midgard earth after strong lighting stroms and heavy rains. The planet CARNA have a lot of fresh wather with many lakes and rivers. Planet havent open oceans but many indpendent seas. The human population on CARNA is very big. Well i dont know does you want to tell you more obout CARNA planet and her two moons or you want to know which are next planets habited with human population at relative short distance up to 40 light years from Midgard planet. If i tell you i will tell you only about beautiful things in closer universe not ugly thigs like 3rd Stellar War in "Milky Way". Best regards. VOLHV
  10. Avatar for Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    Enjoykin2017 Volhv
    Hello Alexandra and all people here !!
  11. Avatar for Louis Oldershaw
    Louis Oldershaw
    Well Ron, you might want to compare the cost of sending an unmanned mini-satellite to Proxima Centauri with the cost of one stealth bomber or one of the newest fighter jets so as to get a better feel for that "reality" you speak of. Exploration is part of human nature, and if you are looking for waste of taxpayer money, the science budget is not good hunting ground since it relatively small and worth it for the most part.
  12. Avatar for Ronald Schleyer
    Ronald Schleyer
    Debt is debt, jack, unless you are obtuse or insane.
  13. Avatar for Ronald Schleyer
    Ronald Schleyer
    “Only” twenty percent the speed of light! Sixty thousand kilometers per second! If such a probe hits the slightest sand grain in the depths of space, even a dust particle, it could be damaged or destroyed. The very idea of spending billions to develop “probes” for interstellar travel is a form of scientific sickness or fraud, another excuse for ripping off taxpayers to produce rafts of meaningless Ph.D. theses at ivy-league schools. ‘Nature’ magazine’s editors and this Witze character need to fold their tents and return to reality.
  14. Avatar for Georg R
    Georg R
    Food for thought: "The U.S. war in Iraq has cost $1.7 trillion with an additional $490 billion in benefits owed to war veterans, expenses that could grow to more than $6 trillion over the next four decades". Let this go through your head....$6 TRILLION. And this is just one random war. A proposed mission to Alpha Centauri, "Breakthrough Starshot" is projected to cost $15-$20B, a number which looks like a joke in comparison. If we wouldn't waste money ALL THE TIME (and I assume you have not the slightest idea on what things money is actually wasted), we would probably already have second homes on Proxima b right now. Right now, we don't even have a functioning Space Shuttle. I am tending to think that people like you don't actually "rationally" argue (because you would have to ignore the billions of $ we do in fact waste constantly on other things, from presidential vacations to whatnot), but that you have an anti-science stance for another reason and that the "money/tax" issue you mention is just to make it look more legit.
  15. Avatar for Heidi Uri
    Heidi Uri
    I understand your concern about people from here visiting your home planet with all the wars around here and everything. Still, you must have quite an advantage over us technologically, no? I'm sure your relatives there will be just fine.

Antivenom anxiety

snakebite

Vipers, mambas and taipans: the escalating health crisis over snakebites

Snakes kill tens of thousands of people each year. But experts can't agree on how best to overcome a desperate shortage of antivenom.

Newsletter

The best science news from Nature and beyond, direct to your inbox every day.

Alzheimer’s hope

Alzheimers

Alzheimer’s treatment appears to alleviate memory loss in small trial

Larger studies are under way to test whether the promising early data holds up.

Long-term memory

dna-data

How DNA could store all the world’s data

Modern archiving technology cannot keep up with the growing tsunami of bits. But nature may hold an answer to that problem already.

Mistaken identity

cell-line

Venerable brain-cancer cell line faces identity crisis

Samples of the cell line do not match its 50-year-old source ― but how the mix-up occurred is a mystery.

Opinion

misconduct

Stop ignoring misconduct

Efforts to reduce irreproducibility in research must also tackle the temptation to cheat.

Nature Podcast

new-pod-red

Listen

This week, famous hominin Lucy may have died when she fell from a tree, and an antibody-based drug shows promise in Alzheimer’s.