Nature | News Feature

Deep-sea research: Dive master

The US flagship submersible Alvin is getting a partial upgrade. But deep-sea exploration faces some rough water.

Corrected:

Article tools

L. Wills/WHOI

The Alvin submersible was taken out of service for upgrades in 2010 and will dive again next year.

At an industrial hangar in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, a plush toy dog stands guard next to a 5-tonne titanium sphere. Polished to a high shine, the 2.2-metre orb reflects the lights overhead and the faces of passing scientists, who come to ogle the US$11-million engineering marvel — a container strong enough to ferry researchers 6,500 metres down to the bottom of the ocean.

The sphere will be the new heart of the Alvin submersible, the United States’ workhorse in the deep sea. Over its five-decade career, Alvin has dived to the sea floor more than any other research submersible and has made some of the most important oceanographic discoveries of the past few generations. But in the past few years, it has been showing its age, and other countries have surged past with vehicles that can venture far deeper than Alvin’s current limit of 4,500 metres. In 2010, Alvin’s caretakers at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) took the venerable submersible out of commission for a $40-million redesign.

The massive upgrade was a long time coming. “I started here in 1996 and there was talk about building a new sub then,” says Bruce Strickrott, an Alvin pilot and expedition leader at WHOI, who is managing the sub’s reconstruction.

This month, Strickrott and his crew will start to rebuild the sub around the passenger sphere, readying it for a series of final tests off the coast of Bermuda by March. Assuming it passes, Alvin will resume a full schedule of scientific dives, joining a suite of tools that are giving US researchers unprecedented ways to study the deep sea — from manned subs like Alvin to remotely controlled robots and autonomous mappers.

But after celebrating the revamped sub’s maiden voyage, researchers will wake up to some sobering realities. Budget problems have constrained the current Alvin upgrade, so researchers must wait for the completion of a second construction phase, in 3–5 years, before they can take advantage of the greater depth limit allowed by the new sphere. That leaves the United States well behind France, Russia, Japan and now China, which sent its research submersible below 7,000 metres in June. And as wealthy entrepreneurs such as film director James Cameron capture public attention with dives in privately built subs, the United States is making painful cuts to many of its deep-sea assets. The administration of President Barack Obama is proposing to cut off funding next year for a pair of manned submersibles in Hawaii that can dive to 2,000 metres.

“America has one submersible capable of reaching Titanic-ish depths — in the couple-of-miles range — which these days isn’t that deep,” says Cameron. “What is the future of deep submergence research?”

Mark Thiessen/National Geographic

Q&A: James Cameron talks about deep-sea research.

That future once looked boundless. On 17 February 1977, Alvin skimmed along the ocean bottom about 400 kilometres northeast of the Galapagos Islands. Days before, sensors towed by a ship had identified a spike in water temperatures near the sea floor. Alvin explored the region and brought researchers face to face, for the first time, with hydrothermal vents, fissures in the sea floor that spew streams of warm, shimmering brine into the near-freezing water. In what was supposed to be a barren desert at the ocean bottom — far from the reaches of life-powering sunlight — Alvin revealed oases of clams, crabs, shrimp and alien-like white tube worms crowned with crimson tops.

Two years after the Galapagos dives, an Alvin expedition witnessed a more violent scene: jets of black fluids, superheated to 400 °C, shooting out of gigantic chimneys of rock, which were dubbed black smokers. Later, in the geologically quieter Gulf of Mexico, Alvin found vents that were releasing cooler methane-rich fluids. These ‘cold seeps’ also support communities of animals, including slow-growing tube worms thought to be hundreds of years old — some of the most ancient creatures alive on the planet. The discovery of such ecosystems, powered by microbes that harness chemical energy from vent waters, raised questions about where life originated on Earth and where it may reside on other worlds.

Alvin’s string of accomplishments silenced early critics — some of the top geoscientists of the 1960s and 1970s — who initially regarded the submersible as little more than a toy. And ever since, the vehicle has been in high demand, trekking to the sea floor 100–150 times a year. Although some countries can dive more deeply, Alvin “is the most reliable submersible there is”, says Susan Humphris, a geochemist at WHOI and principal investigator of the Alvin overhaul. “We need a workhorse at the bottom of the ocean. That’s what Alvin has been and that’s what Alvin will continue to be.”

At the helm

Cindy Van Dover knows the submersible better than any other scientist. Now the director of the Duke University Marine Laboratory in Beaufort, North Carolina, Van Dover spent nearly three years training and working as an Alvin pilot after getting her doctorate at Woods Hole. She is the only researcher, and the only woman, to have piloted the craft, choosing to detour from a conventional research career because the job offered opportunities that few researchers can get. “I wanted to do a lot of dives,” she says. “It was about wanting to see the environment that I was studying.”

In 1991, when Van Dover gave up her pilot’s seat and went back to being an occasional passenger in Alvin, one of the things she missed most was the view. The old sphere, built in 1973, had three 13-centimetre-wide viewports, one on each side for passengers and one at the front for the pilot. Through those saucer-sized side ports, Van Dover says, “sometimes it was a great view but often it wasn’t, so you’d end up watching a video of what the pilot was doing”. The new sphere retains the side windows but has three 18-centimetre-wide ones at the front, giving researchers a field of view that overlaps with the pilot’s (see ‘Voyager to the bottom of the sea’).

ALVIN Illustration by Megan Carroll. © WHOI

The space inside the sphere has also grown, which should make for less-painful rides. With an internal diameter of less than 2 metres, the old sphere had no room for seats; scientists had to huddle on the floor, and lean awkwardly against the sloped walls. After a 2-hour descent to the bottom, limbs would stiffen up. “You switch your position because your legs are so uncomfortable and you rock the whole submersible,” says Chris German, a marine geochemist at WHOI and chief scientist for the US National Deep Submergence Facility in Woods Hole, which coordinates the use of Alvin. “That can compromise taking the samples.”

The new sphere has 18% more interior space and will have ergonomically designed seats. And while sampling or exploring, researchers will be able to take advantage of brighter lights and improved camera systems.

Scientists are keen to use the tools to explore the geology and biology of the mid-ocean ridges, the 60,000-kilometre-long chain of volcanic fissures that forge new ocean crust. So far, oceanographers have surveyed only a tiny fraction of the ridge system. The ridges and their flanks hide a subsurface plumbing network of fissures and pores so extensive that it circulates a volume of water equal to the entire ocean about every million years or so, altering the chemistry of the seas. Future dives will also target the communities of microbes living beneath the sea floor, which has been estimated to constitute as much as one-third of the planet’s biomass. And marine scientists want to study the vast abyssal plains, which cover more than half of Earth’s surface and are poorly explored; most of the species that researchers pull up in samples from abyssal sites are new to science.

But some places that scientists want to visit lie deeper than 4,500 metres and so will remain off-limits to Alvin for now. The National Science Foundation, which is funding most of the Alvin redesign, could not afford to build a 6,500-metre-class sub all at once. In particular, such deep dives require more energy and it would be prohibitively expensive to build a submersible that uses current battery technology to dive frequently and to greater depths.

Rich Lutz, an oceanographer at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, who has racked up more Alvin dives than perhaps any scientist, was surprised to learn that the current overhaul won’t add to the sub’s depth range. “I certainly would have assumed that one of those improvements would be the capability of going down to 6,500 metres,” he says.

Bottom dweller

Yet depth isn’t everything. Despite the excitement over record-breaking dives by China’s Jiaolong (7,020 metres) and Cameron’s DEEPSEA CHALLENGER (11,000 metres), researchers don’t go deep very often. Fewer than 10% of the dives by the French and Japanese submersibles approach their limits. Vincent Rigaud, manager of the underwater systems department at the French Research Institute for Exploration of the Sea in La Seyne-sur-Mer, says that research is increasingly focusing on shallower depths. “The science today is linked to [minerals] exploitation or areas where there is an impact from man’s activities or man’s interests,” he says.

Some US researchers are more upset about other limitations of the new Alvin. “It’s a superb tool for what it does but it could have been a hell of a lot better,” says Bruce Robison, a marine ecologist at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute in Moss Landing, California. In 2004, Robison was a member of a committee of the National Research Council that assessed the future needs of deep submergence science. One of his biggest wishes was for a human-occupied vehicle (HOV) that could adjust its buoyancy to stop at any depth, allowing researchers to work well above the ocean floor. Most of the biological and chemical process in the ocean take place in the water column, not on the sea floor, Robison says. Yet neither the old Alvin nor the rebuilt sub can adjust its buoyancy enough to linger above the sea floor without draining its batteries. So nearly all trips go straight to the bottom.

“What is the future of deep submergence research?”

Along with concerns over Alvin’s limitations, US researchers also lament the loss of several scientific submersibles. Funding woes forced Florida International University’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute in Fort Pierce to retire its two submersibles, the Johnson Sea Links, last year. And the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration plans to stop funding the National Undersea Research Program, which supports two Piscessubmersibles located in Hawaii. The two HOVs are known for their work exploring seamounts in the Pacific Ocean, including the newest Hawaiian volcano. Robison bemoans the loss of all the other US scientific submersibles. “As good as Alvin is,” he says “that isn’t enough.”

Veteran explorer Robert Ballard is not shedding any tears over the HOVs. “I consider that a dead paradigm,” says the marine geologist who discovered the Titanic and co-led the cruise that discovered the first hydrothermal vents; he used Alvin to explore them both. He now relies on autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) and remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), which can be controlled by researchers on a ship or from halfway across the world. “AUVs augmented with ROVs is where I see the future. I don’t need any people in them.”

Alvin is limited to 4–5 hours of work at depth, whereas ROVs can spend days on the bottom and some AUVs can explore for months. And unmanned vehicles don’t require such large support ships and crews as HOVs, which can trim the cost of a mission substantially. Thanks to their data links, ROVs also enable essentially unlimited numbers of researchers around the world to take part in missions.

The ROV Jason 2 has become a favourite tool of US marine geologists, who love its flexibility in exploring and collecting samples down to 6,500 metres. But its heavy steel cable, which supplies power and transmits data, prevents the ROV from diving deeper and complicates missions.

Just up the hill from where Alvin is taking shape at Woods Hole, researchers are working on an experimental vehicle that will sever that troublesome umbilical cord while retaining the advantages of an ROV. Canary yellow and the size of a delivery van, Nereus made headlines in 2009 by reaching the bottom of Challenger Deep in the South Pacific — at 11,000 metres, the lowest spot on Earth. Nereus can operate either autonomously or connected to a surface ship through a fibre-optic cable.

But the tether, just three times the thickness of a human hair, breaks easily. So the Woods Hole team is now working to cut the physical link with the surface. This month, off Guam, the crew will test a laser system on Nereus that sends the data to a receiver hanging down from a ship. Researchers will control Nereus using acoustic signals from the ship.

Despite the advantages of ROVs, most scientists say that there is no substitute for exploring the depths in person. “There is still a place for having a human brain and eyes at the bottom of the ocean,” says Humphris. To those who say there is no need for HOVs, she says “It’s a little bit like saying, ‘Why would you go to the Grand Canyon rather than watching a movie about it?’.”

Alvin is also one of the best recruiting tools in marine science. “It’s what has brought the very best minds to the deep-sea oceanographic community,” says Lutz. “You’re able to tell them, ‘You come work with us and we’re going to take you a mile and a half down to the bottom of the sea in a submersible,’ as opposed to saying, ‘We’re going to take you out on a ship and you’re going to watch it on a television screen’.”

Private money could help to preserve some opportunities for deep-sea science. Eric Schmidt, former chief executive of Google, purchased an 83-metre-long ship in 2010 that he retrofitted for oceanographic science. His Schmidt Ocean Institute will start research cruises with the vessel next year and will test existing ROVs with the aim of purchasing one in a couple of years and making it available for researchers.

And Cameron’s dive aboard his one-person DEEPSEA CHALLENGER fired up the imagination of researchers such as Lutz. “You look at it as a scientist and say, ‘Shit! I’d go down in that thing’.”

Cameron says that his sub is available for anyone willing to put up the money for further expeditions. “I’m more than happy to put in the sub and the technology. It’s not doing any good sitting in my barn,” he says.

In the meantime, the hopes of the US oceanographic community ride on Alvin, which currently rests in pieces at Woods Hole. Looking up at the gleaming passenger sphere, Strickrott takes a moment to picture the day his crew has completed all its work and Alvin is ready to dive once again. “When it gets rolled out here, it’s spotless,” he says. “It’s a beautiful thing.”

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
489,
Pages:
194–196
Date published:
()
DOI:
doi:10.1038/489194a

Corrections

Corrected:

The original text on the graphic describing the work basket said that sample space had increased by 45%. This should have said that carrying capacity has doubled. the graphic has now been amended.

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments

Commenting is currently unavailable.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.