Nature | News

Circular RNAs throw genetics for a loop

RNA ‘sponges’ mop up sequences that curb gene expression.

Article tools

Reza M. Zadegan

Circular non-coding RNA has been found to bind and deactivate microRNAs.

Behold the latest curio in the cabinet of RNA oddities: naturally occurring circular RNA molecules that influence gene expression.

At least some of the loops, described in two papers published this week by Nature1, 2, act as molecular ‘sponges’, binding to and blocking tiny gene modulators called microRNAs. But the researchers suspect that the circular RNAs have many other functions. The molecules comprise “a hidden, parallel universe” of unexplored RNAs, says Nikolaus Rajewsky, the lead author of one of the studies and a systems biologist at the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in Berlin.

The discovery is yet another a reminder that RNA is much more than a mundane messenger ­between DNA and the proteins it encodes. The past two decades have seen the discovery of a host of nonconformist RNAs. Some were unexpectedly short or surprisingly long, and some flouted orthodoxy by blocking other RNA strands from being translated into protein. But almost all were linear. The few accounts of circular RNAs in plants and animals were generally dismissed as genetic accidents or experimental artefacts, says Erik Sontheimer, a molecular biologist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois.

Instead, the predominance of linear RNAs may have been the artefact. Typical RNA-sequencing methods isolate only those mol­ecules with characteristic molecular ‘tails’. With their ends joined together, round RNAs lack those tails, so have generally been overlooked.

But advances in sequencing have allowed biologists to accumulate large data sets of RNA sequences, including some from RNA without tails. Last year, Julia Salzman, a molecular biologist at Stanford University School of Medicine in California, and her colleagues sent the first missive from the circular universe. They reported finding a plethora of circular human RNAs while searching for RNA molecules that conventional methods might have missed3. And when Rajewsky and his colleagues mined databases for circular RNA molecules, they found thousands in nematode worms, mice and humans.

“It’s yet another terrific example of an important RNA that has flown under the radar,” says Sontheimer. “You just wonder when these surprises are going to stop.”

“You just wonder when these surprises are going to stop.”

Rajewsky and his colleagues, and a second, independent team2 led by Thomas Hansen and Jørgen Kjems of Aarhus University in Denmark, focused on a circular behemoth, some 1,500 nucleotides around, that is expressed in the brains of mice and humans. They found that it contains about 70 binding sites for a microRNA called miR-7. MicroRNAs are short fragments of RNA that can block gene expression by binding to and preventing the translation of messenger RNAs. MiR-7 targets have been linked to cancer and Parkinson’s disease.

Hansen’s team found that expression of the circular RNA blocked the blockers. The activity of miR-7 was suppressed, and the expression of miR-7’s target genes increased, presumably because the RNA circle was capturing and inactivating miR-7. Rajewsky’s team showed that expressing the circular RNA or deleting miR-7 in zebrafish altered their brain development.

Circular RNAs could also be sponges for microRNA from outside the cell, notes Rajewsky. Some have possible binding sites for viral microRNAs, which can subvert immune responses. Rajewsky hypothesizes that circular RNA could even interact with RNA-binding proteins. Salzman agrees. “They are so abundant, there are probably a multitude of functional roles,” she says.

So what other shapes might RNAs take? “I can’t think of another form we might have missed,” laughs Phillip Sharp, a molecular biologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. “But you know somebody will find one.”

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
494,
Pages:
415
Date published:
()
DOI:
doi:10.1038/494415a

References

  1. Memczak , S. et al. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11928 (2013).

  2. Hansen, T. B. et al. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11993 (2013).

  3. Salzman, J., Gawad, C., Wang, P. L., Lacayo, N. & Brown, P. O. PLoS ONE 7, e30733 (2012).

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.