Nature | News

China-only science prize honours pathologist and experimental physicist

Research on non-invasive pregnancy tests and superconductors earns US$1-million ‘Chinese Nobels’.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

L: Yuk Ming Dennis Lo. R: Qi-Kun Xue

The work by Dennis Lo (left) led to blood tests for fetal abnormalities. Qi-Kun Xue discovered an exotic behaviour of electrons in materials held at very low temperatures.

The first winners of a prize devoted exclusively to scientific discoveries made in China were announced on 19 September in Beijing.

The Future Forum, a non-profit organization established last year in Beijing, announced that pathologist Yuk Ming Dennis Lo at the Chinese University of Hong Kong has won the life-science Future Science Prize for the discovery that DNA from a fetus can be extracted from the mother’s blood1. The discovery led to the now widely used non-invasive tests to screen a pregnant woman’s blood to see if the fetus has disorders such as Down’s syndrome. Shenzhen-based BGI alone has carried out more than 1 million screens based on the finding.

Qi-Kun Xue of Tsinghua University in Beijing netted the physics prize for the experimental discovery of high-temperature superconductivity at the interfaces of materials2 and the quantized anomalous Hall effect3 — an unusual orderly motion of electrons in a conductor at low temperature. That line of work belongs in the fast-emerging field of topological insulators. Each prize is worth US$1 million.

Xue says that he will “share the money with my colleagues who made significant contribution to the two discoveries”. Lo says he hasn't had time to think about what to do with the money, but that he will start by using some of it to invite family, friends and long-time collaborators to the prize ceremony in January in Beijing. “Everything happened so rapidly today,” says Lo. The prizes were announced at 3 p.m. local time at a press conference.

'Fair and independent'

Organizers stress that the prize, funded by Robin Li, chief executive of China’s giant Internet search engine, Baidu, and several other private industry executives, is awarded on the basis of “fair and independent” selection. Government-sponsored awards and grants have spurred controversy with charges of favouritism and poor stewardship in the past.

Chinese media have billed the awards as “China’s Nobel Prize”. Winners of the annual prize are selected by a Chinese jury, and given only to scientists working in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. The fields can change each year. Up to five scientists can share a prize.

Lo says that the high-profile prizes could bring stories of discoveries to a new generation of Chinese students. “Stories of scientific discoveries are a powerful tool for arousing students’ interests in science,” he says. He notes that the discovery of DNA by Watson and Crick motivated him when he was young.

Last year, China celebrated the first scientific Nobel Prize awarded for work done in the country. That prize was awarded to Youyou Tu, a pharmacologist at the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences in Beijing, for research she had done more than four decades ago. It triggered debate over why there haven’t been more Chinese laureates, and whether the current science funding system in China encourages the type of creativity needed to win such prizes.

China’s Nobel

Lo recognizes that the ‘Chinese Nobel’ is like a “young plant with just the first year of blossom” compared with the real Nobel prize, which has more than a century of achievements. “I am hopeful that, with time, [the Future Science prize] would acquire the status and history enjoyed by its more established counterparts,” he says.

Other science prizes from the Chinese region that draw comparisons with the Nobel prize, such as Taiwan’s Tang Prize and Hong Kong’s Shaw prize, can be awarded for work done anywhere in the world.

Journal name:


  1. Lo, Y. D. M. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 2, 61ra91 (2010).

  2. Wang, Q.-Y. et al. Chinese Phys. Lett. 29, 037402 (2012).

  3. Chang, C.-Z. et al. Science 340, 167170 (2013).

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.


Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up



Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.