Nature | News

China goes back to basics on research funding

Core science gets budget boost in a bid to change research culture and increase innovation.

Article tools

Liu Jiansheng/Xinhua/Photoshot

Premier Li Keqiang pledged support for basic science at last week’s National People’s Congress in Beijing.

Last week, Chinese science saw some big wins as Premier Li Keqiang delivered his first budget since taking office a year ago. Yet observers have warned that to translate that support into innovation, the country must invest more in basic research and move away from its desire for quick successes.

China’s total expenditure on research and development (R&D) has increased by 23% a year on average over the past decade. But with uncertainties arising from a new government and the effects of the economic slowdown, scientists had feared cutbacks this year.

At the opening session of the annual National People’s Congress in Beijing, however, Li reassured the research community by stressing the importance of scientific innovation to economic growth — and by pledging hard cash.

The central government’s expenditure on science and technology this year was set at US$43.6 billion (267.4 billion yuan renminbi), an 8.9% rise on last year, which slightly trails the overall projected budget increase of 9.3%. The biggest winners are 16 ‘megaprojects’ with an emphasis on engineering and applied research in areas such as transgenic crops, nuclear power plants and lunar exploration, which together will receive a whopping $8.1 billion.

Sources: PRC Statistical Yearbook 2013/US NSF Sci. and Eng. Indicators 2014

China’s basic-research spending has historically been extremely low — about 4.8% in 2012 and 2013, compared with 10–25% in developed nations (see ‘Cash draw’). But this year, the appropriation for basic research will increase by 12.5% to $6.6 billion — of which the National Natural Science Foundation of China is slated to get $3.1 billion, says its president, Yang Wei. The major areas that the foundation will fund include studies of biodiversity, air pollution, supercomputers, neurodegenerative diseases and scientific equipment.

Two of the 16 megaprojects have a substantial basic-research component: these are in the areas of drug discovery and major infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS and influenza. And with a combined budget of $488 million, the two initiatives “will continue to strengthen the capacity for drug screening, rapid detection of pathogens and vaccine development”, says Liu Qian, deputy director of the National Health and Family Planning Commission, who oversees the projects.

The Ministry of Science and Technology will spend about 8% of its total budget of $8.1 billion on basic research — including $211 million on six major science programmes in areas such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, stem cells and protein science — and $1.1 billion on developing key technologies.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), which relies mostly on extramural grants to fuel its research, will receive $423 million for 20 ‘strategic priority projects’ in areas ranging from neuroscience to studies of the Tibetan Plateau.

Although such strong support is welcomed, observers such as Richard Suttmeier, a policy researcher at the University of Oregon in Eugene who advises China’s science ministry, fear that more money may not bring more innovation without a sea change in how it is spent, and without a shift in China’s research culture and institutions. This is because of serious concerns about the country’s quality of research.

“While China’s output of publications and patents is impressive, there are very few genuine innovations,” says CAS president Bai Chunli. A key reason, says Yang, is the modest government support for basic research. Moreover, he adds, “a large chunk of China’s R&D expenditure comes from industry”. In 2012, industry contributed 76% of all R&D funding but spent almost nothing on basic science and only 3% on applied research, he says (see ‘Cash draw’). Consequently, 84% of China’s total R&D spending goes on product development, such as the commercialization of technologies, compared with 35–65% in developed economies.

Even research institutes spend only 13% of their funding on basic science and less than one-third on applied research, and are under increasing pressure to engage in development projects that focus on real-world problems. Without a firm footing in solid research, such projects “have limited value in developing an innovative economy”, says Su Jun, a policy researcher at Tsinghua University in Beijing.

Chinese scientists are also concerned by the serious misuse of research grants. A report released by China’s National Audit Office last October shows that the problem is widespread — and that up to half of all research funding has been misused. In a crackdown, one vice-president of Zhejiang University was arrested last December on “suspicion of occupational crime”, according to the Xinhua news agency, and 50 officials at the Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology are under investigation for embezzling R&D funds.

When research grants are used as intended, Chinese science “suffers from excessive bureaucratic interference and a culture of jigong jinli — seeking quick success and short-term gain”, says Muming Poo, director of the CAS Institute of Neuroscience in Shanghai. Officials often demand the demonstration of productivity on an almost yearly basis, and grants can be slashed by 50% if researchers fail in this task.

“The Chinese government is aware of the problems and institutional reforms are firmly on the agenda of the congress to boost R&D efficiency,” says Bai. Topics under discussion at the congress included increasing the proportion of basic research in total R&D to 10% by 2020; instigating policies to encourage investment in basic and applied research; reforming funding and evaluation systems; raising the budget for research overheads; and giving scientists more freedom. Such changes “will be crucial for Chinese science to reach the next level”, says Bai.

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
507,
Pages:
148–149
Date published:
()
DOI:
doi:10.1038/507148a

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.