Nature | News Feature

Archaeology: The milk revolution

When a single genetic mutation first let ancient Europeans drink milk, it set the stage for a continental upheaval.

Article tools

In the 1970s, archaeologist Peter Bogucki was excavating a Stone Age site in the fertile plains of central Poland when he came across an assortment of odd artefacts. The people who had lived there around 7,000 years ago were among central Europe's first farmers, and they had left behind fragments of pottery dotted with tiny holes. It looked as though the coarse red clay had been baked while pierced with pieces of straw.

Looking back through the archaeological literature, Bogucki found other examples of ancient perforated pottery. “They were so unusual — people would almost always include them in publications,” says Bogucki, now at Princeton University in New Jersey. He had seen something similar at a friend's house that was used for straining cheese, so he speculated that the pottery might be connected with cheese-making. But he had no way to test his idea.

Free podcast

Mark Thomas talks about human evolution and the rise of dairying.

You may need a more recent browser or to install the latest version of the Adobe Flash Plugin.

The mystery potsherds sat in storage until 2011, when Mélanie Roffet-Salque pulled them out and analysed fatty residues preserved in the clay. Roffet-Salque, a geochemist at the University of Bristol, UK, found signatures of abundant milk fats — evidence that the early farmers had used the pottery as sieves to separate fatty milk solids from liquid whey. That makes the Polish relics the oldest known evidence of cheese-making in the world1.

Roffet-Salque's sleuthing is part of a wave of discoveries about the history of milk in Europe. Many of them have come from a €3.3-million (US$4.4-million) project that started in 2009 and has involved archaeologists, chemists and geneticists. The findings from this group illuminate the profound ways that dairy products have shaped human settlement on the continent.

During the most recent ice age, milk was essentially a toxin to adults because — unlike children — they could not produce the lactase enzyme required to break down lactose, the main sugar in milk. But as farming started to replace hunting and gathering in the Middle East around 11,000 years ago, cattle herders learned how to reduce lactose in dairy products to tolerable levels by fermenting milk to make cheese or yogurt. Several thousand years later, a genetic mutation spread through Europe that gave people the ability to produce lactase — and drink milk — throughout their lives. That adaptation opened up a rich new source of nutrition that could have sustained communities when harvests failed.

This two-step milk revolution may have been a prime factor in allowing bands of farmers and herders from the south to sweep through Europe and displace the hunter-gatherer cultures that had lived there for millennia. “They spread really rapidly into northern Europe from an archaeological point of view,” says Mark Thomas, a population geneticist at University College London. That wave of emigration left an enduring imprint on Europe, where, unlike in many regions of the world, most people can now tolerate milk. “It could be that a large proportion of Europeans are descended from the first lactase-persistent dairy farmers in Europe,” says Thomas.

Strong stomachs

Young children almost universally produce lactase and can digest the lactose in their mother's milk. But as they mature, most switch off the lactase gene. Only 35% of the human population can digest lactose beyond the age of about seven or eight (ref. 2). “If you're lactose intolerant and you drink half a pint of milk, you're going to be really ill. Explosive diarrhoea — dysentery essentially,” says Oliver Craig, an archaeologist at the University of York, UK. “I'm not saying it's lethal, but it's quite unpleasant.”

MAP SOURCE: REF. 2

Most people who retain the ability to digest milk can trace their ancestry to Europe, where the trait seems to be linked to a single nucleotide in which the DNA base cytosine changed to thymine in a genomic region not far from the lactase gene. There are other pockets of lactase persistence in West Africa (see Nature 444, 994996; 2006), the Middle East and south Asia that seem to be linked to separate mutations3 (see 'Lactase hotspots').

The single-nucleotide switch in Europe happened relatively recently. Thomas and his colleagues estimated the timing by looking at genetic variations in modern populations and running computer simulations of how the related genetic mutation might have spread through ancient populations4. They proposed that the trait of lactase persistence, dubbed the LP allele, emerged about 7,500 years ago in the broad, fertile plains of Hungary.

Powerful gene

Once the LP allele appeared, it offered a major selective advantage. In a 2004 study5, researchers estimated that people with the mutation would have produced up to 19% more fertile offspring than those who lacked it. The researchers called that degree of selection “among the strongest yet seen for any gene in the genome”.

Compounded over several hundred generations, that advantage could help a population to take over a continent. But only if “the population has a supply of fresh milk and is dairying”, says Thomas. “It's gene–culture co-evolution. They feed off of each other.”

To investigate the history of that interaction, Thomas teamed up with Joachim Burger, a palaeogeneticist at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany, and Matthew Collins, a bioarchaeologist at the University of York. They organized a multidisciplinary project called LeCHE (Lactase Persistence in the early Cultural History of Europe), which brought together a dozen early-career researchers from around Europe.

By studying human molecular biology and the archaeology and chemistry of ancient pottery, LeCHE participants also hoped to address a key issue about the origins of modern Europeans. “It's been an enduring question in archaeology — whether we're descended from Middle Eastern farmers or indigenous hunter-gatherers,” says Thomas. The argument boils down to evolution versus replacement. Did native populations of hunter-gatherers in Europe take up farming and herding? Or was there an influx of agricultural colonists who outcompeted the locals, thanks to a combination of genes and technology?

One strand of evidence came from studies of animal bones found at archaeological sites. If cattle are raised primarily for dairying, calves are generally slaughtered before their first birthday so that their mothers can be milked. But cattle raised mainly for meat are killed later, when they have reached their full size. (The pattern, if not the ages, is similar for sheep and goats, which were part of the dairying revolution.)

MAP SOURCE: REF. 2; POT PHOTOGRAPH: REF. 1

On the basis of studies of growth patterns in bones, LeCHE participant Jean-Denis Vigne, an archaeozoologist at the French National Museum of Natural History in Paris, suggests that dairying in the Middle East may go all the way back to when humans first started domesticating animals there, about 10,500 years ago6. That would place it just after the Middle Eastern Neolithic transition — when an economy based on hunter-gathering gave way to one devoted to agriculture. Dairying, says Roz Gillis, also an archaeozoologist at the Paris museum, “may have been one of the reasons why human populations began trapping and keeping ruminants such as cattle, sheep and goats”. (See 'Dairy diaspora'.)

Dairying then expanded in concert with the Neolithic transition, says Gillis, who has looked at bone growth at 150 sites in Europe and Anatolia (modern Turkey). As agriculture spread from Anatolia to northern Europe over roughly two millennia, dairying followed a similar pattern. 

On their own, the growth patterns do not say whether the Neolithic transition in Europe happened through evolution or replacement, but cattle bones offer important clues. In a precursor study7, Burger and several other LeCHE participants found that domesticated cattle at Neolithic sites in Europe were most closely related to cows from the Middle East, rather than indigenous wild aurochs. This is a strong indication that incoming herders brought their cattle with them, rather than domesticating locally, says Burger. A similar story is emerging from studies of ancient human DNA recovered at a few sites in central Europe, which suggest that Neolithic farmers were not descended from the hunter-gatherers who lived there before8.

Taken together, the data help to resolve the origins of the first European farmers. “For a long time, the mainstream of continental European archaeology said Mesolithic hunter-gatherers developed into Neolithic farmers,” says Burger. “We basically showed they were completely different.”

Milk or meat

Given that dairying in the Middle East started thousands of years before the LP allele emerged in Europe, ancient herders must have found ways to reduce lactose concentrations in milk. It seems likely that they did so by making cheese or yogurt. (Fermented cheeses such as feta and cheddar have a small fraction of the lactose found in fresh milk; aged hard cheeses similar to Parmesan have hardly any.)

To test that theory, LeCHE researchers ran chemical tests on ancient pottery. The coarse, porous clay contains enough residues for chemists to distinguish what type of fat was absorbed during the cooking process: whether it was from meat or milk, and from ruminants such as cows, sheep and goats or from other animals. “That gave us a way into saying what types of things were being cooked,” says Richard Evershed, a chemist at the University of Bristol.

“It's been an enduring question in archaeology — whether we're descended from Middle Eastern farmers or indigenous hunter-gatherers.”

Evershed and his LeCHE collaborators found milk fat on pottery in the Middle Eastern Fertile Crescent going back at least 8,500 years9, and Roffet-Salque's work on the Polish pottery1 offers clear evidence that herders in Europe were producing cheese to supplement their diets between 6,800 and 7,400 years ago. By then, dairy had become a component of the Neolithic diet, but it was not yet a dominant part of the economy.

That next step happened slowly, and it seems to have required the spread of lactase persistence. The LP allele did not become common in the population until some time after it first emerged: Burger has looked for the mutation in samples of ancient human DNA and has found it only as far back as 6,500 years ago in northern Germany.

Models created by LeCHE participant Pascale Gerbault, a population geneticist at University College London, explain how the trait might have spread. As Middle Eastern Neolithic cultures moved into Europe, their farming and herding technologies helped them to out-compete the local hunter-gatherers. And as the southerners pushed north, says Gerbault, the LP allele 'surfed' the wave of migration.

Lactase persistence had a harder time becoming established in parts of southern Europe, because Neolithic farmers had settled there before the mutation appeared. But as the agricultural society expanded northwards and westwards into new territory, the advantage provided by lactase persistence had a big impact. “As the population grows quickly at the edge of the wave, the allele can increase in frequency,” says Gerbault.

The remnants of that pattern are still visible today. In southern Europe, lactase persistence is relatively rare — less than 40% in Greece and Turkey. In Britain and Scandinavia, by contrast, more than 90% of adults can digest milk.

Cattle conquest

By the late Neolithic and early Bronze Age, around 5,000 years ago, the LP allele was prevalent across most of northern and central Europe, and cattle herding had become a dominant part of the culture. “They discover this way of life, and once they can really get the nutritional benefits they increase or intensify herding as well,” says Burger. Cattle bones represent more than two-thirds of the animal bones in many late Neolithic and early Bronze Age archaeological sites in central and northern Europe.

The LeCHE researchers are still puzzling out exactly why the ability to consume milk offered such an advantage in these regions. Thomas suggests that, as people moved north, milk would have been a hedge against famine. Dairy products — which could be stored for longer in colder climes — provided rich sources of calories that were independent of growing seasons or bad harvests.

Others think that milk may have helped, particularly in the north, because of its relatively high concentration of vitamin D, a nutrient that can help to ward off diseases such as rickets. Humans synthesize vitamin D naturally only when exposed to the sun, which makes it difficult for northerners to make enough during winter months. But lactase persistence also took root in sunny Spain, casting vitamin D's role into doubt.

The LeCHE project may offer a model for how archaeological questions can be answered using a variety of disciplines and tools. “They have got a lot of different tentacles — archaeology, palaeoanthropology, ancient DNA and modern DNA, chemical analysis — all focused on one single question,” says Ian Barnes, a palaeogeneticist at Royal Holloway, University of London, who is not involved in the project. “There are lots of other dietary changes which could be studied in this way.”

The approach could, for example, help to tease apart the origins of amylase, an enzyme that helps to break down starch. Researchers have suggested that the development of the enzyme may have followed — or made possible — the increasing appetite for grain that accompanied the growth of agriculture. Scientists also want to trace the evolution of alcohol dehydrogenase, which is crucial to the breakdown of alcohol and could reveal the origins of humanity's thirst for drink.

Some of the LeCHE participants are now probing further back in time, as part of a project named BEAN (Bridging the European and Anatolian Neolithic), which is looking at how the first farmers and herders made their way into Europe. Burger, Thomas and their BEAN collaborators will be in Turkey this summer, tracing the origins of the Neolithic using computer models and ancient-DNA analysis in the hope of better understanding who the early farmers were, and when they arrived in Europe.

Along the way, they will encounter beyaz peynir, a salty sheep's-milk cheese eaten with nearly every Turkish breakfast. It is probably much like the cheese that Neolithic farmers in the region would have eaten some 8,000 years ago — long before the march of lactase persistence allowed people to drink fresh milk.

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
500,
Pages:
20–22
Date published:
()
DOI:
doi:10.1038/500020a

References

  1. Salque, M. et al. Nature 493, 522525 (2013).

  2. Leonardi, M., Gerbault, P., Thomas, M. G. & Burger, J. Int. Dairy J. 22, 8897 (2012).

  3. Gerbault, P. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 863877 (2011).

  4. Itan, Y., Powell, A., Beaumont, M. A., Burger, J. & Thomas, M. G. PLoS Comp. Biol. 5, e1000491 (2009).

  5. Bersaglieri, T. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 11111120 (2004).

  6. Vigne, J.-D. in The Neolithic Demographic Transition and its Consequences (eds Bocquet-Appel, J.-P. & Bar-Yosef, O.) 179205 (Springer, 2008).

  7. Edwards, C. J. et al. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 13771385 (2007).

  8. Bramanti, B. et al. Science 326, 137140 (2009).

  9. Evershed, R. P. et al. Nature 455, 528531 (2008).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Andrew Curry is a freelance writer in Berlin.

Author details

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

26 comments Subscribe to comments

  1. Avatar for Garth Everson
    Garth Everson
    Is it possible that Irregular lactase hotspots (eg Southern Spain) may have arisen from colonisation from "dairying countries" eg by Normans, Vikings?
  2. Avatar for Ninad Varkhede
    Ninad Varkhede
    A novel way to look at history! Also, fabulously written article. I have a doubts: LeCHE researchers used the fats deposited in the ancient pottery as proof for promulgating whether the source of fat is meat or milk. Don't you think that, over the time, cattles too might have evolved and changed their fats? Is there any evidence that, cattles produced the same fat at that time also? It is also possible that, the fat which we found in the pottery, was from some different animal meat, and that fat is now observed as a component of cattle milk.
  3. Avatar for piotr kuala
    piotr kuala
    I think we're only beginning to understand what's going on here. --------------------------------------------- przeprowadzki poznań
  4. Avatar for William Wiegman
    William Wiegman
    My paternal Grandmother's family has lived in the same house on the German/Dutch border for about 650 years. I drink milk every day and seek it out to settle my stomach when it is upset. Put me in for the alcohol dehydrogenase gene, too! :)
  5. Avatar for Richard Stevens
    Richard Stevens
    It seems likely to me that lactase persistence originated somewhere in western or southwestern Asia. One reason for thinking that is the relatively high levels of the main European LP SNP, T 13910, among the Fulani of Mali in Africa. The Fulani also have a high frequency of the y-dna haplogroup R1b-V88, which probably split from the rest of R1b-P25 somewhere in west Asia. R1b of any kind is relatively rare in Africa, but it is dominant in western and especially northwestern Europe. http://www.malariajournal.com/content/10/1/9
  6. Avatar for Richard Stevens
    Richard Stevens
    The problem with the whole idea of the Anglo-Saxons and Vikings as transmitters of lactase persistence to the British Isles is that a recent study showed that lactase persistence increases as one moves north and west in the British Isles, that is, away from those areas most thickly settled by Anglo-Saxons and Vikings. http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v17/n3/full/ejhg2008156a.html Red hair is also more frequent in the old "Celtic Fringe" of the British Isles than it is in those areas settled by the Anglo-Saxons and Vikings. http://edition.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/world/2013/04/26/sweeney-redhead-gene.cnn.html
  7. Avatar for Gordon Lehman
    Gordon Lehman
    The blond/red hair and blue eyes lactose tolerant phenotype seems associated with a very poorly understood group of tribes occupying the Jutland Peninsula. The Angles, Saxons, and Jutes as we know them enjoyed a great proliferation and diaspora for mysterious reasons not clearly climate related near the beginning of the common era. They spread to England en masse after the Roman abdication and to Scandinavia. From Scandinavia, perhaps related to the Medieval Warm Period, they enjoyed a diaspora as Vikings, dragging their boats between river basins to maraud and trade all over Europe. The name Russia refers red hair. And so one can see it will not be so easy to map this, or any other phenotype. Primogeniture is fundamental and the junior sons of successful and proliferating cultures band together like wild dogs to become highly mobile wild cards of gene distribution and cultural hegemony. Add to this that lactose tolerance is not genetically difficult (after all it is a capability that is turned off) and the likelihood that it will return any time and anywhere it becomes beneficial...
  8. Avatar for Guest
    Guest
    Great article showcasing some great research, but why the Euro-centric slant? "Most people who retain the ability to digest milk can trace their ancestry to Europe..." The evidence from the "hotspot" map seems to contradict this. The above quote and phrases like "Europe's first farmers, and "cows from the Middle East" versus "indigenous wild aurochs" all paint a picture of a unified European land and people to be looked at as distinct from the rest of the world. The facts don't support such divisions. Europe is a large piece of land with lots of diversity in history, people and culture. Its borders are not solid and history of neighboring lands overlaps with border areas, e.g. history of Greece and Italy is hard to separate from the history of the Levant (part of the Middle East) and other Mediterranean lands.
  9. Avatar for Guest
    Guest
    Great article showcasing some great research, but why the Euro-centric slant? "Most people who retain the ability to digest milk can trace their ancestry to Europe..." The evidence from the "hotspot" map seems to contradict this. The above quote and phrases like "Europe's first farmers, and "cows from the Middle East" versus "indigenous wild aurochs" all paint a picture of a unified European land and people to be looked at as distinct from the rest of the world. The facts don't support such divisions. Europe is a large piece of land with lots of diversity in history, people and culture. Its borders are not solid and history of neighboring lands overlaps with border areas, e.g. history of Greece and Italy is hard to separate from the history of the Levant (part of the Middle East) and other Mediterranean lands.
  10. Avatar for Frosty Dufour
    Frosty Dufour
    "Only 35% of the human population can digest lactose beyond the age of about seven or eight (ref. 2). " Thirty-five percent is a lot, imo, so I wouldn't think the ability to digest lactose is rare.
  11. Avatar for G P
    G P
    Raw milk contains lactase producing bacteria, so anyone consuming milk in its raw form would be able to digest it without any digestion problems. Only pasteurized milk is lactase free as heating destroys the bacteria that produce the enzyme. Most milk historically would have been consumed raw so an adaptation to produce lactase would have been unnecessary and would not provide a significant competitive advantage. Which brings us to this question: If milk in its natural form right out of the goat contains the lactase enzyme in sufficient amounts for proper digestion, then why would we need to produce lactase at all? We have a classic case here of confusion between correlation and causation. Just because some cultures have adapted to producing the lactase enzyme doesn't have anything at all to do with their ability to consume raw milk. I would look instead at other possible reasons. Could consumption of heated milk products such as hard cheese been a biological driving factor to select for lactase production? If they made hard cheeses from heated milk, they would need to produce lactase to digest it. Another possibility is since dairy consuming cultures tend to produce (the rather unnecessary) lactase enzyme, we could hypothesize that lactase production was stimulated by dairy consumption rather than the other way around. Couldn't the gene simply be switched on epigenetically when humans consume milk products multi-generationally? I think we're only beginning to understand what's going on here.
  12. Avatar for Alan Hoch
    Alan Hoch
    Sorry, but raw milk DOES NOT contain lactase producing bacteria -- that is just an urban myth propagated primarily by raw milk enthusiasts who have an amazing (and scary) tendency to badly understand the dangers and limitations of drinking unpasteurized milk. Thus, the whole premise of your question is unfounded -- humans needed to develop a mutation to produce Lactose precisely because they otherwise wouldn't be able to do so as an adult.
  13. Avatar for erik baard
    erik baard
    This mutation seems roughly concurrent with the mutation for blue eyes in humans, and regionally not too far off (northwest of the Black Sea, for blue eyes). It's a mystery why blue eyes so quickly became a common feature. Some believe it's the result of sexual selection and others that more visible pupil action allowed for another level of communication (albeit involuntary) and bonding. But perhaps lightning struck twice and it just happens that the blue population arose from the lactase population, or the reverse. In that case blue eyes would have received a rather substantial boost from lactase association. Running back the molecular clock might reveal the answer pretty readily.
  14. Avatar for Alan Hoch
    Alan Hoch
    The map shows where lactose tolerance is NOW, not necessarily where it was originally developed. Populations can travel great distances over the process of thousands of years while back where they began their migrations later migrations of other groups could easily have effectively wiped out the original stock. To figure out where the mutation may have originally developed you need to look at information far more complex than just a picture of where Lactose Tolerant people live nowadays. After all, if you looked at a similar map of North America you'd find a good percentage of individuals who are tolerant, but that is because their genetic background lies back in Northern Europe. By comparison, Lactose Tolerance among Native Americans (whose genetic background is North America) is pretty much zero.
  15. Avatar for James T. Dwyer
    James T. Dwyer
    I haven't studied the subject, but from the geographical distribution map I see that Ireland and England are nearly completely lactose tolerant. While England certainly had some significant Scandinavian population influences, my impression is that Ireland has less. At least, there seems to be a lot of brown-eyed Irish people who are lactose tolerant... From the map it might even be argued that lactose tolerance originated in Ireland & England - spreading from there to Northern France and, because of the survival benefits in regions where growing seasons are short, on to Northern Europe...
  16. Avatar for Prem Narain
    Prem Narain
    1. It is a very significant story of the origin of LP allele in enabling people to digest milk. My father-in-law, from India, could't digest milk whereas others in the family could. Does it mean that he didn't have LP allele while others did? It is also puzzling that a new-born child has it to be able to digest mother's milk but it gets switched off when he/she grows older. That raises the question what happens to those children who are deprived of mother's milk and fed on market dairy milk as has been the practice of some mothers in modern times. 2. The story however does not mention India in this context. I agree with Dr. Upinder Fotadar's comments about cow worship in India and origin of dairying in Vedas, the ancient Hindu scriptures. 3. Perhaps the projects being undertaken in this context may be enlarged to include India for possible archaeological linkages.
  17. Avatar for L B
    L B
    This is standard leftist propaganda that if it can't be "Out of Africa" it has to "Out of the Middle East". Nothing can evolve in (or expand out of) ancient Europe, and in fact ancient Europeans never even really existed, Europe has only ever been a "destination for immigrants". It's been proven that modern (Northern) Europeans are not primarily descended from the small number of Anatolian farmers who shifted their habitat up the Danube during the mid-Holocene Climatic Optimum. (Which incidentally, on the subject of leftist propaganda, was so much warmer than today that Denmark had a Mediterranean climate.) And the signature characteristic of adult lactase persistence in Europe is its identifiability with the blond Nordic type. The blonder you are, not the more Middle Eastern looking you are, the more likely you are to have it. So who are these blonds? Where did they come from? When did they get their hair and eye color? Where did they get those giant ultra-modern skulls and that microcephalin haplogroup D gene for larger brain size from? Where did they really spend the last glacial maximum -- are they the Iberians showing up in Morocco 30,000 years ago? When and by what routes did they re-populate the North Sea/Baltic region? How did they get down to the Ukraine for the Indo-European expansion 5000 years ago? That little bit of background context is needed, before we can ask when, where, and how did they become lactase-persistent, and how did this characteristic spread through Europe, and down to India with their chariots. A background context the Left is working full time today to erase from history -- in advance of the final erasure of its subjects as well.
  18. Avatar for Upinder Fotadar
    Upinder Fotadar
    In my opinion the Anatolian origin hypothesis of the Aryan Race (Indo-European is a new term and does not exist in the Rigvedic-Avestan texts), is a carefully planted one. The first mention of the Aryan (Indo-European) people is in the Rigveda and Avesta. These texts make no mention of Anatolia! Dr. Upinder Fotadar
  19. Avatar for Michael Rover
    Michael Rover
    The earliest known Indo-European texts, however, are Hittite, and were located in Asia Minor, i.e. Anatolia. And Indo-European is generally considered a linguistic term, not racial anyways. The dispersion of Indo-European languages may well have been associated with some level of migration of people, in fact that is very likely, but the dispersion of Indo-European language appears from a linguistic evolution perspective to have proceeded out of Anatolia.
  20. Avatar for r s johal
    r s johal
    Im pretty sure the earliest are the Vedas. I know Abrahamic religions promote civilization rose with Noahs sons from the middle east/Anatolia, and the Hittites are considered a branch of Shem/Japeth, so maybe thats why Anatolia is being heavily promoted. I would consider the Hittites to be an Indic tribe. The so called linguistic evolution has been dismissed by many Indian scholars, for the selective terms used in that study. Also the age of indus civilisation in recent studies have been pushed back 2000years making it older than Egypt and Sumeria. Like Dr Fotadar correctly stated, there is no mention at all of any migration into India according to the Vedas and Avesta, however they do state a migration out of India (Something that is always overlooked). Genetics proves no migration from europe entered india, but does suggest a few migrations out of (warm, tropical) india into colder northern climates of europe, via central asia. In my opinion, Europeans are White Indians, effectively one race, originating from India.
  21. Avatar for Michael Rover
    Michael Rover
    Yeah, so, you're wrong. Hittite texts go back to the 16th century BC ... note I said texts, not composition dates, actual texts. And as for your theory about Europeans being "White Indians," did you even read the article above? About the evolution of lactase persistence and its genetic spread through Europe? And about how separate mutations are involved in the ME and South Asia? Hindu nationalists have attempted to reject the Indo-European linguistic analysis, going to great lengths to do so, but virtually everybody EXCEPT Indians considers their attempts to be fanatical nationalism. The two competing theories among scholars for the original point of proliferation and diversification consist of the Russian steppes and Anatolia. That isn't because every academic linguist across the world is in love with Asia Minor for some inexplicable reason, it's because that's what the evidence shows; the languages diverge outward from these regions, not out from India, which has only one isolated and derived branch of the Indo-European language family. There's no credible way to create an Indo-European language tree that involves Indian origins.
  22. Avatar for Upinder Fotadar
    Upinder Fotadar
    Indeed the Anatolian model of the origin of the Aryan (Indo-European) Race is not only flawed but is clearly politically loaded. Moreover, the Hindus have no concept of Adam in their faith. In fact, the concept of Adam arrived mainly in India via Semitic Islam. The individual from whom Hindus derive their origin is Manu. Moreover, the word man is surely linked to Manu.. Interestingly the name Manuchehr (face of Manu) is not uncommon to this day in modern Iran and regions of Central Asia, even with these regions predominantly following Semitic Islam at present.. Many credible experts have quite often rightfully mentioned that the origin of the Aryan Race is Central Asia and the bordering Northwestern regions of the Indian subcontinent.The Aryans are described as a Race in the Rigvedic-Avestan texts and later in the Ramayana. Darius 1 (5th century BCE) in his inscription in Naqshe-e-Rostam also clearly mentions his origin from the Aryan Race. At present the Ridvedic-Avestan are evidently the oldest known genuine Aryan texts. Interestingly the ancient Indo-Persian texts also inform us that this race had Gandum (a common Sanskrit-Persian word for wheat) to fair color. Dr. Upinder Fotadar
  23. Avatar for Alan Hoch
    Alan Hoch
    "Indo-European" is a linguistic term, not a genetic one. It refers to the fact that languages common to Europe and India quite clearly have a common basis -- that is, they arose from an ancient prehistoric language experts call PIE (Proto-Indo-European) that is generally understood to have been originally spoken in the Russian steppes many thousands of years ago. From there the language spread out both east and west where it developed into a large family of languages that today includes (among many others) English, Italian, Greek, Hindi, and Urdu. The Hittites were merely the first Indo-European speakers to write down their language, but the Anatolian branch (which is now extinct) is merely one of many and is not considered the source or origin region for PIE. Regardless, I frankly don't understand why you are bringing up race at all given the nature of this article -- it's frankly inappropriate and highly inflammatory.
  24. Avatar for r s johal
    r s johal
    In your opinion, does the data suggest an Indian development of Milk is more likely, as Zebu cows where domesticated in India, and genetic data refutes any migration from europe into India, however migration from India to Europe has been detected? Thanks.
  25. Avatar for Ari Weinreb
    Ari Weinreb
    One of the hypotheses mentioned to explain the advantage of milk consumption was that it provided a source of vitamin D to individuals living in higher latitudes who may have had less sunlight exposure. However, raw milk is not a very good source of vitamin D. Our current milk supply is fortified with vitamin D, since milk is not a significant natural dietary source of the vitamin. Therefore, it is unclear how postulating vitamin D content as confering an advantage to Neolithic/Bronze Age populations in Northern and Central Europe can even be considered by some as a hypothesis.
  26. Avatar for Upinder Fotadar
    Upinder Fotadar
    The Gow (cow) has been worshiped in India since time immemorial, since the Indians discovered quite early the benefits of milk. Though cow worship is not a part of our faith (ancient Indians consumed beef as well), yet because of the utility of the cow and the bull in ancient India they both gained great esteem in the Indian culture. Thus most of us Hindus do not consume beef. Also interestingly, India today is the largest producer of milk on our planet. Dr. Upinder Fotadar

App happy

mental-health-app

Mental health: There’s an app for that

Smartphone apps claim to help conditions from addiction to schizophrenia, but few have been thoroughly tested.

Newsletter

The best science news from Nature and beyond, direct to your inbox every day.

Against the odds

grant-money

How one lab challenged a grant rejection and won €5 million

When the European Commission rejected a $5.7-million grant application from computational scientist Peter Coveney, he decided to fight.

LSD lessons

LSD-brain

Brain scans reveal how LSD affects consciousness

Drugs researcher David Nutt discusses brain-imaging studies with hallucinogens.

Rewriting cosmology?

universe-expanding

Measurement of Universe's expansion rate creates cosmological puzzle

Discrepancy between observations could point to new physics.

GM embryos

crispr-embryos

Second Chinese team reports gene editing in human embryos

Study used CRISPR technology to introduce HIV-resistance mutation into embryos.

Tune in

red-full-label

This week...

Apps that claim to treat mental health issues, ritual human sacrifice, and supernova debris on Earth.

Science jobs from naturejobs