Nature | News

Alzheimer’s treatment appears to alleviate memory loss in small trial

Larger studies are under way to test whether the promising early data holds up.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

Juan Gaertner/Science Photo Library

  Amyloid plaque build-up (yellow) in the brain is a characteristic of Alzheimer's disease.

A drug called aducanumab might remove the toxic proteins thought to trigger Alzheimer’s disease from the brain, suggests findings from a small clinical trial.

The results, reported on 31 August in Nature1, showed that aducanumab broke up amyloid-β proteins in patients with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. The trial mainly tested the safety of the drug in people, and so the final word on whether aducanumab works to ameliorate the memory and cognitive losses associated with Alzheimer’s will have to wait until the completion of two larger phase III trials.  They are now in progress, and planned to run until at least 2020.

The latest study involved 165 people split into different groups, some of which received the drug and one which received a placebo. In the group receiving infusions of aducanumab, 103 patients given the drug once a month for up to 54 weeks experienced a reduction in the amount of tangled amyloid-β in their brains. These results echoed the findings of a pretrial mouse study — reported in the same paper1 — in which the drug seemed to clear amyloid-β plaques from the animals’ brains.

“This drug had a more profound effect in reversing amyloid-plaque burden than we have seen to date,” says psychiatrist Eric Reiman, executive director of the Banner Alzheimer’s Institute in Phoenix, Arizona, who is testing other approaches for Alzheimer’s prevention and treatment. “That is a very striking and encouraging finding and a major advance.” Reiman wrote a commentary accompanying the article.

“This is the best news we’ve had in my 25 years of doing Alzheimer’s research, and it brings hope to patients and families affected by the disease,” says neurologist Stephen Salloway of Butler Hospital in Providence, Rhode Island, who was on the team that ran the trial.

Proceed with caution

Patients in the groups that got the drug were given one of four different doses of aducanumab. Individuals who received the highest doses also saw the highest reductions in plaques. And a group of 91 patients treated for 54 weeks saw slower cognitive declines than did those who received placebo infusions.

Scientists have debated for years whether the build-up of amyloid-β causes the memory loss and other symptoms of Alzheimer’s. This trial is a point in favour of the “amyloid hypothesis”, which suggests that elimination of the protein itself might alleviate the disease’s symptoms.

Still, Reiman cautions, the trial is too small to prove that the drug actually works. Numerous other Alzheimer’s drugs have looked promising in early-stage trials, yet ended in failure, and even in the deaths of patients.

Aducanumab led to abnormalities on brain-imaging scans in less than one-third of the patients. But researchers closely monitor such anomalies in Alzheimer’s trials, because some participants in previous Alzheimer’s antibody trials have died as a result of brain inflammation.

All of the reported imaging abnormalities eventually disappeared in about 4 to 12 weeks, and no patients were hospitalized. Some people with imaging anomalies continued to take the drug despite these side effects. Patients who received higher doses of the drug, or who had genetic risk factors for Alzheimer’s, were more likely to develop the brain anomalies.

Biogen — the company that makes aducanumab — has adjusted the drug’s dosage and the monitoring schedule for people with genetic risk for Alzheimer’s in its phase 3 trials. Reiman says that the drugmakers will need to determine whether there is a dosage that hits a “sweet spot” at which it is strong enough to work without causing potentially lethal brain inflammation.

Looking forward

Aducanumab is a bright spot in the field of Alzheimer’s therapeutics after years of failed antibody and other types of drug trials. The antibody drug solanezumab failed to slow cognitive decline in two large 2013 clinical trials, but is currently being tested in multiple other trials. One includes individuals with mild Alzheimer’s disease, and could report results as early as the end of this year.

Other therapeutic strategies undergoing clinical trials include targeting enzymes called β-secretase 1, involved in processing amyloid proteins; targeting antibodies to attack a form of amyloid protein — the “pyroglutamate” form — found in plaques; and targeting a protein called tau that also seems to be implicated in the disease.

“The fact that we now have an antibody that gets into the brain sufficiently enough to engage its target and remove plaques is an important development, and we look forward to seeing results from this and other phase 3 trials,” Reiman says.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20509

References

  1. Sevigny, J. et al. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature19323 (2016).

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

1 comment Subscribe to comments

  1. Avatar for Lane Simonian
    Lane Simonian
    The problem here lies in the premise: amyloid plaques are thought to trigger Alzheimer's disease. If amyloid plaques are the cause of Alzheimer's disease, then removing them should not only slow down the progression of Alzheimer's disease, it should stop the progression of Alzheimer's disease. But the data from Biogen's earlier trial does not even support the first conclusion. The data for dropouts was carried forward from the last observed results to 54 weeks. This highly skews the data as the highest percentage of dropouts was in the high dose group so at 54 weeks you are comparing apples to oranges. Or put another way you are comparing the cognitive function of a placebo group most of whom made it to 54 weeks with the cognitive function of the highest dose group 31 percent who dropped out early and whose cognitive function would have continued to decline if they had stayed in the trial. Compounding this "error" is that many of the dropouts had the ApoE4 gene and these individuals tend to see sharper levels of cognitive decline during the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Rather than confirming the amyloid hypothesis, Biogen is likely to end up disproving. But that in itself will represent progress. https://neurogram.wordpress.com/2015/03/23/aducanumab-less-than-meets-the-eye/
sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.