Nature | News Feature

Translations

عربي

A world where everyone has a robot: why 2040 could blow your mind

Technological change is accelerating today at an unprecedented speed and could create a world we can barely begin to imagine.

Article tools

Illustration by Greygouar

Nature special: Future generations

In March 2001, futurist Ray Kurzweil published an essay arguing that humans found it hard to comprehend their own future. It was clear from history, he argued, that technological change is exponential — even though most of us are unable to see it — and that in a few decades, the world would be unrecognizably different. “We won’t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century — it will be more like 20,000 years of progress (at today’s rate),” he wrote, in ‘The Law of Accelerating Returns’.

Fifteen years on, Kurzweil is a director of engineering at Google and his essay has acquired a cult following among futurists. Some of its predictions are outlandish or over-hyped — but technology experts say that its basic tenets often hold. The evidence, they say, lies in the exponential advances in a suite of enabling technologies ranging from computing power to data storage, to the scale and performance of the Internet (see ‘Onwards and upwards’). These advances are creating tipping points — moments at which technologies such as robotics, artificial intelligence (AI), biology, nanotechnology and 3D printing cross a threshold and trigger sudden and significant change. “We live in a mind-blowingly different world than our grandparents,” says Fei-Fei Li, head of the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in California, and this will be all the more true for our children and grandchildren (see 'Future focus').

Kurzweil and others have argued that people find this pace of change almost impossible to grasp, because it is human nature to perceive rates of progress as linear, not exponential — much as when one zooms in on a small part of a circle and it appears as an almost straight line. People tend to focus on the past few years, but pulling back reveals a much more dramatic change. Many things that society now takes for granted would have seemed like futuristic nonsense just a few decades ago. We can search across billions of pages, images and videos on the web; mobile phones have become ubiquitous; billions of connected smart sensors monitor in real time everything from the state of the planet to our heartbeats, sleep and steps; and drones and satellites the size of shoeboxes roam the skies.

Onwards and upwards

Exponential advances in enabling technologies have reached the point at which they could trigger disruptive change in sectors from artificial intelligence to robotics to medicine. As a result, many experts argue that tomorrow’s world will be unrecognizable from that of today.

ENABLERS

1. Computing power The exponential growth in supercomputing performance is one indicator of dizzying advances across computing. Supercomputers in 2020 are likely to be 30 times more powerful than those of today.

2. Really big data The amount of data worldwide is predicted to reach a whopping 44 zettabytes (1021 bytes) by 2020 — nearly as many digital bits as there are stars in the Universe. This gives more raw material for artificial-intelligence machines to learn from.

3. Communication speed Meanwhile, the performance and scale of the Internet improves. Broadband and WiFi speeds are increasing, and Internet data traffic will exceed a zettabyte this year and double by 2019.

DRIVERS

4. Talking devices By 2020, the number of connected sensors and devices in buildings, cities and farms — the ‘Internet of Things’ — will be twice that of the human population.

5. Biology booms Conceptual and technological advances are driving progress in biology. DNA sequencing costs have fallen at an exponential rate and the number of sequences has soared since 1985. Similar advances are happening in neuroscience and biological nanotechnology.

6. Like it, print it 3D printing is becoming cheaper and quicker — one factor that could disrupt manufacturing and allow once-pricey robotics to be mass produced.

7. Rise of robots Purchases of robots are set to rocket as their capabilities increase and costs fall, a trend driven by massive investments in artificial intelligence and robotics by the military and by computing giants such as Google.

All these factors are now converging to push seemingly futuristic technologies out of the lab, and set them on the same path taken by personal computing and consumer electronics.

Illustrations by Greygouar; Design by Wes Fernandes/Nature; Sources: 1. top500; 2. IDC Digital Universe Study, 2012; 3. Cisco Visual Network Index (VNI), 2015; 4. Cisco VNI Global IP Traffic Forecast, 2014–2019; 5. NCBI; 6. EPSRC; Direct Manufacturing Research Center; Roland Berger; 7. International federation of robotics, Japan Robot Association; Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade & Industry; euRobotics; BCG

If the pace of change is exponentially speeding up, all those advances could begin to look trivial within a few years. Take ‘deep learning’, a form of artificial intelligence that uses powerful microprocessor chips and algorithms to simulate neural networks that train and learn through experience, using massive data sets. Last month, the Google-owned AI company DeepMind used deep learning to enable a computer to beat for the first time a human professional at the game of Go, long considered one of the grand challenges of AI. Researchers told Nature that they foresee a future just 20 years from now — or even sooner — in which robots with AI are as common as cars or phones and are integrated into families, offices and factories. The “disruptive exponentials” of technological change will create “a world where everybody can have a robot and robots are pervasively integrated in the fabric of life”, says Daniela Rus, head of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge.

After decades in development, applications of AI are moving into the real world, says Li, with the arrival of self-driving cars, virtual reality and more. Progress in AI and robotics is likely to accelerate rapidly as deep-pocketed companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Microsoft pour billions of dollars into these fields. Gill Pratt, former head of the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Robotics Challenge, asked last year whether robotics is about to undergo a ‘Cambrian explosion’ — a period of rapid machine diversification (G. A. Pratt J. Econ. Perspect. 29, 51–60; 2015). Although a single robot cannot yet match the learning ability of a toddler, Pratt pointed out that robots have one huge advantage: humans can communicate with each other at only 10 bits per second — whereas robots can communicate through the Internet at speeds 100 million times faster. This could, he said, result in multitides of robots building on each other’s learning experiences at lightning speed. Pratt was hired last September to head the Toyota Research Institute, a new US$1-billion AI and robotics research venture headquartered in Palo Alto, California.

Many researchers say that it is important to prepare for this new world. “We need to become much more responsible in terms of designing and operating these robots as they become more powerful,” says Li. In January 2015, a group including Elon Musk, Bill Gates and Stephen Hawking penned an open letter calling for extensive research to maximize the benefits of AI and avoid its potential pitfalls. The letter has now been signed by more than 8,000 people.

Yet predicting the future can be a fool’s game — and not everyone is convinced that technological change will hit humanity quite so fast. Ken Goldberg, an engineer at the University of California, Berkeley, questions the idea that technologies advance exponentially across the board, or that those that do will continue indefinitely. “The danger of overly optimistic exuberance is that it could set unrealistic expectations and trigger the next AI winter,” he says, alluding to periods in AI’s history where hype gave way to disappointment followed by steep cuts in funding. Goldberg says that recent warnings that AI and robots risk surpassing human intelligence are “greatly exaggerated”.

And Stuart Russell, a computer scientist at the University of California, Berkeley, questions the notion that exponential advances in technology necessarily lead to transformative leaps. “If we had computers a trillion times faster we wouldn’t have human-level AI; half in jest, one might say we’d just get wrong answers a trillion times sooner,” he says. “What matters are real conceptual and algorithmic breakthroughs, which are very hard to predict.”

Russell did sign the Hawking letter — and says it is important not to ignore the ways that technologies could be taken in potentially harmful directions with profound results. “We made this mistake with fossil-fuel technologies 100 years ago — now it’s probably too late.”

Future focus

Expert predictions

“A possible ‘Cambrian explosion’ in robotics with a rapid period of incredible machine diversification. Robots communicating with each other at speeds that are 100 million times faster than humans might allow swarms of robots to build on each other’s learning experiences at lightning speed.” Gill Pratt, Head of the Toyota Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

“A full brain-activity map and connectome by 2020 and by 2040 it will be routine to read and write data to billions of neurons. By 2040,1 billion people will have their whole genome sequenced and get constant updates of their immunomes and microbiomes.” George Church, Geneticist at Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts

“The promise for the future is a world where robots are as common as cars and phones, a world where everybody can have a robot and robots are pervasively integrated in the fabric of life.” Daniela Rus, Head of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

“In the next couple of generations, we will seethe first phase of true personal, assistive robots in the home and other human environments. There will be a huge opportunity to better the quality of life, for example by freeing up people from work.” Fei-Fei Li, Head of the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, California

“Tomorrow’s scientists will have armies of virtual graduate students, doing lab work, statistical analysis, literature search and even paper-writing for them.” Pedro Domingos, Machine-learning researcher, University of Washington, Seattle

Illustrations by Greygouar

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
530,
Pages:
398–401
Date published:
()
DOI:
doi:10.1038/530398a

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

5 comments Subscribe to comments

  1. Avatar for Majid Ali
    Majid Ali
    Future Generations - Who Will Keep Whom As a Pet? My first three thoughts on reading the words “Future Generations - Tomorrow’s World” were about: (1) nature’s preoccupation about complementarity and contrarity (2) a Boeing 747 crawling in at Athens airport; and (3) a boy and a man sitting in a restaurant in Time Square, New York. Sometime in the early 1990s, a pulmonologist in a green gown barged in my office and asked me to expedite the analysis of gases on a blood sample he clutched in his hand. I accompanied him to the laboratory section and asked the technologist to perform the analysis on a stat basis. It is a simple courtesy for hospital pathologists when the clinicians appear to be under stress. Walking back to my office, I thought about the clinical problem that the patient might have and how life-saving oxygen can be in respiratory failure. Then my mind drifted back to sometimes in 1958 or 1959 when I first heard that oxygen therapy is known to have caused retrolental fibroplasia and blindness in premature babies. In 1997, I published Nature’s Preoccupation With Complementarity and Contrarity, the first volume of my textbook, The Principles and Practice of Integrative Medicine (ref. 1). A few years later, My wife and I were among over 300 passengers waiting at Athens airport to board a plane for flight to New York when I saw a 747 plane approaching the gate. God, it will swallow us all here and regurgitate us all in New York some hours later, I told my wife. Everyone here is happy to see this monster move closer. What a tribute to technology! It will tear through clouds and subdue the sky. I heard someone cough and my mind wandered to a lowly flu virus for which we have no answer. So that’s the difference between conquering the inanimate and being humbled by the animate, I mused. In my book, The Rooster, the Flu, and the Imperial Medicine of the New Empire (2006)I describe the 1918 bird flu pandemic which claimed fifty to one hundred million victims, including my grandmother and three aunts living in Punjab, then in northern India (ref. 2). Recently, my wife and I were having dinner at a restaurant in Time Square. A boy, ten years or so old sat across from a man at a table adjoining our table. They looked like a father and a son. Both were completely immersed in their smart phones. Several minutes passed without any eye contact between them. I wondered how long it might take for that eye contact. Several more minutes passed. I became curious and looked at my watch in order to time them. We left 55 minutes after I began marking the time. Not once did they shift their eyes from their smart phones to acknowledge each other. I thought about how children now see their smart phones as their pets. They text as they might pet their pets. Will the smart phones take over? It seems to me that they will. When? I devoted my book The Cortical Monkey and Healing (1991) to this question (ref. 3). I end my comments with Stuart Russell’s words included in the article entitled Future Generation: “If we had computers a trillion times faster we wouldn’t have human-level AI; half in jest, one might say we’d just get wrong answers a trillion times sooner.” References: 1. Ali M. The Principles and Practice of Integrative Medicine Volume I: Nature's Preoccupation With Complementarity and Contrariety. New York. Canary 21 Press. 1998. 2nd edition 2005. 2. Ali M. The Rooster, the Flu, and the Imperial Medicine of the New Empire. New York. Canary 21 Press. 2006. 3. Ali M. The Cortical Monkey and Healing. Bloomfield, New Jersey. Life Span Books 1991
  2. Avatar for Alan Hall
    Alan Hall
    “We live in a mind-blowingly different world than our grandparents.” Really? My grandparents saw the advent of automobiles, running water, electricity and refrigeration. Those were truly life-altering technologies. Economist Robert Gordon makes a good point--there hasn't been as much improvement in quality of life during my lifetime as there was in theirs. I'd give up my smartphone in a minute to keep my running water.
  3. Avatar for Vic Kley
    Vic Kley
    Most of the comments in this piece are at best half truths. One example is the Robot in the Home by Fei Fei Li. There are many dedicated small and even large tasks a Robot might do but the Robot cost will go as the size and its specific abilities to handle heavy things and see as well or better then a human. Few people in the world will be able to afford such things certainly not all of the 8 plus billion people on the earth. Indeed follow the smart phone ownership to see where it might go- today 2 billion people. Another example is Elon Musk, Bill Gates and Stephen Hawking all good people I'm sure (at least Hawking) telling us to beware the bander snatch of Artificial Intelligence yet none of them are coders with experience of self-learning software. They have nothing going for them except a public that thinks they are technological geniuses. They should have the good sense to bow out before their words prove their buffoonery.
  4. Avatar for Louis Oldershaw
    Louis Oldershaw
    I cannot wait for a really advanced computer system to process all available, well-tested, observational physics/astronomy data and then formulate an unbiased cosmological paradigm. I would bet dollars to donuts that it would do one hell of a lot better than our current crop of theoretical physicists.-------------------------------- Also, George Jetson has been haranguing everyone he can button-hole about why he still cannot have the flying car that he was promised long ago.--------------------------------LO------[Fractal Cosmology]
  5. Avatar for Jean SmilingCoyote
    Jean SmilingCoyote
    Tell Mr. Jetson I saw his flying car in the EAA Museum in Oshkosh, Wisconsin some years ago.

CRISPR in humans

crispr-human

CRISPR gene-editing tested in a person for the first time

The move by Chinese scientists could spark a biomedical duel between China and the United States.

Newsletter

The best science news from Nature and beyond, direct to your inbox every day.

Radio-wave weirdness

fast-radio-burst-mystery

Long-sought signal deepens mystery of fast radio bursts

A discovery that was supposed to help reveal how the bursts arise only thickens the plot.

Warming waters

ocean

How much longer can Antarctica’s hostile ocean delay global warming?

The waters of the Southern Ocean have absorbed much of the excess heat and carbon generated by humanity.

The ultimate experiment

trump-science-experiment

How Trump will handle science

Climate-change and immigration policies raise alarm, but much of the incoming US president's agenda is simply unknown.

Testing genetics

mutations

The flip side of personal genomics: When a mutation doesn't spell disease

Researchers worry about misinforming people about the risk of disease.

Nature Podcast

new-pod-red

Listen

This week, your brain on cannabis, testing CRISPR in a human, and what it might be like to live on Mars.