Scientists think they can prove that free will is an illusion. Philosophers are urging them to think again.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H.-J. & Haynes, J.-D. Nature Neurosci. 11, 543-545 (2008).
Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W. & Pearl, D. K. Brain 106, 623-642 (1983).
Bode, S. et al. PLoS ONE 6, e21612 (2011).
Fried, I., Mukamel, R. & Kreiman, G. Neuron 69, 548-562 (2011).
Vohs, K. D. & Schooler, J. W. Psychol. Sci. 19, 49-54 (2008).
Additional information
Kerri Smith is editor of the Nature Podcast, and is based in London.
Related links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, K. Neuroscience vs philosophy: Taking aim at free will. Nature 477, 23–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/477023a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/477023a
This article is cited by
-
Quantum No-Go Theorems and Consciousness
Axiomathes (2013)
-
Vrije wil
Neuropraxis (2013)