Published online 7 October 2009 | Nature 461, 716-718 (2009) | doi:10.1038/461716a
Corrected online: 22 October 2009
Corrected online: 26 November 2009

News Feature

Environment: The disappearing nutrient

Phosphate-based fertilizers have helped spur agricultural gains in the past century, but the world may soon run out of them. Natasha Gilbert investigates the potential phosphate crisis.

Ten years ago, Don Mavinic was working on a way to get rid of a pesky precipitate that plugs up the works of waste-water treatment plants. Known as struvite, the solid crud forms in pipes and pumps when bacteria are used to clean up sewerage sludge.

Mavinic, a civil engineer at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, realized that struvite was more than just rubbish. A combination of phosphate, magnesium and ammonium, struvite contains many of the essential nutrients that plants need. Mavinic has developed a way to remove the precipitate during the water-treatment process and he is now selling it as a 'green' fertilizer. His technology was first used commercially in 2007 in a treatment plant in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. It has since been exported to a plant in Portland, Oregon, which began using it this year. A sewage works in Derby, UK, successfully tested the technology in September.

“I am starting to think phosphate rock is becoming a strategic material for many countries.”

Steven Van Kauwenbergh

Aside from finding a use for a troublesome by-product, the recycling of struvite could also help solve a much bigger problem: the dwindling supply of phosphate rock. All life forms require phosphorus in the form of phosphate, which has an essential role in RNA and DNA and in cellular metabolism. Every year, China, the United States, Morocco and other countries mine millions of tonnes of phosphate from the ground, the bulk of which is turned into fertilizer for food crops. But such deposits are a finite resource and could disappear within the century.

Experts disagree on how much phosphate is left and how quickly it will be exhausted. But many argue that a shortage is coming and that it will leave the world's future food supply hanging in the balance.

"I am starting to think phosphate rock is becoming a strategic material for many countries. In the future it's going to become more and more valuable," says Steven Van Kauwenbergh of the IFDC, an International Center for Soil Fertility & Agricultural Development based in Muscle Shoals, Alabama. Indeed, as political and social tensions build over the reserves of phosphate rock, the world could move from an oil-based to a phosphate-based economy, say some scientists and industry representatives.

"It is a very curious thing that something so important is so poorly understood and so little talked about in the larger political arena," says Arno Rosemarin, a water-resources specialist at the Stockholm Environment Institute who has researched global phosphate use. Although international leaders have not tended to focus on the potential for phosphate shortages, the issue has been proposed for discussion next month at a United Nations meeting on global food security — an indication that it is starting to attract the attention of the international community.

Just decades left?

In many countries, phosphorus is a limiting plant nutrient in short supply in the soil. So farmers add phosphate-based fertilizers to increase agricultural yields. That has spawned a global phosphate-mining industry with sales totalling in the tens of billions of dollars.

SOURCE: USGC

The US Geological Survey (USGS) in Reston, Virginia, estimates that around 62 billion tonnes of phosphate remain in the ground (see graphic). This includes 15 billion tonnes of deposits that are mineable at present and others that are not being exploited. The latter are left in the ground mainly because they contain too many impurities — such as cadmium and other toxic metals — or because they are offshore in difficult-to-reach places.

In 2008, 161 million tonnes of phosphate was mined around the world, according to the latest, as yet unpublished, figures from the US Geological Survey. Stephen Jasinski, phosphate-rock commodities expert at the survey, says that demand for fertilizers is predicted to grow by 2.5-3% per year for the next 5 years. If that rate continues, the world's reserves should last for around 125 years.

That is a relatively optimistic timescale, but it is echoed by the International Fertilizer Industry Association in Paris, whose members include 90% of the world's fertilizer producers. Michel Prud'homme, executive secretary of the association's Production and International Trade Committee, says that the industry anticipates that demand for fertilizers will grow at a "fairly moderate rate", slowing by the middle of the century. That would enable reserves to last for at least another 100 years.

But others predict a faster growth in demand for fertilizers, which would deplete phosphate reserves even quicker. The increased use will be driven in part by the rising global population, which will require food production to at least double by 2050, according to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

Rosemarin and others say that nations should not rely on the reserves laden with impurities or located offshore because of the costs — both environmental and economic — of extracting usable phosphate. The remaining accessible reserves of clean phosphate rock would run out in 50 years, if growth stays at 3% per year, says Rosemarin.

But the estimates all suffer from a lack of reliable data. Most of the world's phosphate-mining companies are integrated with fertilizer firms and the mines are either owned by the companies or are under state control, says Prud'homme. As a result, it is difficult to get accurate, independent information on phosphate reserves.

Eric Kueneman, deputy director of the FAO's plant production and protection division says, "the reality is we as a public institution don't really know what the industry knows and nor do they know among themselves. To give a reliable answer to the question, 'will phosphates run out?', we need a crystal ball."

The International Fertilizer Industry Association collects data from its members on their existing reserves and on potential upcoming capacity. But some experts question the accuracy of these data because they are supplied by producers who might be disinclined to provide proprietary information that could harm their commercial positions.

No agreement

There is also a lot of uncertainty over the data supplied by governments, which is the case with China and Morocco, says Dana Cordell, who has just completed her doctoral thesis on the effect of phosphate reserves on food security at the University of Technology Sydney in Australia. For example, when China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, its reported reserves of phosphate rock instantly jumped from just over 2 billion tonnes to nearly 8 billion tonnes1.

Cordell and Kueneman call for independent data collection on phosphate rock reserves. "Unlike for energy, water or nitrogen, there is no single international organization responsible for phosphate resources. That is very concerning," Cordell says.

“There is no single international organization responsible for phosphate resources.”

Dana Cordell

The IFDC hopes to generate more solid data about the extent of the world's phosphate resources and reserves. It will soon launch a project that will query phosphate producers, academics and other minerals specialists to collect extensive data on how much phosphate there is, how pure it is, what might be available in the future and the useful life of existing mines. Van Kauwenbergh, who is leading the project, expects to publish the first round of data in May next year. If the centre secures more funding, he hopes to continue the research for another 5 years.

The USGS figures on phosphate reserves are the most-quoted publicly available information. But there are problems with them because the agency gets its information from foreign governments, not directly from producers, and it is not independently verified. "We just don't know how good the USGS data are because they are based on second and third-hand information. The figures change all the time," says Van Kauwenbergh.

Some people who track the phosphate industry say that there is no cause for concern about phosphate running out. "I don't think this is an immediate crisis, but it is something we should be paying attention to," says Jasinski.

Prud'homme is sanguine about prospects for the future. If demand rises, then so will prices, he says, allowing companies to explore for new reserves and mine those that are harder to reach or from a lower grade of rock. "We feel there are enough reserves to meet food and material needs," he says.

For example, companies have recently begun to investigate deposits in Peru, Australia and off the coast of Namibia that were not previously considered financially viable, says Prud'homme. These resources are not fully taken into account in the most recent USGS figures on world phosphate reserves, he says. And as some existing mines are tapped out, others are opening up in places such as Saudi Arabia. "I am convinced there are other sources we have not yet found, but it is difficult to say how much impact these will have," he says.

Others are sceptical that further exploration will uncover large new deposits or that they will solve the longer-term problem. "We are not going to find another Morocco," says Jasinski, referring to the country with the biggest remaining reserves.

In the meantime, companies have started to invest in new technologies to exploit the lower-grade and offshore deposits. The impetus for this move into more costly production was the hike in phosphate rock prices in 2008, when the value temporarily spiked at US$500 per tonne, more than five times the average price in 20072. Prices had remained comparatively flat for the previous five years. The price hike was due to tight supplies of the rock caused by increased demand for phosphate-based fertilizers in India and China as well as record energy prices. Phosphate prices have since dropped back to their pre-spike levels.

Few alternatives

Despite the investments in unconventional reserves, those deposits may not be viable in the long term. Jan-Olof Drangert, an expert in water and land resources at Linköping University in Sweden, says that lower-grade reserves are "not a solution" if the world wants a sustainable system. Not only will extracting lower-grade phosphates be very expensive, it will also pollute the soils with cadmium, which is highly toxic to plant and animal life even in low doses, he says. "And then there is still the problem of exhausting these lower-grade reserves," he adds.

The increase in demand for fertilizer in 2008 may have been a taste of things to come, especially if demand for food rises as fast as some estimates suggest. The price hike last year "was a huge shock to farmers", says Cordell. Fertilizers had to be rationed in some cases.

"The bottom line is that it will just cost more to eat," says Rosemarin. "There will be no cheap lunches any more."

Struvite build-up in water-treatment pipes could be a valuable source of phosphate.Struvite build-up in water-treatment pipes could be a valuable source of phosphate.CLEAN WATER SERVICES

The uncertainty over the world's phosphate reserves is compounded by the fact that supply is concentrated is just a few hands. China, Morocco, the United States and Russia together hold more than 70% of the global phosphate deposits3, presenting the possibility of "market manipulation", says Amit Roy, president of the IFDC.

Evidence of strategic manoeuvring can already be seen. In March 2004, the United States and Morocco signed a free-trade agreement that covered phosphate rock, among other commodities. In 2008, Morocco exported $65-million worth of fertilizer to the United States4. Although the United States has one of the world's largest phosphate rock reserves, the nation will see a significant drop in production in 25 years when it is estimated that production will peak at its key mines in Florida. The deal with Morocco, says Rosemarin, is aimed at securing the United State's future fertilizer and food supply.

In the case of some finite resources, such as oil, alternatives can be found. But there are currently no substitutes for phosphates. Cutting usage will help to make reserves last longer (see 'Making fertilizers go further').

But most agree that some of the biggest gains will probably be made from the recovery and recycling of phosphates, such as Mavinic's work mining the phosphate deposits inside water-treatment plants. In a back-of-the-envelope calculation, he estimates that if all domestic wastewater facilities in Canada were converted into biological treatment systems using his technology, the country could produce enough fertilizer to meet about 30% of its current needs.

That pales, however, when compared with a much richer — and more pungent — source of phosphate: the manure generated by dairy and pig farming. Livestock waste contains around five times more phosphate than human waste. And the global livestock population is around 65 billion, more than ten times the human population. There is "enormous potential" for recovering phosphates from livestock waste, says Mavinic, who has turned his attention to doing just that.

ADVERTISEMENT

The problem his research team is trying to solve is that phosphates in livestock waste are not in a dissolved form, which is necessary to make struvite. If programmes to recover phosphates from livestock waste succeed, "the sky is the limit", says Mavinic. "We would probably not have to import any fertilizer into this country."

But all this takes time. Decades may pass before recycling technologies gear up and new supplies of phosphate come on line. At present, nations have expressed little concern over the finite phosphate resource and are eagerly consuming reserves. When solutions do eventually emerge, the world could already be in the grip of a fertilizer and food shortage. 

Natasha Gilbert is a reporter based in Nature 's London office.

Corrected:

There is a "Correction":http://www.nature.com/uidfinder/10.1038/4611041b associated with this article. The estimate for the amount of phosphate that could be extracted from the ground should have be 47 billion tonnes not 62 billion. This means that the figures in the pie chart should read: United States (3.4 Gt), China (10 Gt), Morocco and Western Sahara (21 Gt), South Africa (2.5 Gt) and Rest of the world (10.1 Gt).

Corrected:

There is a "Correction":http://www.nature.com/uidfinder/10.1038/462404b associated with this article. Amit Roy was misquoted as saying there was a possibility of “market manipulation” with phosphates. His full quote was: “The biggest challenge is that concentration of supply is only in a few hands and there is the possibility of manipulation of supply, demand and prices.” Roy did not mean to imply that there is a possibility of market collusion.
  • References

    1. Rosemarin, A. Down to Earth June , 27-31 (2004)..
    2. USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries: Phosphate Rock (USGS, 2009).
    3. IFDC Global Phosphate Reserves, Resources and Future Production (IFDC, 2008).
    4. http://www.moroccousafta.com/tradedata.htm
    5. Vitousek, P. M. et al. Science 324, 1519-1520 (2009). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
Commenting is now closed.