Access
This article is part of Nature's premium content.
Published online 4 March 2009 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2009.138
News
FDA-approved warning labels won't protect companies
US court says people harmed by drugs can still sue.
In a major blow to drug makers, the US Supreme Court today (4 March) ruled 6-3 against the drug company Wyeth in a case that asked whether warning labels approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should protect pharmaceutical companies from being sued in state court when their medicines harm people.
In the case of _Wyeth v.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Comments
Reader comments are usually moderated after posting. If you find something offensive or inappropriate, you can speed this process by clicking 'Report this comment' (or, if that doesn't work for you, email webadmin@nature.com). For more controversial topics, we reserve the right to moderate before comments are published.
Maybe I don't fully understand but it's ridiculous that company will pay for obvious mistake made by nurse or whoever did the injection. "The drug was mistakenly injected (...)" By whom? In this case only that question should have been asked. "Disappointing court's decision" is understatement. It's simply stupid. -T.Metek
That decision reminds me of a previous resulting in the warning: don't dry your pet in the microwave.