Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News
  • Published:

Pushing the modelling envelope

Could more than 60% of 'climate envelope' studies be wrong?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Beale, C. M., Lennon, J. J. & Gimona, A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA doi:10.1073/pnas.0803506105 (2008).

  2. Pearson, R. G. & Dawson, T. E. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12, 361-371 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hijmans, R. J. & Graham, C. H. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 2272-2281 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hampe, A. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 13, 469-476 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas, C. D. et al. Nature 427, 145-148 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Extinction risk from climate change

Biodiversity conservation: Uncertainty in predictions of extinction risk

Biodiversity conservation: Effects of changes in climate and land use

Biodiversity conservation: Climate change and extinction risk

The escalator effect

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cressey, D. Pushing the modelling envelope. Nature (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2008.1108

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2008.1108

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing