Access
This article is part of Nature's premium content.
Published online 8 May 2008 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2008.806
News
Giant bacterium carries thousands of genomes
Why does it bother?
It seems like a peculiar case of genomic overkill: a single-celled bacterium has been found that keeps tens of thousands of copies of its genome. The finding sets a record for most genomes per cell, but also poses an obvious question: what could be the advantage of stashing away as much as 200,000 copies of your genome?
The number of genome copies in each cell varies by species.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Comments
Reader comments are usually moderated after posting. If you find something offensive or inappropriate, you can speed this process by clicking 'Report this comment' (or, if that doesn't work for you, email redesign@nature.com). For more controversial topics, we reserve the right to moderate before comments are published.
how did you found gigantism in this bacteria? such a confusing idea. From Tiurma Simanjuntak
Extreme polyploidy in a large bacterium or extreme dogmatism by some bacteriologists?------------- I have followed the stories on this giant bacterium for quite some time and developed an immune system against sensational reports on this amazing bacterium. Many times I found that the stories on this yet-to-be-cultured bacterium are weird to logical sense. As a matter of fact, I even published a review/commentary entitled "Eccentric Microbes or Eccentric Microbiologists? - Recapturing a 15-Year-Long Fight against Dogma" (Pioneer 1: 33-48, 2006) to cover some unbelievable stories on this unique bacterium (http://im1.biz/albums/userpics/10001/P2006V1N1A8_Eccentric.htm or http://im1.biz/albums/userpics/10001/P2006V1N1A8_Eccentric.pdf ).///// My logical sense told me that there is also likely a chance that the conclusion of extreme polyploidy for this giant bacterium will be a mistake due to the reliance on some dogmatic assumptions. However, I am going to follow a scholar dispute with the authors by submitting a Letter to PNAS. I hope that PNAS will not reject my submission like it has done so many times before against my valid criticisms. ------ Shi V. Liu (SVL@logibio.com; http://im1.biz; http://blog.sina.com.cn/im1)
This comment has been removed by the moderator
Show me the real data!!!!-------Since I sent the corresponding author of this interesting paper a request for answering some questions and shared me with the real data I have not received any response. This lack of response continued even after I wrote to the editors of PNAS and a notice was sent from the PNAS to the corresponding author. I am wondering why it is so difficult to submit the real data for other to perform their independent analysis.//// By the way I was not asking for any unpublished data. What I asked for are the data used for generating those published tables and figures.//// Thus, it should not take any long time to send those data out because they should be ready. ------- Shi V. Liu (SVL@logibio.com; http://im1.biz)
This comment has been removed by the moderator
This comment has been removed by the moderator
This comment has been removed by the moderator