A 'vaccine court' case on autism could have disastrous consequences if people confuse its verdict with scientific consensus.
Article PDF
References
Madsen K. M., et al. N. Engl. J. Med., 347. 1477 - 1482 (2002).
Smeeth L., et al. Lancet, 364. 963 - 969 (2004).
Immunization Safety Review: Vaccines and Autism (National Academies, Washington DC, 2004)
Wakefield A., et al. Lancet, 351. 637 - 641 (1998).
Murch S. H., et al. Lancet, 363. 750 (2004).
Related links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mandavilli, A. Unreasonable doubt. Nature (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/news070611-13
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/news070611-13